• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲代、母代和传统寄养安置的相对安全性。

The relative safety of paternal, maternal, and traditional foster care placements.

机构信息

College of Public Health and Social Justice, School of Social Work, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.

College of Public Health and Social Justice, School of Social Work, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug;70:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.05.006
PMID:28544874
Abstract

When children are placed into foster care the caseworker must give preference to an adult relative, many of whom are grandparents, over an unrelated caregiver. This kinship preference is based in evolutionary biology, which suggests that the imperative to care for a child should be greater for kin versus non-kin. However, not all kin are related to a child in the same way, and level of paternity uncertainty may influence level of care provided. For instance, maternal grandparents can be assured that they share genetic material with their grandchild, while paternal grandparents may not have the same level of certainty. Owing to the possibility of paternity uncertainty, we hypothesize that out-of-home placements with paternal grandparents will be at a greater risk of subsequent investigations than placements with maternal grandparents or with foster parents. We secured data on placements n=560 of children ages 1.5 to 17 following a maltreatment investigation from a merger of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being NSCAW II and the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System NCANDS. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were used to examine the difference in time to the first new investigation by type of out-of-home placement while controlling for covariates. Consistent with our hypothesis, placements with paternal grandparents were at a higher risk of a subsequent investigations than placements with maternal grandparents or non-kin foster parents. Results suggest a need for further considerations of child safety in foster care based on genetic relatedness of caregivers.

摘要

当儿童被安置在寄养家庭中时,社工必须优先考虑成年亲属,其中许多是祖父母,而不是与儿童没有亲属关系的照顾者。这种亲属偏好基于进化生物学,该生物学表明,照顾孩子的必要性对于亲属来说应该大于非亲属。然而,并非所有亲属都与孩子有相同的关系,并且亲子关系不确定性的程度可能会影响提供的照顾程度。例如,外祖父母可以确信他们与孙子或孙女共享遗传物质,而祖父母则可能没有同样的确定性。由于亲子关系不确定性的可能性,我们假设与外祖父母的家庭外安置比与外祖父母或寄养父母的家庭外安置更有可能随后进行调查。我们从全国儿童和青少年福利调查(NSCAW II)和全国儿童虐待和忽视数据系统(NCANDS)的合并中获得了 560 名在虐待调查后 1.5 至 17 岁儿童的安置数据。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 和多变量 Cox 回归来检查在控制协变量的情况下,不同类型的家庭外安置方式与首次新调查之间的时间差异。与我们的假设一致,与外祖父母的安置相比,与外祖父母或无亲属关系的寄养父母的安置更容易发生后续调查。结果表明,需要进一步考虑基于照顾者遗传关系的寄养儿童的安全问题。

相似文献

1
The relative safety of paternal, maternal, and traditional foster care placements.亲代、母代和传统寄养安置的相对安全性。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug;70:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 22.
2
Child welfare services involvement among the children of young parents in foster care.寄养照料中年轻父母的子女所涉及的儿童福利服务。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Jul;45:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Child Protection Investigations in Out-of-Home Care: Perpetrators, Victims, and Contexts.儿童保护机构对寄养儿童的调查:犯罪者、受害者及相关背景
Child Maltreat. 2015 Nov;20(4):251-7. doi: 10.1177/1077559515597064. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
4
Unintentional child injury in child welfare placements.儿童福利安置中的非故意儿童伤害。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Jan;99:104231. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104231. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
The influence of caregiver depression on children in non-relative foster care versus kinship care placements.照顾者抑郁对非亲属寄养儿童与亲属寄养儿童的影响。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):459-67. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1525-9.
6
Maltreatment following reunification: predictors of subsequent Child Protective Services contact after children return home.团聚后的虐待:儿童回家后后续儿童保护服务接触的预测因素。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Apr;33(4):218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.005. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
7
Family matters? The effect of kinship care on foster care disruption rates.家庭因素?亲属照料对寄养关系破裂率的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Oct;48:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
8
Health status and type of out-of-home placement: informal kinship care in an investigated sample.健康状况与家庭外安置类型:被调查样本中的非正式亲属照料
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Nov-Dec;14(6):559-64. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
9
The physical, developmental, and mental health needs of young children in child welfare by initial placement type.按初次安置类型划分的儿童福利中幼儿的身体、发育和心理健康需求。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005 Jun;26(3):177-85. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200506000-00003.
10
Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care?谁会在寄养和亲属照料安置中受到干扰?
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Apr;30(4):409-24. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.004. Epub 2006 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Foster Care, Kinship Care, and the Transition to Adulthood: Do Child Welfare System Processes Explain Differences in Outcomes?寄养、亲属照料与成年过渡:儿童福利系统流程能否解释结果差异?
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2023 Oct;153. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107098. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Kinship Care and Child Protection in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.高收入国家的亲属照顾和儿童保护:范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Apr;24(2):632-645. doi: 10.1177/15248380211036073. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
3
Research Participation of Minor Adolescents in Foster Care.
未成年人在寄养中的研究参与。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021 Apr;34(2):190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
A model explaining the matrilateral bias in alloparental investment.一个解释亲缘偏利他投资的模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 29;114(35):9290-9295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705910114. Epub 2017 Aug 15.