Suppr超能文献

在接受阿司匹林治疗并由机械循环支持装置辅助的成年患者中,通过血栓弹力图和全血凝集试验进行血小板功能检测

Platelet Mapping by Thromboelastography and Whole Blood Aggregometry in Adult Patients Supported by Mechanical Circulatory Support Device on Aspirin Therapy.

作者信息

Volod Oksana, Arabia Francisco A, Lam Lee D, Runge Alice, Cheng Caleb, Czer Lawrence S C

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; and.

Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Extra Corpor Technol. 2020 Mar;52(1):13-21. doi: 10.1182/ject-1900029.

Abstract

Patients on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are placed on aspirin and may require platelet function testing (PFT) to monitor the adequacy of therapy. Routine laboratory PFT is performed using whole blood aggregation (WBA) which typically has a long turnaround time (4-5 hours) and may not be readily available. By contrast, platelet mapping by thromboelastography (TPM) can provide results within 45 minutes. The objective of this study was to compare the results of TPM with WBA. We compared platelet mapping maximal amplitude (MA) by TPM with that of arachidonic acid (AA) to WBA with AA by impedance. We analyzed paired samples where both TPM and WBA were available. Of 45 paired samples, 34 were from 29 MCS patients and 11 were from non-MCS patients. When applying institutional interpretation guidelines with an MA cutoff of ≤40 mm, WBA vs TPM MA in non-MCS and MCS patients correlated well with an accuracy of 100 and 94.4%, respectively. MA >40 had poor correlation with an accuracy of 37.5%. Irrespective of MA value, TPM AA inhibition expressed in percent of inhibition had poor accuracy. When used with proper guidelines for interpretation, specifically when MA ≤ 40 mm, TPM is a suitable and reliable test to use for MCS patients on aspirin.

摘要

接受机械循环支持(MCS)设备治疗的患者需服用阿司匹林,可能需要进行血小板功能测试(PFT)以监测治疗效果。常规实验室PFT采用全血凝集法(WBA)进行,其周转时间通常较长(4 - 5小时),且可能无法随时进行检测。相比之下,通过血栓弹力图进行的血小板功能测定(TPM)可在45分钟内得出结果。本研究的目的是比较TPM与WBA的结果。我们将TPM测得的血小板功能测定最大振幅(MA)与花生四烯酸(AA)诱导的WBA通过阻抗法测得的MA进行比较。我们分析了同时具备TPM和WBA检测结果的配对样本。在45对配对样本中,34对来自29例MCS患者,11对来自非MCS患者。当应用机构解读指南,将MA临界值设定为≤40 mm时,非MCS和MCS患者中WBA与TPM的MA相关性良好,准确率分别为100%和94.4%。MA >40时相关性较差,准确率为37.5%。无论MA值如何,以抑制百分比表示的TPM AA抑制率准确性较差。当按照适当的解读指南使用时,特别是当MA≤40 mm时,TPM是用于服用阿司匹林的MCS患者的一种合适且可靠的检测方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验