文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

下一代射频暴露限值的热模型:评论

Thermal Modeling for the Next Generation of Radiofrequency Exposure Limits: Commentary.

作者信息

Foster Kenneth R, Ziskin Marvin C, Balzano Quirino

机构信息

*Department of Bioengineering University of Pennsylvania; †Temple University Medical School, 3420 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA; ‡Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

出版信息

Health Phys. 2017 Jul;113(1):41-53. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000671.


DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000000671
PMID:28542010
Abstract

This commentary evaluates two sets of guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy, focusing on the frequency range above the "transition" frequency at 3-10 GHz where the guidelines change their basic restrictions from specific absorption rate to incident power density, through the end of the RF band at 300 GHz. The analysis is based on a simple thermal model based on Pennes' bioheat equation (BHTE) (Pennes 1948) assuming purely surface heating; an Appendix provides more details about the model and its range of applicability. This analysis suggests that present limits are highly conservative relative to their stated goals of limiting temperature increase in tissue. As applied to transmitting devices used against the body, they are much more conservative than product safety standards for touch temperature for personal electronics equipment that are used in contact with the body. Provisions in the current guidelines for "averaging time" and "averaging area" are not consistent with scaling characteristics of the bioheat equation and should be refined. The authors suggest the need for additional limits on fluence for protection against brief, high intensity pulses at millimeter wave frequencies. This commentary considers only thermal hazards, which form the basis of the current guidelines, and excludes considerations of reported "non-thermal" effects of exposure that would have to be evaluated in the process of updating the guidelines.

摘要

本评论评估了两套关于人体暴露于射频(RF)能量的指南,重点关注3至10吉赫兹“过渡”频率以上的频率范围,在此频率范围内,指南将其基本限制从比吸收率改为入射功率密度,直至300吉赫兹射频频段结束。该分析基于一个基于彭尼斯生物热方程(BHTE)(彭尼斯,1948年)的简单热模型,假设为纯表面加热;附录提供了有关该模型及其适用范围的更多详细信息。该分析表明,相对于其限制组织温度升高的既定目标,当前的限制极为保守。应用于贴体使用的发射设备时,它们比与身体接触使用的个人电子设备的接触温度产品安全标准要保守得多。当前指南中关于“平均时间”和“平均面积”的规定与生物热方程的缩放特性不一致,应予以完善。作者建议需要对通量进行额外限制,以防范毫米波频率下的短时间高强度脉冲。本评论仅考虑构成当前指南基础的热危害,不包括对已报告的暴露“非热”效应的考虑,这些效应在更新指南的过程中必须进行评估。

相似文献

[1]
Thermal Modeling for the Next Generation of Radiofrequency Exposure Limits: Commentary.

Health Phys. 2017-7

[2]
Modeling Tissue Heating From Exposure to Radiofrequency Energy and Relevance of Tissue Heating to Exposure Limits: Heating Factor.

Health Phys. 2018-8

[3]
Thermal Response of Human Skin to Microwave Energy: A Critical Review.

Health Phys. 2016-12

[4]
The development of biomedical approaches and concepts in radiofrequency radiation protection.

J Microw Power Electromagn Energy. 1986

[5]
Tissue models for RF exposure evaluation at frequencies above 6 GHz.

Bioelectromagnetics. 2018-4

[6]
A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[7]
Simulation of the temperature elevation in children exposed to plane wave electromagnetic fields (10 MHz-1 GHz) at the ICNIRP reference level.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2012-5-31

[8]
Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[9]
A Closer Look at the Thresholds of Thermal Damage: Workshop Report by an ICNIRP Task Group.

Health Phys. 2016-9

[10]
Dosimetric comparison between different quantities for limiting exposure in the RF band: rationale and implications for guidelines.

Health Phys. 2007-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
5G Wireless Communication and Health Effects-A Pragmatic Review Based on Available Studies Regarding 6 to 100 GHz.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019-9-13

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索