Bakst Leah, Fleuriet Jérome, Mustari Michael J
Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Vis. 2017 May 1;17(5):13. doi: 10.1167/17.5.13.
Although much is known about volitional and reflexive smooth eye movements individually, much less is known about how they are coordinated. It is hypothesized that separate cortico-ponto-cerebellar loops subserve these different types of smooth eye movements. Specifically, the MT-MST-DLPN pathway is thought to be critical for ocular following eye movements, whereas the FEF-NRTP pathway is understood to be vital for volitional smooth pursuit. However, the role that these loops play in combined volitional and reflexive behavior is unknown. We used a large, textured background moving in conjunction with a small target spot to investigate the eye movements evoked by a combined volitional and reflexive pursuit task. We also assessed the activity of neurons in the smooth eye movement subregion of the frontal eye field (FEFsem). We hypothesized that the pursuit system would show less contribution from the volitional pathway in this task, owing to the increased involvement of the reflexive pathway. In accordance with this hypothesis, a majority of FEFsem neurons (63%) were less active during pursuit maintenance in a combined volitional and reflexive pursuit task than during purely volitional pursuit. Interestingly and surprisingly, the neuronal response to the addition of the large-field motion was highly correlated with the neuronal response to a target blink. This suggests that FEFsem neuronal responses to these different perturbations-whether the addition or subtraction of retinal input-may be related. We conjecture that these findings are due to changing weights of both the volitional and reflexive pathways, as well as retinal and extraretinal signals.
尽管我们对随意性和反射性的平稳眼球运动分别已有很多了解,但对于它们如何协调却知之甚少。据推测,不同的皮质-脑桥-小脑环路分别负责这些不同类型的平稳眼球运动。具体而言,MT-MST-DLPN通路被认为对眼球跟随运动至关重要,而FEF-NRTP通路则被认为对随意性平稳跟踪至关重要。然而,这些环路在随意性和反射性行为相结合时所起的作用尚不清楚。我们使用一个大的、有纹理的背景与一个小目标点一起移动,来研究由随意性和反射性追踪任务组合引发的眼球运动。我们还评估了额叶眼区平稳眼球运动子区域(FEFsem)中神经元的活动。我们假设,在这个任务中,由于反射性通路的参与增加,追踪系统中随意性通路的贡献会减少。根据这一假设,在随意性和反射性追踪任务组合的追踪维持过程中,大多数FEFsem神经元(63%)的活动比在纯随意性追踪过程中要弱。有趣且令人惊讶的是,对添加大视野运动的神经元反应与对目标眨眼的神经元反应高度相关。这表明FEFsem神经元对这些不同干扰(无论是视网膜输入的增加还是减少)的反应可能是相关的。我们推测,这些发现是由于随意性和反射性通路以及视网膜和视网膜外信号权重的变化所致。