School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
LAMHESS, Université Côte d'azur, Nice, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 Sep;123(9):1879-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05193-5. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
Redundancy of the musculoskeletal system implies multiple strategies are theoretically available to coordinate back extensor muscles. This study investigated whether coordination between back muscles during a tightly constrained isometric trunk extension task varies within and between individuals, and whether this changes following brief exposure to activation feedback of a muscle.
Nine healthy participants performed three blocks of two repetitions of ramped isometric trunk extension in side-lying against resistance from 0-30% of maximum voluntary contraction over 30 s (force feedback). Between blocks, participants repeated contractions with visual feedback of electromyography (EMG) from either superficial (SM) or deep multifidus (DM), in two conditions; 'After SM' and 'After DM'. Intramuscular EMG was recorded from SM, DM, and longissimus (LG) simultaneously with shear wave elastography (SWE) from SM or DM.
In the 'Natural' condition (force feedback only), group data showed incremental increases in EMG with force, with minor changes in distribution of activation between muscles as force increased. SM was the most active muscle during the 'Natural' condition, but with DM most active in some participants. Individual data showed that coordination between muscles differed substantially between repetitions and individuals. Brief exposure to EMG feedback altered coordination. SWE showed individual variation, but findings differed from EMG.
This study revealed substantial variation in coordination between back extensor muscles within and between participants, and after exposure to feedback, in a tightly constrained task. Shear modulus revealed similar variation, but with an inconsistent relationship to EMG. These data highlight highly flexible control of back muscles.
肌肉骨骼系统的冗余意味着在理论上有多种策略可用于协调背部伸肌。本研究旨在探讨在严格限制的等长躯干伸展任务中,背部肌肉的协调性是否在个体内部和个体之间发生变化,以及这种变化是否会在短暂接触肌肉激活反馈后发生改变。
9 名健康参与者在侧卧位置下进行了三个块的两次重复的斜坡等长躯干伸展,阻力来自 0-30%的最大自主收缩,持续 30 秒(力反馈)。在块之间,参与者在两种条件下重复进行视觉反馈的肌电图(EMG)来自浅层(SM)或深层多裂肌(DM)的收缩:“After SM”和“After DM”。同时用剪切波弹性成像(SWE)从 SM 或 DM 记录 SM、DM 和竖脊肌(LG)的肌内 EMG。
在“自然”条件(仅力反馈)下,组数据显示 EMG 随力呈递增增加,随着力的增加,肌肉激活的分布略有变化。在“自然”条件下,SM 是最活跃的肌肉,但在某些参与者中,DM 最活跃。个体数据显示,肌肉之间的协调性在重复和个体之间存在很大差异。短暂接触 EMG 反馈会改变协调。SWE 显示出个体差异,但与 EMG 的结果不同。
本研究在严格受限的任务中揭示了个体内部和个体之间背部伸肌之间的协调存在很大差异,并且在接触反馈后会发生变化。剪切模量显示出相似的变化,但与 EMG 的关系不一致。这些数据突出了背部肌肉高度灵活的控制。