• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同颈部设计的前牙单颗种植体:一项随机临床试验的 5 年结果。

Anterior single implants with different neck designs: 5 Year results of a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Dental School, Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):717-724. doi: 10.1111/cid.12498. Epub 2017 May 23.

DOI:10.1111/cid.12498
PMID:28544215
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The design of the implant neck might be significant for preservation of marginal bone.

PURPOSE

To compare the 5-year radiographic and clinical outcome of single anterior implants provided with a smooth neck, a rough neck or a scalloped rough neck.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

93 Patients with a missing anterior tooth in the maxilla were included. At random, patients received an implant with a 1.5 mm smooth neck ("smooth group"), a rough neck with grooves ("rough group") or a scalloped rough neck with grooves ("scalloped group"). Implants were installed in healed sites. Follow-up visits were conducted after final crown delivery and 1 year and 5 years later.

RESULTS

Scalloped implants showed significantly more initial marginal bone resorption. The total amount of bone loss was 1.26 ± 0.90 mm in the smooth group, 1.20 ± 1.1 mm in the rough group and 2.28 ± 0.97 mm in the scalloped group (P < .05). Survival rates were 96.2% for the smooth and scalloped group and 100% for the rough group. Scalloped implants showed deeper pocket depths, more bleeding and more technical complications. There were no differences in esthetic outcome nor in patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

For anterior single tooth replacements, scalloped implants show less favorable radiographic and clinical outcome compared to regular implants with a smooth neck or rough neck.

摘要

背景

种植体颈部的设计对于维持边缘骨高度可能具有重要意义。

目的

比较 5 年影像学和临床结果,评估具有光滑颈部、粗糙颈部或锯齿形粗糙颈部的单前牙种植体。

材料和方法

共纳入 93 名上颌缺失单个前牙的患者。随机将患者植入具有 1.5mm 光滑颈部的种植体(“光滑组”)、具有凹槽的粗糙颈部种植体(“粗糙组”)或具有凹槽的锯齿形粗糙颈部种植体(“锯齿组”)。种植体均在愈合的部位植入。在最终牙冠修复后、1 年和 5 年后进行随访。

结果

锯齿种植体显示出明显更多的初始边缘骨吸收。光滑组的总骨损失量为 1.26±0.90mm,粗糙组为 1.20±1.1mm,锯齿组为 2.28±0.97mm(P<0.05)。光滑组和锯齿组的存活率为 96.2%,粗糙组为 100%。锯齿种植体的探诊深度更深,出血更多,技术并发症更多。在美学效果和患者满意度方面没有差异。

结论

对于前牙单牙缺失,与具有光滑颈部或粗糙颈部的常规种植体相比,锯齿种植体的影像学和临床结果较差。

相似文献

1
Anterior single implants with different neck designs: 5 Year results of a randomized clinical trial.不同颈部设计的前牙单颗种植体:一项随机临床试验的 5 年结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):717-724. doi: 10.1111/cid.12498. Epub 2017 May 23.
2
Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial.美学区不同颈部设计的单牙种植体:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1289-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02109.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
3
Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome.不同颈部设计的单颗种植体:评估美学效果的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Jun;15(3):311-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00372.x. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
4
Marginal bone levels and soft tissue conditions around single-tooth implants with a scalloped neck design: results of a prospective 3-year study.单牙种植体颈缘设计呈锯齿状:一项前瞻性 3 年研究的边缘骨水平和软组织状况结果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):550-5. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2544.
5
Treatment outcome of two adjacent implant crowns with different implant platform designs in the aesthetic zone: a 1-year randomized clinical trial.两种不同种植体平台设计的相邻种植体修复体在美学区的治疗效果:一项为期 1 年的随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jan;38(1):74-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01638.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
6
Four modalities of single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic evaluation.上颌前部单颗种植体治疗的四种方式:临床、影像学及美学评估
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Aug;15(4):517-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00417.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
7
Performance of the Straumann Bone Level Implant system for anterior single-tooth replacements in augmented and nonaugmented sites: a prospective cohort study with 60 consecutive patients.Straumann 骨水平种植体系统在前牙单牙缺失中的应用:一项前瞻性队列研究,共纳入 60 例连续患者。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):941-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02486.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: a clinical and radiographic evaluation.上颌前牙区即刻与延期种植:一项临床和影像学评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Jun;14(3):336-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00283.x. Epub 2010 May 11.
9
Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction following full-flap elevation for early and delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a 5-year randomized study.单颗牙种植体早期和延期植入时全瓣翻瓣术后的临床结果及患者满意度:一项5年随机研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):733-43.
10
Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Platform-Switched Implants with a Rough Collar and Platform-Matched Implants with a Smooth Collar: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.带有粗糙颈部的平台转换种植体与带有光滑颈部的平台匹配种植体的临床和影像学结果比较:一项为期1年的随机临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):382-90. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4189.

引用本文的文献

1
Success rates comparison of endodontic microsurgery and single implants with comprehensive and explicit criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于全面且明确标准的牙髓显微外科手术与单颗种植体成功率比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;50(1):e8. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e8. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Influence of rough micro-threaded and laser micro-textured implant-neck on peri-implant tissues: A systematic review.粗糙微螺纹和激光微纹理种植体颈部对种植体周围组织的影响:一项系统评价。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Sep;35(6):602-613. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.025. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3
Multicentre Prospective Study Analysing Relevant Factors Related to Marginal Bone Loss: A Two-Year Evolution.
多中心前瞻性研究分析与边缘骨丢失相关的相关因素:两年进展情况
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(8):185. doi: 10.3390/dj11080185.
4
Dental implant macrodesign features in the past 10 years: A systematic review.过去10年牙种植体的宏观设计特征:一项系统评价。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Mar-Apr;27(2):131-139. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_676_21. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
5
What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体周围炎的流行率是多少?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 19;22(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02493-8.
6
The effect of implant-abutment connections on peri-implant bone levels around single implants in the aesthetic zone: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.种植体-基台连接对美学区单个种植体周围种植体周围骨水平的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Dec;7(6):1025-1036. doi: 10.1002/cre2.471. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
7
How old is old for implant therapy in terms of implant survival and marginal bone levels after 5-11 years?从种植体存活率和边缘骨水平的角度来看,种植体治疗的“年龄”是多少年?即经过 5-11 年后。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Mar;32(3):337-348. doi: 10.1111/clr.13704. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Resistance to Fracture of Zirconia Abutments with Different Angulations: Impact of Implant Platform Diameter.不同角度氧化锆基台的抗断裂性:种植体平台直径的影响
Eur J Dent. 2020 Oct;14(4):517-524. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709947. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
Influence of marginal bone loss on peri-implantitis: Systematic review of literature.边缘骨丢失对种植体周围炎的影响:文献系统综述
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Nov 1;11(11):e1045-e1071. doi: 10.4317/jced.56202. eCollection 2019 Nov.
10
How do peri-implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri-implantitis? A critical review.种植体周围生物学参数与种植体存活率和种植体周围炎的关系如何?一项批判性回顾。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18(Suppl Suppl 18):100-123. doi: 10.1111/clr.13264.