de Molon Rafael Scaf, Sakakura Celso Eduardo, Faeda Rafael Silveira, Sartori Rafael, Palhares Daniel, Margonar Rogerio, Marcantonio Elcio
Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Department of Rheumatology, Rheumatology Research and Advanced Therapeutics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Microsc Res Tech. 2017 Sep;80(9):1000-1008. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22894. Epub 2017 May 22.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy on bone healing around osseointegrated implants in the rabbit by means of descriptive histologic and histomorphometric analyses. Eighteen rabbits received one implant each in the right tibia proximal metaphysis. After the bone-healing period of 3 months, 6 randomly selected animals were sacrificed (Group CTL-12) before the immunosuppression therapy initiation to obtain a standard of implant integration. Another six randomly selected animals were submitted to a daily subcutaneous (sc) injection of 10 mg/kg CsA (Group CsA) whereas the six remaining animals received daily sc injections of saline solution (Group CTL-24). Groups CTL-24 and CsA were sacrificed after another 12 weeks. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) within the implant threads were measured. Bone density (BD) and descriptive histological analyses were also accomplished. Rabbits under CsA therapy presented statistically lower percentage of BIC (33.28 ± 6.19) compared to the animals of CLT-24 (55.6 ± 17.73). No differences were found between CsA and CTL-12 (38.7 ± 7.87). Significant decreased percentage of BAFO between the implant threads in the CsA (48.43 ± 9.48) group compared to the CTL-24 (72.26 ± 11.72) was observed. No differences were found between CsA and CTL-12 (61.99 ± 13.94) groups. BD analysis showed significant lower BD in the CsA (48.56 ± 9.32) group compared to the CTL-12 (68.74 ± 10.89) and CTL-24 (77.96 ± 4.96) groups. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that CsA therapy negatively affect the bone healing around osseointegrated implants due to the significant lower values for BIC, BAFO, and BD.
本研究旨在通过描述性组织学和组织形态计量学分析,探讨环孢素A(CsA)治疗对兔骨整合种植体周围骨愈合的影响。18只兔在右胫骨近端干骺端各植入一枚种植体。在3个月的骨愈合期后,在开始免疫抑制治疗前,随机选择6只动物处死(CTL - 12组),以获得种植体整合的标准。另外随机选择6只动物每天皮下注射10 mg/kg CsA(CsA组),其余6只动物每天皮下注射生理盐水(CTL - 24组)。再过12周后,处死CTL - 24组和CsA组动物。测量种植体螺纹内的骨与种植体接触(BIC)和骨面积分数占有率(BAFO)。还进行了骨密度(BD)和描述性组织学分析。与CTL - 24组动物(55.6±17.73)相比,接受CsA治疗的兔BIC百分比在统计学上较低(33.28±6.19)。CsA组与CTL - 12组(38.7±7.87)之间未发现差异。与CTL - 24组(72.26±11.72)相比,CsA组(48.43±9.48)种植体螺纹间的BAFO百分比显著降低。CsA组与CTL - 12组(61.99±13.94)之间未发现差异。BD分析显示,与CTL - 12组(68.74±10.89)和CTL - 24组(77.96±4.96)相比,CsA组(48.56±9.32)的BD显著较低。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,由于BIC、BAFO和BD的值显著较低,CsA治疗对骨整合种植体周围的骨愈合有负面影响。