• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从种植体存活率和边缘骨水平的角度来看,种植体治疗的“年龄”是多少年?即经过 5-11 年后。

How old is old for implant therapy in terms of implant survival and marginal bone levels after 5-11 years?

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden.

Department of Periodontology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Mar;32(3):337-348. doi: 10.1111/clr.13704. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1111/clr.13704
PMID:33368735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7986728/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate implant survival and marginal bone levels (MBL ) at least 5 years after implant installation in patients ≥65 years old.

METHODS

Patient records were screened retrospectively for the following inclusion criteria: (1) ≥65 years of age at the time of implant installation, and (2) ≥5-year radiographic follow-up or registered implant loss. Association between patient- and implant-related data with radiographically assessed data [i.e. implant survival, mean MBL (i.e. average of mesial and distal level) and maximum marginal bone loss (i.e. either mesial or distal loss; maximum MBL )] were statistically evaluated by mixed effects multi-level regression models.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-eighteen implants in 74 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 6.2 years (range: 5 to 10.7 years); four early and six late implant losses have been registered (implant survival rate: 95.4%). Mean MBL and maximum MBL was 1.24 ± 0.9 mm and 1.48 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. Maximum MBL  < 2 mm, 2 to 5 mm and ≥5 mm was found in 70.7, 28.8 and 0.5% of the implants, respectively. For both, mean MBL and maximum MBL , age presented a slightly protective effect (mean MBL : Coef. -0.041, p = .016; maximum MBL : Coef. -0.045, p = .014).

CONCLUSION

The high implant survival rate (95.4%), low mean MBL (1.24 mm) and low frequency of maximum MBL  ≥ 5 mm (0.5%) observed herein after 5 to 11 years follow-up suggest that older age should not be considered as a limiting factor for implant treatment.

摘要

目的

评估≥65 岁患者种植体植入后至少 5 年的种植体存活率和边缘骨水平(MBL)。

方法

通过回顾性筛选患者记录,确定以下纳入标准:(1)种植体植入时年龄≥65 岁;(2)影像学随访时间≥5 年或记录到种植体丢失。采用混合效应多级回归模型对患者和种植体相关数据与影像学评估数据(即种植体存活率、平均 MBL(即近远中水平平均值)和最大边缘骨丧失(即近远中任何一侧的最大骨丧失;最大 MBL)之间的关系进行统计学评估。

结果

共纳入 74 例患者的 218 枚种植体,平均随访 6.2 年(范围:5 至 10.7 年);记录到 4 例早期和 6 例晚期种植体丢失(种植体存活率:95.4%)。平均 MBL 和最大 MBL 分别为 1.24±0.9mm 和 1.48±1.0mm。最大 MBL<2mm、2 至 5mm 和≥5mm 的种植体分别占 70.7%、28.8%和 0.5%。对于平均 MBL 和最大 MBL,年龄均表现出轻微的保护作用(平均 MBL:系数-0.041,p=0.016;最大 MBL:系数-0.045,p=0.014)。

结论

本研究在 5 至 11 年的随访后,种植体存活率高(95.4%),平均 MBL 低(1.24mm),最大 MBL≥5mm 的比例低(0.5%),提示年龄不应被视为种植治疗的限制因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f4/7986728/07dc758a5890/CLR-32-337-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f4/7986728/12e29bf640cd/CLR-32-337-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f4/7986728/ff8987507209/CLR-32-337-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f4/7986728/07dc758a5890/CLR-32-337-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f4/7986728/12e29bf640cd/CLR-32-337-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f4/7986728/ff8987507209/CLR-32-337-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f4/7986728/07dc758a5890/CLR-32-337-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
How old is old for implant therapy in terms of implant survival and marginal bone levels after 5-11 years?从种植体存活率和边缘骨水平的角度来看,种植体治疗的“年龄”是多少年?即经过 5-11 年后。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Mar;32(3):337-348. doi: 10.1111/clr.13704. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Marginal Bone Stability Around Tapered, Platform-Shifted Implants Placed with an Immediately Loaded Four-Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthetic Concept: A Cohort Study.采用即刻负重的四颗种植体支持的固定修复理念植入锥形、平台转移种植体周围的边缘骨稳定性:一项队列研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):643-50. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4354.
3
Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting single-unit crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with one cantilever extension. A retrospective study.单基台单冠(SCs)和单端悬臂固定义齿(FDPs)修复体支持的种植体的临床和影像学变化。一项回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):550-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02391.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
4
The Effect of Age of Titanium Dental Implants on Implant Survival and Marginal Bone Resorption: A 5-Year Retrospective Follow-Up Study.钛牙种植体的植入年龄对种植体存留率和边缘骨吸收的影响:一项5年的回顾性随访研究
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Oct 1;46(5):475-479. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00316.
5
Retrospective analysis of bar-retained dentures with cantilever extension: marginal bone level changes around dental implants over time.回顾性分析带有悬臂延伸的杆卡式义齿:随着时间的推移,种植体周围的牙槽骨水平变化。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):385-93.
6
A prospective multicenter 5-year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients.一项对192例患者植入的596颗牙种植体嵴顶骨水平随时间变化进行的前瞻性多中心5年影像学评估。
J Periodontol. 2009 May;80(5):725-33. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080401.
7
Preliminary Study to Evaluate Marginal Bone Loss in Cases of 2- and 3-Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses of the Posterior Mandible.评估下颌后牙区2种植体和3种植体支持的固定局部义齿病例边缘骨吸收的初步研究。
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jun;30(4):1068-1072. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004855.
8
Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study.用于单颗牙缺失修复和三单位固定义齿的氧化锆种植体三年分析:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29(3):290-299. doi: 10.1111/clr.13115. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension. A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of at least 10 years.种植体支持的固定义齿修复体带有悬臂延伸的临床和影像学结果。一项至少随访 10 年的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Dec;31(12):1243-1252. doi: 10.1111/clr.13672. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
10
Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: a 1-year radiographic evaluation.种植体颈部骨吸收的 1 年放射学评价:直径减小的修复基台非潜入式和骨下放置对种植体周围骨变化的影响。
J Periodontol. 2010 Mar;81(3):428-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090317.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of the rapid increase in aged patients on implant dentistry.老年患者数量快速增长对种植牙科的影响。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Apr 30;51(2):71-72. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2025.51.2.71.
2
Cross-sectional analysis comparing prefabricated titanium to individualized hybrid zirconia abutments for cemented zirconia based fixed dental prostheses: a critical concept assessment.比较预制钛与个体化混合氧化锆基台用于黏结氧化锆基固定义齿的横断面分析:关键概念评估。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Mar 18;10(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00529-y.
3
Frailty and mini dental implants.

本文引用的文献

1
How old is old for implant therapy in terms of early implant losses?就早期种植体失败而言,多大年龄算老?
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Dec;46(12):1282-1293. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13199. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
2
Effect of advanced age and/or systemic medical conditions on dental implant survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高龄和/或全身系统性疾病对牙种植体存活率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:311-330. doi: 10.1111/clr.13288.
3
Dental Implant Quality Register-A possible tool to further improve implant treatment and outcome.
衰弱与微型牙种植体
Clin Case Rep. 2023 Dec 9;11(12):e7982. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7982. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Prognosis of Implants with Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Elderly Population: A Retrospective Study with a 5- to 10-Year Follow-Up.老年人群中种植体支持的固定义齿种植体的预后:一项5至10年随访的回顾性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 4;10(7):1250. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071250.
牙种植体质量登记——进一步改善种植体治疗效果的可能工具。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:145-151. doi: 10.1111/clr.13268.
4
The effect of antiresorptive drugs on implant therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.抗吸收药物对种植体治疗的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:54-92. doi: 10.1111/clr.13282.
5
Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: Case definitions and diagnostic considerations.种植体周围健康、种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎:定义和诊断考虑。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S278-S285. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12956.
6
Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition.牙周炎的分期和分级:新分类和病例定义的框架和建议。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S149-S161. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12945.
7
Anterior single implants with different neck designs: 5 Year results of a randomized clinical trial.不同颈部设计的前牙单颗种植体:一项随机临床试验的 5 年结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):717-724. doi: 10.1111/cid.12498. Epub 2017 May 23.
8
Implants for elderly patients.老年患者用植入物。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):228-240. doi: 10.1111/prd.12166.
9
Implants for the aged patient: biological, clinical and sociological considerations.老年患者的植入物:生物学、临床和社会学方面的考虑。
Periodontol 2000. 2016 Oct;72(1):120-34. doi: 10.1111/prd.12133.
10
Dental implants in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人群中的牙种植体:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):920-930. doi: 10.1111/clr.12898. Epub 2016 Jun 7.