Eriksson Crommert Martin, Tucker Kylie, Holford Christopher, Wight Alexander, McCook Donna, Hodges Paul
University Health Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017 Aug;35:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 17.
Controversy exists in the literature regarding antagonist activity of trunk muscles during different types of trunk loading, and the direction-specificity of activation of trunk muscles, particularly the deeper trunk muscles. This study aimed to systematically compare activation of a range of trunk muscles between directions of statically applied loads, and to consider the impact of breathing in this activation. In a semi-seated position, 13 healthy male participants resisted moderate inertial loads applied to the trunk in eight different directions. Intramuscular electromyography was recorded from eight abdominal and back muscles on the right side during 1s prior to peak inspiration/expiration. All muscles demonstrated a directional preference of activation. No muscle displayed antagonistic activation during loading conditions of an intensity that exceded that recorded in upright sitting without a load. During these moderate intensity sustained efforts, trunk muscle activation varied little between respiratory phases. Antagonistic muscle activation of amplitude equivalent to the activation recorded in upright sitting without load is sufficient to maintain control of the spine during predictable and sustained low load tasks.
关于在不同类型的躯干负荷期间躯干肌肉的拮抗肌活动以及躯干肌肉(尤其是深层躯干肌肉)激活的方向特异性,文献中存在争议。本研究旨在系统比较静态施加负荷的不同方向之间一系列躯干肌肉的激活情况,并考虑呼吸对这种激活的影响。在半坐位时,13名健康男性参与者抵抗在八个不同方向施加于躯干的中等惯性负荷。在吸气/呼气峰值前1秒期间,从右侧的八块腹部和背部肌肉记录肌内肌电图。所有肌肉均表现出激活的方向偏好。在强度超过无负荷直立坐姿记录值的负荷条件下,没有肌肉表现出拮抗肌激活。在这些中等强度的持续用力过程中,呼吸阶段之间躯干肌肉激活变化很小。与无负荷直立坐姿记录的激活幅度相当的拮抗肌激活足以在可预测的持续低负荷任务期间维持对脊柱的控制。