Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Dichterbij Innovation and Science, Gennep, The Netherlands.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):159-163. doi: 10.1111/jar.12371. Epub 2017 May 24.
Autonomy support in people with intellectual disability (ID) is an important yet understudied topic. Psychometrically sound instruments are lacking. This study tested the factor structure and reliability of an instrument for assessing the extent people with intellectual disability perceive their support staff as autonomy supportive.
In a single wave, 185 adults with mild-to-borderline intellectual disability filled in an adapted version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (i.e., HCCQ-ID). Forty of them participated in a second wave to determine test-retest-reliability. The HCCQ-ID consists of 15 items on a 5-point Likert scale.
The expected one-factor structure was found. Internal consistency (α = 0.93) and test-retest reliability (r = .85) were good. The score distribution was skewed towards high satisfaction.
The factor structure and reliability of the HCCQ-ID were supported for people with mild-to-borderline intellectual disability. Given the homogeneous factor structure and the high reliability, the number of items may be further optimized.
在智障人士中提供自主性支持是一个重要但研究不足的话题。目前缺乏具有良好心理测量学特性的工具。本研究旨在测试一种评估智障人士感知其支持人员提供自主性支持程度的工具的结构和信度。
在单一时点,185 名轻度至边缘智力障碍的成年人填写了经过改编的健康护理氛围问卷(HCCQ-ID)。其中 40 人参加了第二次测试以确定重测信度。HCCQ-ID 由 15 个 5 点李克特量表组成。
预期的单因素结构得到了验证。内部一致性(α=0.93)和重测信度(r=0.85)良好。得分分布呈高度满意度偏态。
对于轻度至边缘智力障碍者,HCCQ-ID 的结构和信度得到了支持。鉴于同质的因素结构和高可靠性,可以进一步优化项目数量。