Sivapalan Praleene, Bäck Anne Caroline, Ostrowski Sisse Rye, Ravn Hanne Berg, Johansson Pär Ingemar
a Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology , Copenhagen University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark.
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery , Copenhagen University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Sep;77(5):345-351. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1325000. Epub 2017 May 24.
Managing haemostasis in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery remains a challenge. There is no established laboratory test to predict transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery. We investigated whether preoperative Thromboelastography (TEG) with Platelet Mapping Assay (PMA) or Multiple Electrode Aggrometry (MEA) could predict transfusion requirements in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or combined CABG with aortic or mitral valve replacement. We prospectively investigated 199 patients undergoing elective CABG or combined procedures. PMA and MEA were performed at baseline (after anaesthesia induction), upon arrival at the intensive care unit and on the first postoperative day. Patients receiving fresh frozen plasma and/or platelets (FFP/PLT) had a lower PMA maximum amplitude (MA) for adenosine diphosphate (PMA-ADP) and arachidonic acid (PMA-AA) at baseline, at arrival in the intensive care unit and the first postoperative day compared to non-transfused patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves on PMA showed that lower values predicted FFP/PLT transfusion: PMA-ActF 0.64 (p = 0.04), PMA-ADP 0.69 (p = 0.01) and PMA-AA 0.71 (p = 0.002). In contrast, MEA values were not able to predict FFP/PLT transfusions. This study shows that preoperative PMA potentially is a better screening tool for platelet inhibition associated with transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CABG or combined procedures.
在接受体外循环(CPB)手术的患者中进行止血管理仍然是一项挑战。目前尚无既定的实验室检测方法来预测心脏手术中的输血需求。我们研究了术前采用血小板功能分析(PMA)或多电极聚集测定法(MEA)的血栓弹力图(TEG)是否能够预测接受择期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或CABG联合主动脉或二尖瓣置换术患者的输血需求。我们前瞻性地研究了199例接受择期CABG或联合手术的患者。在基线(麻醉诱导后)、到达重症监护病房时以及术后第一天进行PMA和MEA检测。与未输血患者相比,接受新鲜冰冻血浆和/或血小板(FFP/PLT)的患者在基线、到达重症监护病房时以及术后第一天,其针对二磷酸腺苷(PMA-ADP)和花生四烯酸(PMA-AA)的PMA最大振幅(MA)较低。PMA的受试者工作特征曲线显示,较低值可预测FFP/PLT输血:PMA-ActF为0.64(p = 0.04),PMA-ADP为0.69(p = 0.01),PMA-AA为0.71(p = 0.002)。相比之下,MEA值无法预测FFP/PLT输血。本研究表明,术前PMA可能是一种更好的筛查工具,用于评估接受CABG或联合手术患者中与输血需求相关的血小板抑制情况。