Zamani-Alavijeh Fereshteh, Shahry Parvin, Kalhori Maryam, Araban Marzieh
Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Apr 19;6:20. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.204738. eCollection 2017.
The rate of caesarean delivery is increasing worldwide. Maternal beliefs may be influential on the mode of delivery. This study aimed to validate pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire among pregnant women.
This was a cross-sectional study which was done in Ahvaz Public and Private Health Care Centers. A total of 342 low-risk pregnant women were included in a study conducted in spring 2011 in Ahvaz, Iran. After careful consideration and performing content and face validity, a 62-item measure was developed and subjects completed the questionnaire. Reliability was estimated using internal consistency and validity was assessed by performing face, content and structure and discriminate validity. Data were analyzed using explanatory factor analysis, -test, and correlations in SPSS 16.
The findings of content and face validity showed almost perfect results for both content validity ratio = 1 and content validity index = 1. The explanatory factor analysis indicated a 7-subscale measure (Eigenvalue >1, factor loading >0.4), and discriminate validity revealed satisfying results < 0.05 for 6 out of 7 subscales. Internal consistency as measured by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was acceptable for subscales.
In general, the findings suggest that this newly generated scale is a reliable and valid specific questionnaire for assessing pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery. However, further studies are needed to establish stronger psychometric properties for the questionnaire.
全球剖宫产率正在上升。产妇的观念可能会对分娩方式产生影响。本研究旨在验证孕妇分娩方式偏好问卷在孕妇中的有效性。
这是一项在阿瓦士公立和私立医疗保健中心进行的横断面研究。2011年春季在伊朗阿瓦士开展的一项研究共纳入了342名低风险孕妇。经过仔细考虑并进行内容效度和表面效度评估后,编制了一份包含62个条目的量表,研究对象完成了该问卷。使用内部一致性来估计信度,并通过表面效度、内容效度、结构效度和区分效度来评估效度。在SPSS 16中使用解释性因子分析、t检验和相关性分析对数据进行分析。
内容效度和表面效度的结果显示,内容效度比=1,内容效度指数=1,几乎得到了完美的结果。解释性因子分析表明该量表有7个分量表(特征值>1,因子载荷>0.4),区分效度显示7个分量表中有6个的结果令人满意(P<0.05)。各分量表以Cronbach's alpha系数衡量的内部一致性是可接受的。
总体而言,研究结果表明,这个新编制的量表是一个可靠且有效的特定问卷,用于评估孕妇对分娩方式的偏好。然而,需要进一步研究以确立该问卷更强的心理测量学特性。