Suppr超能文献

单阶段后路清创、植骨融合内固定与一期前路清创、植骨融合后路内固定治疗胸段及胸腰段脊柱结核的对比研究

Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation with single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis.

作者信息

Zhou Yongchun, Li Weiwei, Liu Jun, Gong Liqun, Luo Jing

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, 256# You-yi West Road, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.

Department of Nursing administration, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, 555# You-yi East Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0405-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical efficacy of single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation with that of single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation for treatment of adult patients with thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis (TB).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 64 adult patients with thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal TB who underwent surgery between January 2011 and December 2014. Of the 64 patients, 34 patients were treated using a single posterior-only approach (posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation; Group A). Thirty patients were treated with a combined anterior and posterior approach (single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation; Group B). Clinical manifestations, laboratory and imaging results were subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean (±standard deviation) duration of follow-up was 16.8 ± 1.4 months (range, 10-34). Bony fusion was achieved in all the bone grafts with no loosening or breakage of internal fixation. In both of the groups, the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, ESR and CRP at 6 weeks after operation and at the most recent follow-up were significantly lower than the preoperative level (p < 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay in group A were significantly less than those in group B (P < 0.05). As of most recent follow-up, no significant between-group difference was observed with respect to the American Spinal Injury Association classification status (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant between-group difference was observed with respect to preoperative kyphosis angle, and postoperative angle correction and angle correction rate (P > 0.05). One patient in group A relapsed 20 months after operation, and was successfully treated with debridement using the combined anterior and posterior approach.

CONCLUSION

Single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation for treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal TB can achieve similar curative effect as that with single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation, and is associated with additional advantages of shorter operation time, less bleeding and shorter length of hospital stay.

摘要

背景

比较单纯后路清创、植骨融合内固定术与一期前路清创、植骨融合及后路内固定术治疗成人胸段及胸腰段脊柱结核的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2014年12月期间接受手术治疗的64例成人胸段及胸腰段脊柱结核患者。64例患者中,34例采用单纯后路手术(后路清创、植骨融合内固定术;A组)。30例采用前后联合入路手术(一期前路清创、植骨融合及后路内固定术;B组)。对患者的临床表现、实验室及影像学结果进行统计分析。

结果

平均(±标准差)随访时间为16.8±1.4个月(范围10 - 34个月)。所有植骨均达到骨性融合,内固定无松动或断裂。两组患者术后6周及末次随访时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、血沉(ESR)及C反应蛋白(CRP)均显著低于术前水平(P < 0.05)。A组手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间均显著少于B组(P < 0.05)。至末次随访时,两组间美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级情况差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。此外,两组术前后凸角、术后角度矫正及角度矫正率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。A组1例患者术后20个月复发,采用前后联合入路清创成功治愈。

结论

单纯后路清创、植骨融合内固定术治疗胸段及胸腰段脊柱结核与一期前路清创、植骨融合及后路内固定术疗效相当,且具有手术时间短、出血少、住院时间短等优点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c4d/6122740/ad5dc9c19dcf/12893_2018_405_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验