Loas Gwenolé, Braun Stéphanie, Delhaye Marie, Linkowski Paul
Department of Psychiatry & Laboratory of Psychiatric Research (ULB 266), Cliniques universitaires de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0177982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177982. eCollection 2017.
This study had two aims. Firstly, the psychometric properties of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Alexithymia Questionnaire for Children (AQC) that measure the three dimensions of alexithymia (DIF, difficulty identifying feelings; DDF, difficulty describing feelings; EOT, externally-oriented thinking) were explored in various samples of children, adolescents or young adults to detect the best factor-structure and to examine if the Externally-Oriented Thinking (EOT) factor must be deleted or not. Secondly, the capacity for adolescents to distinguish between alexithymia and depression was studied using factorial analyses of items of self-report of alexithymia and depression scales. Four groups were examined (80 healthy children, 105 adolescents with various psychiatric disorders, 333 healthy older adolescents and 505 young adults recruited from universities). The first two groups filled out the AQC and the latter two the TAS-20. Confirmatory factorial analyses (CFA) showed that the two-factor model (DIF, DDF) provided acceptable fits and had significant advantages over the three-factor model (DIF, DDF, EOT). Low alpha coefficients for the EOT subscale were reported (range from 0.18-0.61). Except for the children sample, exploratory factorial analyses (EFA) were performed on the items of the TAS-20 or AQC without the EOT items and the Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II) or the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). The items of the AQC and BDI-II or items of the TAS-20 and SDS loaded on separate factors with only a minor overlap suggesting that adolescents were able to differentiate alexithymia and depression when self-assessments were used. Alexithymia can be reliably assessed in adolescents using the TAS-20 or AQC without the eight items rating the EOT dimension.
本研究有两个目的。其一,在儿童、青少年或青年的各类样本中探究20项多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS - 20)和儿童述情障碍问卷(AQC)的心理测量特性,这两个量表用于测量述情障碍的三个维度(DIF,难以识别情感;DDF,难以描述情感;EOT,外向性思维),以找出最佳的因素结构,并检验是否必须删除外向性思维(EOT)因素。其二,通过对述情障碍和抑郁量表的自我报告项目进行因子分析,研究青少年区分述情障碍和抑郁的能力。研究了四组人群(80名健康儿童、105名患有各种精神疾病的青少年、333名健康的大龄青少年和505名从大学招募的青年)。前两组填写AQC,后两组填写TAS - 20。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,双因素模型(DIF,DDF)提供了可接受的拟合度,并且比三因素模型(DIF,DDF,EOT)具有显著优势。报告显示EOT子量表的阿尔法系数较低(范围为0.18 - 0.61)。除儿童样本外,对不含EOT项目的TAS - 20或AQC项目以及贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI - II)或zung自评抑郁量表(SDS)进行了探索性因子分析。AQC和BDI - II的项目或TAS - 20和SDS的项目仅在较小程度上重叠地加载在单独的因子上,这表明在进行自我评估时,青少年能够区分述情障碍和抑郁。使用不含评定EOT维度的八个项目的TAS - 20或AQC,可以可靠地评估青少年的述情障碍。