Charlton Jesse M, Hammond Connor A, Cochrane Christopher K, Hatfield Gillian L, Hunt Michael A
Motion Analysis and Biofeedback Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jun;31(6):1678-1687. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001655.
Barbell back squats are a popular exercise for developing lower extremity strength and power. However, this exercise has potential injury risks, particularly to the lumbar spine, pelvis, and hip joint. Previous literature suggests heel wedges as a means of favorably adjusting trunk and pelvis kinematics with the intention of reducing such injury risks. Yet no direct biomechanical research exists to support these recommendations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of heel wedges compared with barefoot on minimally loaded barbell back squats. Fourteen trained male participants performed a barbell back squat in bare feet or with their feet raised bilaterally with a 2.5-cm wooden block while 3-dimensional kinematics, kinetics, and electromyograms were collected. The heel wedge condition elicited significantly less forward trunk flexion angles at peak knee flexion, and peak external hip joint moments (p ≤ 0.05) compared with barefoot conditions. However, no significant differences were observed between conditions for trunk and pelvis angle differences at peak knee flexion (p > 0.05). Lastly, no peak or root mean square differences in muscle activity were elicited between conditions (p > 0.05). Our results lend support for the suggestions provided in literature aimed at using heel wedges as a means of reducing excessive forward trunk flexion. However, the maintenance of a neutral spine, another important safety factor, is not affected by the use of heel wedges. Therefore, heel wedges may be a viable modification for reduction of excessive forward trunk flexion but not for reduction in relative trunk-pelvis flexion during barbell back squats.
杠铃后深蹲是一种用于发展下肢力量和爆发力的常见训练动作。然而,该训练动作存在潜在的受伤风险,尤其是对腰椎、骨盆和髋关节。以往的文献表明,足跟楔形垫可作为一种有利地调整躯干和骨盆运动学的方法,以降低此类受伤风险。然而,目前尚无直接的生物力学研究来支持这些建议。因此,本研究的目的是检验足跟楔形垫与赤脚相比,对最小负荷杠铃后深蹲的影响。14名受过训练的男性参与者分别进行赤脚杠铃后深蹲或双脚双侧抬高2.5厘米木块的杠铃后深蹲,同时收集三维运动学、动力学和肌电图数据。与赤脚条件相比,足跟楔形垫条件在膝关节屈曲峰值时引起的躯干前屈角度显著减小,髋关节外展峰值力矩也显著减小(p≤0.05)。然而,在膝关节屈曲峰值时,两种条件下躯干和骨盆角度差异未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。最后,两种条件下肌肉活动的峰值或均方根差异均未出现(p>0.05)。我们的研究结果支持了文献中关于使用足跟楔形垫作为减少过度躯干前屈方法的建议。然而,保持脊柱中立这一另一个重要的安全因素不受足跟楔形垫使用的影响。因此,足跟楔形垫可能是减少杠铃后深蹲时过度躯干前屈的一种可行改良方法,但不能减少相对躯干-骨盆屈曲。