• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然观察行为中的探索与开发。

Exploration and Exploitation in Natural Viewing Behavior.

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.

Social and Media Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 May 23;7(1):2311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02526-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-02526-1
PMID:28536434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5442137/
Abstract

Many eye-tracking studies investigate visual behavior with a focus on image features and the semantic content of a scene. A wealth of results on these aspects is available, and our understanding of the decision process where to look has reached a mature stage. However, the temporal aspect, whether to stay and further scrutinize a region (exploitation) or to move on and explore image regions that were yet not in the focus of attention (exploration) is less well understood. Here, we investigate the trade-off between these two processes across stimuli with varying properties and sizes. In a free viewing task, we examined gaze parameters in humans, involving the central tendency, entropy, saccadic amplitudes, number of fixations and duration of fixations. The results revealed that the central tendency and entropy scaled with stimulus size. The mean saccadic amplitudes showed a linear increase that originated from an interaction between the distribution of saccades and the spatial bias. Further, larger images led to spatially more extensive sampling as indicated by a higher number of fixations at the expense of reduced fixation durations. These results demonstrate a profound shift from exploitation to exploration as an adaptation of main gaze parameters with increasing image size.

摘要

许多眼动追踪研究都集中在图像特征和场景的语义内容上,以研究视觉行为。在这些方面已经有了大量的研究成果,我们对注视点决策过程的理解已经达到了成熟阶段。然而,对于时间方面,即是停留并进一步仔细观察一个区域(开发)还是继续前进并探索尚未成为关注焦点的图像区域(探索),我们的理解还不够充分。在这里,我们研究了在具有不同特性和大小的刺激之间这两个过程之间的权衡。在自由观看任务中,我们检查了人类的注视参数,包括中央趋势、熵、扫视幅度、注视次数和注视持续时间。结果表明,中央趋势和熵与刺激大小成正比。平均扫视幅度呈线性增加,这源于扫视分布与空间偏向之间的相互作用。此外,更大的图像导致空间上更广泛的采样,表现为注视次数增加,而注视持续时间减少。这些结果表明,随着图像尺寸的增加,主要注视参数发生了深刻的转变,从开发转向探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/ca841db971bb/41598_2017_2526_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/cb6e9be343f2/41598_2017_2526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/d929ca7f2f89/41598_2017_2526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/742775272f69/41598_2017_2526_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/3084b15d00b6/41598_2017_2526_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/5d2bf72987a1/41598_2017_2526_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/3d0459249065/41598_2017_2526_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/f496c6dc61fb/41598_2017_2526_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/668dcdb7ef18/41598_2017_2526_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/ca841db971bb/41598_2017_2526_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/cb6e9be343f2/41598_2017_2526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/d929ca7f2f89/41598_2017_2526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/742775272f69/41598_2017_2526_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/3084b15d00b6/41598_2017_2526_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/5d2bf72987a1/41598_2017_2526_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/3d0459249065/41598_2017_2526_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/f496c6dc61fb/41598_2017_2526_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/668dcdb7ef18/41598_2017_2526_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a8e/5442137/ca841db971bb/41598_2017_2526_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploration and Exploitation in Natural Viewing Behavior.自然观察行为中的探索与开发。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 23;7(1):2311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02526-1.
2
Spatial frequency processing in the central and peripheral visual field during scene viewing.场景观看过程中中央和周边视野的空间频率处理
Vision Res. 2016 Oct;127:186-197. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
3
Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.扫视语境指示视觉固视内的信息处理:来自相关事件电位和眼动分析的分心效应证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Apr;80(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
4
When do you look where you look? A visual field asymmetry.你何时看向你所看之处?一种视野不对称现象。
Vision Res. 2014 Sep;102:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
5
An oculomotor continuum from exploration to fixation.从探索到注视的眼球运动连续体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):6175-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222715110. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
6
Effects of contextual information and stimulus ambiguity on overt visual sampling behavior.情境信息和刺激模糊性对明显视觉采样行为的影响。
Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt A):76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
7
Consistent left gaze bias in processing different facial cues.处理不同面部线索时存在一致的左侧注视偏向。
Psychol Res. 2012 May;76(3):263-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0340-9. Epub 2011 May 11.
8
How does image noise affect actual and predicted human gaze allocation in assessing image quality?在评估图像质量时,图像噪声如何影响实际的和预测的人类注视分配?
Vision Res. 2015 Jul;112:11-25. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 May 14.
9
Curious eyes: individual differences in personality predict eye movement behavior in scene-viewing.好奇的眼睛:个性中的个体差异预测了场景观看中的眼球运动行为。
Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
10
Natural visual behavior in individuals with peripheral visual-field loss.周边视野丧失个体的自然视觉行为。
J Vis. 2018 Nov 1;18(12):10. doi: 10.1167/18.12.10.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the Visual Analysis of Form and Contour.形状与轮廓视觉分析的发展
Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;12(8):1005. doi: 10.3390/children12081005.
2
Human creativity versus artificial intelligence: source attribution, observer attitudes, and eye movements while viewing visual art.人类创造力与人工智能:观看视觉艺术作品时的来源归因、观察者态度及眼动情况
Front Psychol. 2025 May 12;16:1509974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1509974. eCollection 2025.
3
No robust evidence for an effect of head-movement propensity on central bias in head-constrained scene viewing, despite an effect on fixation duration.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing the effects of a disgust placebo with eye tracking.通过眼动追踪测试厌恶安慰剂的效果。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Mar;101:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
2
Information-theoretic model comparison unifies saliency metrics.信息论模型比较统一了显著性度量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 29;112(52):16054-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510393112. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
3
Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration.听觉和视觉共享空间注意力资源,但注意力负荷并不会干扰视听整合。
尽管头部运动倾向对注视持续时间有影响,但在头部受限的场景观看中,没有确凿证据表明其对中央偏差有影响。
J Vis. 2025 Apr 1;25(4):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.4.10.
4
Exploration-exploitation model of moth-inspired olfactory navigation.基于 moth-inspired 嗅觉导航的探索-开发模型。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Jul;21(216):20230746. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0746. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
5
Refixation behavior in naturalistic viewing: Methods, mechanisms, and neural correlates.自然观看中的重新注视行为:方法、机制及神经关联
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jan;87(1):25-49. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02836-9. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
6
Planning to revisit: Neural activity in refixation precursors.计划回访:再注视前导的神经活动。
J Vis. 2023 Jul 3;23(7):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.7.2.
7
Look twice: A generalist computational model predicts return fixations across tasks and species.多看两眼:一个通才计算模型可以预测跨任务和物种的返回注视点。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Nov 22;18(11):e1010654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010654. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
What are the visuo-motor tendencies of omnidirectional scene free-viewing in virtual reality?在虚拟现实中,全方位场景自由观看的视动趋势是什么?
J Vis. 2022 Mar 2;22(4):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.12.
9
Emergence of perceptuomotor relationships during paleolithic stone toolmaking learning: intersections of observation and practice.旧石器时代石器制造学习过程中感知运动关系的出现:观察与实践的交集。
Commun Biol. 2021 Nov 11;4(1):1278. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02768-w.
10
Spontaneous perception: a framework for task-free, self-paced perception.自发感知:一种无任务、自定节奏感知的框架。
Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Aug 4;2021(2):niab016. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab016. eCollection 2021.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 29;6:1084. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01084. eCollection 2015.
4
Hand washing induces a clean slate effect in moral judgments: a pupillometry and eye-tracking study.洗手在道德判断中会引发一种清白效应:一项瞳孔测量与眼动追踪研究。
Sci Rep. 2015 May 21;5:10471. doi: 10.1038/srep10471.
5
Forced-choice decision-making in modified trolley dilemma situations: a virtual reality and eye tracking study.改良版电车困境情境中的强制选择决策:一项虚拟现实与眼动追踪研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec 16;8:426. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00426. eCollection 2014.
6
Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society.太空、思维与社会中的探索与利用
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;19(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
What Guides Visual Overt Attention under Natural Conditions? Past and Future Research.在自然条件下,是什么引导视觉外显注意?过去与未来的研究。
ISRN Neurosci. 2013 Dec 12;2013:868491. doi: 10.1155/2013/868491. eCollection 2013.
8
The exploration-exploitation dilemma: a multidisciplinary framework.探索-开发困境:一个多学科框架。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095693. eCollection 2014.
9
Spatial biases in viewing behavior.观看行为中的空间偏差。
J Vis. 2014 Feb 25;14(2):20. doi: 10.1167/14.2.20.
10
Saccadic momentum and facilitation of return saccades contribute to an optimal foraging strategy.扫视性眼球运动的冲力和返回扫视的易化有助于最佳觅食策略。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(1):e1002871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002871. Epub 2013 Jan 17.