Lorenz Andrea, Leichtle Carmen I, Frantz Sandra, Bumann Marte, Tsiflikas Ilias, Shiozawa Thomas, Leichtle Ulf G
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Spine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Rottenburg, Germany.
Orthop Surg. 2017 May;9(2):229-236. doi: 10.1111/os.12322. Epub 2017 May 26.
To analyze the potential of the dual outer diameter screw and systematically evaluate the pull-out force of the dual outer diameter screw compared to the uncemented and cemented standard pedicle screws with special regard to the pedicle diameter and the vertebra level.
Sixty vertebrae of five human spines (T -L ) were sorted into three study groups for pairwise comparison of the uncemented dual outer diameter screw, the uncemented standard screw, and the cemented standard screw, and randomized with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebra level. The vertebrae were instrumented, insertion torque was determined, and pull-out testing was performed using a material testing machine. Failure load was evaluated in pairwise comparison within each study group. The screw-to-pedicle diameter ratio was determined and the uncemented dual outer diameter and standard screws were compared for different ratios as well as vertebra levels.
Significantly increased pull-out forces were measured for the cemented standard screw compared to the uncemented standard screw (+689 N, P < 0.001) and the dual outer diameter screw (+403 N, P < 0.001). Comparing the dual outer diameter screw to the uncemented standard screw in the total study group, a distinct but not significant increase was measured (+149 N, P = 0.114). Further analysis of these two screws, however, revealed a significant increase of pull-out force for the dual outer diameter screw in the lumbar region (+247 N, P = 0.040), as well as for a screw-to-pedicle diameter ratio between 0.6 and 1 (+ 488 N, P = 0.028).
For clinical application, cement augmentation remains the gold standard for increasing screw stability. According to our results, the use of a dual outer diameter screw is an interesting option to increase screw stability in the lumbar region without cement augmentation. For the thoracic region, however, the screw-to-pedicle diameter should be checked and attention should be paid to screw cut out, if the dual outer diameter screw is considered.
分析双外径螺钉的潜力,并系统评估双外径螺钉与非骨水泥和骨水泥标准椎弓根螺钉相比的拔出力,特别关注椎弓根直径和椎体节段。
将五具人体脊柱(T - L )的60个椎体分为三个研究组,用于对非骨水泥双外径螺钉、非骨水泥标准螺钉和骨水泥标准螺钉进行两两比较,并根据骨密度(BMD)和椎体节段进行随机分组。对椎体进行器械植入,测定插入扭矩,并使用材料试验机进行拔出试验。在每个研究组内进行两两比较,评估失效载荷。确定螺钉与椎弓根直径的比值,并比较不同比值以及椎体节段的非骨水泥双外径螺钉和标准螺钉。
与非骨水泥标准螺钉(+689 N,P < 0.001)和双外径螺钉(+403 N,P < 0.001)相比,骨水泥标准螺钉的拔出力显著增加。在整个研究组中,将双外径螺钉与非骨水泥标准螺钉进行比较,测得有明显但不显著的增加(+149 N,P = 0.114)。然而,对这两种螺钉的进一步分析显示,双外径螺钉在腰椎区域的拔出力显著增加(+247 N,P = 0.040),以及在螺钉与椎弓根直径比值在0.6至1之间时也显著增加(+488 N,P = 0.028)。
对于临床应用,骨水泥增强仍然是提高螺钉稳定性的金标准。根据我们的结果,使用双外径螺钉是在不进行骨水泥增强的情况下增加腰椎区域螺钉稳定性的一个有趣选择。然而,对于胸椎区域,如果考虑使用双外径螺钉,应检查螺钉与椎弓根直径的比值,并注意螺钉穿出情况。