• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度尼西亚登革热负担评估:专家小组对证据的审查。

Indonesian dengue burden estimates: review of evidence by an expert panel.

作者信息

Wahyono T Y M, Nealon J, Beucher S, Prayitno A, Moureau A, Nawawi S, Thabrany H, Nadjib M

机构信息

Center for Health Economics and Policy Studies, Universitas Indonesia,Depok,Indonesia.

Sanofi Pasteur,Asia & JPAC Region,Singapore.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Aug;145(11):2324-2329. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817001030. Epub 2017 May 26.

DOI:10.1017/S0950268817001030
PMID:28545598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5647663/
Abstract

Routine, passive surveillance systems tend to underestimate the burden of communicable diseases such as dengue. When empirical methods are unavailable, complimentary opinion-based or extrapolative methods have been employed. Here, an expert Delphi panel estimated the proportion of dengue captured by the Indonesian surveillance system, and associated health system parameters. Following presentation of medical and epidemiological data and subsequent discussions, the panel made iterative estimates from which expansion factors (EF), the ratio of total:reported cases, were calculated. Panelists estimated that of all symptomatic Indonesian dengue episodes, 57·8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 46·6-59·8) enter healthcare facilities to seek treatment; 39·3% (95% CI 32·8-42·0) are diagnosed as dengue; and 20·3% (95% CI 16·1-24·3) are subsequently reported in the surveillance system. They estimated most hospitalizations occur in the public sector, while ~55% of ambulatory episodes are seen privately. These estimates gave an overall EF of 5·00; hospitalized EF of 1·66; and ambulatory EF of 34·01 which, when combined with passive surveillance data, equates to an annual average (2006-2015) of 612 005 dengue cases, and 183 297 hospitalizations. These estimates are lower than those published elsewhere, perhaps due to case definitions, local clinical perceptions and treatment-seeking behavior. These findings complement global burden estimates, support health economic analyses, and can be used to inform decision-making.

摘要

常规的被动监测系统往往会低估登革热等传染病的负担。在缺乏实证方法时,已采用基于专家意见或推断的补充方法。在此,一个专家德尔菲小组估计了印度尼西亚监测系统所捕获的登革热病例比例以及相关的卫生系统参数。在展示医学和流行病学数据并随后进行讨论之后,该小组进行了反复估计,并据此计算了扩展因子(EF),即总病例数与报告病例数的比率。小组成员估计,在所有出现症状的印度尼西亚登革热病例中,57.8%(95%置信区间[CI]46.6 - 59.8)会前往医疗机构寻求治疗;39.3%(95%CI 32.8 - 42.0)被诊断为登革热;随后有20.3%(95%CI 16.1 - 24.3)在监测系统中被报告。他们估计大多数住院病例发生在公共部门,而约55%的门诊病例是在私立机构就诊。这些估计得出总体扩展因子为5.00;住院扩展因子为1.66;门诊扩展因子为34.01,将这些与被动监测数据相结合,相当于2006 - 2015年的年平均登革热病例数为612,005例,住院病例数为183,297例。这些估计值低于其他地方公布的数值,可能是由于病例定义、当地临床认知和就医行为等原因。这些发现补充了全球负担估计,支持卫生经济分析,并可用于为决策提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b7/9507418/b8a6dc99972c/S0950268817001030_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b7/9507418/b8a6dc99972c/S0950268817001030_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b7/9507418/b8a6dc99972c/S0950268817001030_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Indonesian dengue burden estimates: review of evidence by an expert panel.印度尼西亚登革热负担评估:专家小组对证据的审查。
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Aug;145(11):2324-2329. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817001030. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Economic burden of dengue in Indonesia.印度尼西亚登革热的经济负担。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jan 10;13(1):e0007038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007038. eCollection 2019 Jan.
3
Economic cost and burden of dengue in the Philippines.菲律宾登革热的经济成本与负担。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb;92(2):360-366. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0139. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
4
Symptomatic Dengue Disease in Five Southeast Asian Countries: Epidemiological Evidence from a Dengue Vaccine Trial.五个东南亚国家的有症状登革热疾病:来自一项登革热疫苗试验的流行病学证据
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Aug 17;10(8):e0004918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004918. eCollection 2016 Aug.
5
[Data quality of dengue epidemiological surveillance in Belo Horizonte, Southeastern Brazil].[巴西东南部贝洛奥里藏特登革热流行病学监测的数据质量]
Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Feb;40(1):134-42. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006000100021. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
6
Approaches to refining estimates of global burden and economics of dengue.登革热全球负担及经济学估算的细化方法。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Nov 20;8(11):e3306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003306. eCollection 2014 Nov.
7
Dengue epidemiology in selected endemic countries: factors influencing expansion factors as estimates of underreporting.部分流行国家的登革热流行病学:影响作为漏报估计值的扩展因素的因素。
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Jul;20(7):840-63. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12498. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
The Epidemiology, Virology and Clinical Findings of Dengue Virus Infections in a Cohort of Indonesian Adults in Western Java.西爪哇一群印度尼西亚成年人登革病毒感染的流行病学、病毒学及临床发现
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Feb 12;10(2):e0004390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004390. eCollection 2016 Feb.
9
Impact of a Nonfatal Dengue Episode on Disability-Adjusted Life Years: A Systematic Analysis.非重症登革热发病对伤残调整生命年的影响:系统分析。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Dec;99(6):1458-1465. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0309.
10
Sensitivity of the Dengue Surveillance System in Brazil for Detecting Hospitalized Cases.巴西登革热监测系统对检测住院病例的敏感性。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 May 18;10(5):e0004705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004705. eCollection 2016 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge gaps and socio-demographic disparities in dengue awareness among high-risk communities in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.坦桑尼亚高危社区登革热认知方面的知识差距和社会人口学差异:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):2156. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22379-y.
2
Estimating dengue disease and economic burden to inform municipal-level policymakers: Method for a pragmatic city-level observational cohort study.估算登革热疾病和经济负担,为市级政策制定者提供信息:实用的市级观察队列研究方法。
Gates Open Res. 2024 Aug 8;8:3. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.15015.3. eCollection 2024.
3
Utility of surveillance data for planning for dengue elimination in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a scenario-tree modelling approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptomatic Dengue Disease in Five Southeast Asian Countries: Epidemiological Evidence from a Dengue Vaccine Trial.五个东南亚国家的有症状登革热疾病:来自一项登革热疫苗试验的流行病学证据
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Aug 17;10(8):e0004918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004918. eCollection 2016 Aug.
2
The global burden of dengue: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.登革热的全球负担:来自《2013年全球疾病负担研究》的分析
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;16(6):712-723. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00026-8. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
3
The Epidemiology, Virology and Clinical Findings of Dengue Virus Infections in a Cohort of Indonesian Adults in Western Java.
印度尼西亚日惹利用监测数据规划登革热消除:情景树建模方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013313.
4
Impact of randomised mel deployments on notified dengue cases and insecticide fogging for dengue control in Yogyakarta City.随机部署灭蚊器对雅加达市登革热病例报告和控制登革热的杀虫剂喷雾的影响。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2166650. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2166650.
5
Different domains of dengue research in the Philippines: A systematic review and meta-analysis of questionnaire-based studies.菲律宾登革热研究的不同领域:基于问卷的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 20;16(12):e0261412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261412. eCollection 2021.
6
Surface plasmon resonance analysis for detecting non-structural protein 1 of dengue virus in Indonesia.用于检测印度尼西亚登革病毒非结构蛋白1的表面等离子体共振分析
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Aug;27(8):1931-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
7
Causality Analysis of Google Trends and Dengue Incidence in Bandung, Indonesia With Linkage of Digital Data Modeling: Longitudinal Observational Study.谷歌趋势与印度尼西亚万隆登革热发病率的因果关系分析:基于数字数据建模的纵向观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 24;22(7):e17633. doi: 10.2196/17633.
8
Untapped Potential: A Qualitative Study of a Hospital-Based Dengue Surveillance System.未开发的潜力:基于医院的登革热监测系统的定性研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1):120-131. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0719. Epub 2020 May 7.
9
Evaluation of Health Information System (HIS) in The Surveillance of Dengue in Indonesia: Lessons from Case in Bandung, West Java.评估印度尼西亚登革热监测中的健康信息系统(HIS):来自西爪哇万隆案例的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;17(5):1795. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051795.
10
Spatiotemporal variability in dengue transmission intensity in Jakarta, Indonesia.印度尼西亚雅加达登革热传播强度的时空变异性。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Mar 6;14(3):e0008102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008102. eCollection 2020 Mar.
西爪哇一群印度尼西亚成年人登革病毒感染的流行病学、病毒学及临床发现
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Feb 12;10(2):e0004390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004390. eCollection 2016 Feb.
4
Dengue epidemiology in selected endemic countries: factors influencing expansion factors as estimates of underreporting.部分流行国家的登革热流行病学:影响作为漏报估计值的扩展因素的因素。
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Jul;20(7):840-63. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12498. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Economic cost and burden of dengue in the Philippines.菲律宾登革热的经济成本与负担。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb;92(2):360-366. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0139. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
Economic and disease burden of dengue illness in India.印度登革热疾病的经济负担和疾病负担
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Dec;91(6):1235-1242. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0002. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
7
The changing incidence of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Indonesia: a 45-year registry-based analysis.印度尼西亚登革出血热发病率的变化:基于 45 年登记的分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 26;14:412. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-412.
8
The global distribution and burden of dengue.登革热的全球分布和负担。
Nature. 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):504-7. doi: 10.1038/nature12060. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
9
Use of expansion factors to estimate the burden of dengue in Southeast Asia: a systematic analysis.使用膨胀系数估计东南亚登革热负担:系统分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(2):e2056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002056. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
10
Four dengue virus serotypes found circulating during an outbreak of dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in Jakarta, Indonesia, during 2004.2004年在印度尼西亚雅加达登革热和登革出血热疫情期间发现有四种登革病毒血清型在传播。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Sep;100(9):855-62. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.11.010. Epub 2006 Feb 28.