• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖型乳房植入物会出现旋转问题吗?对导致旋转的因素的统计分析。

Is Rotation a Concern with Anatomical Breast Implants? A Statistical Analysis of Factors Predisposing to Rotation.

作者信息

Montemurro Paolo, Papas Athanasios, Hedén Per

机构信息

Stockholm, Sweden.

From the Akademikliniken.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1367-1378. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003387.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003387
PMID:28538561
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since their introduction in 1993, anatomical implants have provided a more natural appearance in breast augmentation, and many surgeons advocate their use and promote the good aesthetic results. However, the risk of implant rotation makes some of them reluctant to use these devices. The rotation rate varies among authors.

METHODS

The authors present a 6.5-year series of 531 patients who underwent primary breast augmentation with macrotextured anatomical implants in a Swedish facility performed by one consultant surgeon (P.M.). The authors examined the rotation rate and the correlation with possible predisposing factors such as preoperative breast cup size, childbirth, and body mass index.

RESULTS

A total of 20 implants (1.88 percent; 95 percent CI, 1.15 to 2.89 percent) in 19 patients (3.58 percent; 95 percent CI, 2.17 to 5.53 percent) were rotated. In one patient (0.22 percent), both implants rotated, whereas in the remaining patients, the rotation was unilateral. The authors were unable to establish a statistically significant correlation between implant rotation and previous childbirth or increased body mass index. However, there was a relation between rotation rate and preoperative breast cup size that showed an upward trend as the cup size increased from A to C.

CONCLUSION

The authors believe that if the implant is correctly selected and the operation is performed meticulously with proper pocket dissection, the rotation rate is minimal and it should not be considered a disadvantage for the use of anatomical implants.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

摘要

背景

自1993年引入以来,解剖型乳房植入物在隆胸手术中能提供更自然的外观,许多外科医生提倡使用并宣扬其良好的美学效果。然而,植入物旋转的风险使一些医生不愿使用这些装置。不同作者报道的旋转率有所不同。

方法

作者呈现了一组为期6.5年的病例系列,共531例患者,均在瑞典一家机构由同一位顾问外科医生(P.M.)使用大纹理解剖型乳房植入物进行初次隆胸手术。作者研究了植入物的旋转率以及与可能的诱发因素如术前乳房罩杯大小、分娩史和体重指数之间的相关性。

结果

19例患者(3.58%;95%置信区间,2.17%至5.53%)中共20枚植入物(1.88%;95%置信区间,1.15%至2.89%)发生旋转。其中1例患者(0.22%)双侧植入物均旋转,其余患者为单侧旋转。作者未能证实植入物旋转与既往分娩史或体重指数增加之间存在统计学上的显著相关性。然而,旋转率与术前乳房罩杯大小之间存在关联,随着罩杯大小从A增加到C,旋转率呈上升趋势。

结论

作者认为,如果正确选择植入物并在手术中进行细致的操作及合适的腔隙剥离,旋转率将降至最低,不应将其视为使用解剖型乳房植入物的不利因素。

临床问题/证据级别:风险,III级

相似文献

1
Is Rotation a Concern with Anatomical Breast Implants? A Statistical Analysis of Factors Predisposing to Rotation.解剖型乳房植入物会出现旋转问题吗?对导致旋转的因素的统计分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1367-1378. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003387.
2
Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.艾尔建、曼托和仙特拉轮廓状粘性凝胶乳房植入物的比较:一位外科医生的10年经验
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5):957-966. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001675.
3
Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.在乳房增大修复手术中,最大限度地利用囊下空间和选择植入物类型:对 49 例连续手术和患者满意度评估的回顾。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):828-38. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9704-1. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
4
Fat Graft in Composite Breast Augmentation with Round Implants: A New Concept for Breast Reshaping.圆形假体复合隆胸中的脂肪移植:一种乳房重塑的新概念。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1465-1471. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1240-9. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Secondary Breast Augmentation: Is There a Trend for Bigger Implants?二次隆胸:是否存在更大假体的趋势?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):59-69. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1244-5. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
6
Breast Augmentation with Microtextured Anatomical Implants in 653 Women: Indications and Risk of Rotation.653 例女性采用微纹面解剖型乳房植入物隆乳术:适应证和旋转风险。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):940e-947e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007991.
7
Textured saline-filled breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty: does overfilling prevent deflation? A long-term follow-up.用于隆乳术的纹理状生理盐水填充乳房植入物:过度填充能防止瘪陷吗?一项长期随访研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jul;118(1):215-22; discussion 223. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000220478.38646.9f.
8
The Use of "Precapsular Space" in Secondary Breast Reconstruction.“囊前间隙”在二期乳房重建中的应用
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):716-23. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0683-0. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
Anatomical and Round Breast Implants: How to Select and Indications for Use.解剖型和圆形乳房植入物:如何选择及使用指征。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Aug;136(2):263-272. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001474.
10
Intraoperative Evaluation of Textured Anatomical Implant Rotation: A Prospective Study.纹理解剖植入物旋转的术中评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Sep 1;154(3):490-499. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011072. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Rotation of Anatomical Implants: A Single Surgeon's Experience of over 1500 Patients.解剖植入物的旋转:一位外科医生超过1500例患者的经验
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04897-7.
2
Twelve Years and over 2400 Implants Later: Augmentation Mammoplasty Risk Factors Based on a Single Plastic Surgeon's Experience.十二年及超过2400例隆胸手术后:基于一位整形外科医生经验的隆乳术风险因素
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 5;12(4):e5720. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005720. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Anatomical Breast Implant Assessment Using Ultrasound: A Case Series from the International Breast Implant Check Clinic.
使用超声进行乳房植入物的解剖学评估:来自国际乳房植入物检查诊所的病例系列
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Dec 18;11(12):e5469. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005469. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Evaluation of Different Breast Implant Shapes in the Same Patient: Is There Really a Difference between Round and Anatomical Implants?同一患者不同乳房植入物形状的评估:圆形和解剖形植入物之间真的存在差异吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Sep 25;11(9):e5294. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005294. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Reoperative Augmentation Mammoplasty: An Algorithm to Optimize Soft-Tissue Support, Pocket Control, and Smooth Implant Stability with Composite Reverse Inferior Muscle Sling (CRIMS) and its Technical Variations.再次手术隆乳术:一种优化软组织支撑、口袋控制和使用复合下斜肌反向吊带(CRIMS)及其技术变化实现平滑假体稳定性的算法。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1116-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02726-1. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
6
Cohesive Round Implants and the Risk of Implant Flipping.粘性圆形植入物与植入物翻转风险
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Dec 22;8(12):e3321. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003321. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
Controllable Factors to Reduce the Rate of Complications in Primary Breast Augmentation: A Review of the Literature.可控制因素降低原发性乳房增大术并发症发生率:文献回顾。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Apr;45(2):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01726-x. Epub 2020 May 1.
8
Characteristics of adhesion areas between the tissue expander and capsule in implant-based breast reconstruction.基于植入物的乳房重建中组织扩张器与包膜之间粘连区域的特征
Arch Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;46(4):330-335. doi: 10.5999/aps.2018.00395. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
9
Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method.乳房植入物的选择:使用改良德尔菲法的共识性建议
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 1;7(5):e2237. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002237. eCollection 2019 May.
10
The bioengineered prosthetic breast reconstruction: advancements, evidence, and outcomes.生物工程假体重建乳房:进展、证据与结果。
Gland Surg. 2019 Jun;8(3):271-282. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.08.02.