Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 24;10(1):12446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69455-4.
The objective of this in vivo study was to compare bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values of a new implant, designed to be inserted without bone preparation, using two different preparation protocols: no site preparation and prior limited cortical perforation, versus the values of a control implant using a conventional drilling protocol. Forty-one implants were inserted in 13 rabbits. Thirteen test implants with a new thread design were inserted using no bone preparation (NP), 14 test implants were inserted with limited cortical perforation (CP), and 14 conventional implants served as control. Five animals were sacrificed after 21 days and eight animals after 42 days. Histomorphometric analysis was performed and percentage of BIC and BAFO values were measured. ANOVA with Tukey post hoc and Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests were calculated to compare between the groups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the measured values between any of the groups, neither compered by implant nor by compered day. The results demonstrated that biological osseointegration parameters of implant that was inserted without any bone preparation was non-inferior compared to conventional preparation. The clinical relevance is that novel implant designs may not require bone preparation prior to placement.
本体内研究的目的是比较一种新型植入物的骨-种植体接触(BIC)和骨面积占有率(BAFO)值,该植入物设计为无需骨准备即可植入,使用两种不同的准备方案:不进行部位准备和预先进行有限的皮质穿孔,与使用传统钻孔方案的对照植入物的数值进行比较。将 41 个植入物插入 13 只兔子体内。使用无骨准备(NP)插入了 13 个具有新型螺纹设计的测试植入物,使用有限皮质穿孔(CP)插入了 14 个测试植入物,14 个常规植入物作为对照。5 只动物在 21 天后和 8 只动物在 42 天后被处死。进行了组织形态计量学分析,并测量了 BIC 和 BAFO 值的百分比。通过方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 事后检验以及 Mann-Whitney 非参数检验对各组进行了比较。统计分析显示,任何组之间的测量值均无显著差异,无论是比较植入物还是比较天数。结果表明,无需任何骨准备即可植入的植入物的生物学骨整合参数与传统准备相比不劣。临床意义是,新型植入物设计在植入前可能不需要进行骨准备。