Yao Yuan, Zhang Huiyu, Liu Huan, Zhang Zhengfeng, Tang Yu, Zhou Yue
Department of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Stomatology, 457th Hospital of PLA, Wuhan, China.
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:660-667. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.076. Epub 2017 May 22.
Anterior debridement/bone grafting/posterior instrumentation is a common selection for the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LST). To date, no study has focused on the prognostic factors for recovery after this surgery.
We included 144 patients who experienced anterior debridement/bone grafting/posterior instrumentation for LST. The recovery rate based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used to assess recovery. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to identify the prognostic factors for recovery postoperatively. For the prognostic factors worth further consideration, the changes in JOA scores within the 24-month follow-up period were identified by repeated-measures analysis of variance.
Paralysis/nonparalysis, duration of symptoms (≥3/<3 months), number of involved vertebrae (>2/≤2), and posterior open/percutaneous instrumentation were identified as prognostic factors for recovery postoperatively. The prognostic factor of open/percutaneous instrumentation was then further compared for potential clinical application. Patients in the percutaneous instrumentation group achieved higher JOA scores than those in the open instrumentation group in the early stages postoperatively (1-3 months), but this effect equalized at 6 months postoperatively. Patients in the open instrumentation group experienced longer operation time and less cost than those in the percutaneous instrumentation group.
Nonparalysis, shorter symptom duration, fewer involved vertebrae, and posterior percutaneous instrumentation (compared with open instrumentation) are considered favorable prognostic factors. Patients in the percutaneous instrumentation group achieved higher JOA scores than those in the open instrumentation group in the early stages postoperatively (1-3 months), but no significant difference was observed in long-term JOA scores (6-24 months).
前路清创/植骨/后路内固定术是治疗腰椎结核(LST)的常用选择。迄今为止,尚无研究关注该手术后恢复的预后因素。
我们纳入了144例行前路清创/植骨/后路内固定术治疗LST的患者。基于日本骨科协会(JOA)评分的恢复率用于评估恢复情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归分析确定术后恢复的预后因素。对于值得进一步考虑的预后因素,通过重复测量方差分析确定24个月随访期内JOA评分的变化。
瘫痪/未瘫痪、症状持续时间(≥3/<3个月)、受累椎体数量(>2/≤2)以及后路开放/经皮内固定被确定为术后恢复的预后因素。然后进一步比较开放/经皮内固定的预后因素以探讨其潜在临床应用价值。经皮内固定组患者术后早期(1 - 3个月)的JOA评分高于开放内固定组,但在术后6个月时这种差异消失。开放内固定组患者的手术时间更长,费用低于经皮内固定组。
未瘫痪、症状持续时间较短、受累椎体较少以及后路经皮内固定(与开放内固定相比)被认为是有利的预后因素。经皮内固定组患者术后早期(1 - 3个月)的JOA评分高于开放内固定组,但长期JOA评分(6 - 24个月)无显著差异。