Mason Ross J, Atwell Thomas D, Lohse Christine, Bhindi Bimal, Weisbrod Adam, Boorjian Stephen A, Leibovich Bradley C, Schmit Grant D, Thompson R Houston
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):544-549. doi: 10.1111/bju.13917. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
To compare renal functional changes after percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) or partial nephrectomy (PN).
Patients who underwent PCA or PN for a solitary renal mass at a single institution were identified (2003-2013). Estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were calculated at baseline, discharge, and at the 3-month follow-up using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Changes in renal function were compared between groups using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching, adjustment for PS quintile, and inverse probability weighting (IPW).
There were 2 040 procedures available for the PS analyses, including 448 PCA and 1 592 PN. After PS adjustments, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical features between PCA and PN patients. In the PS-matched analysis, the change in eGFR from baseline to discharge for PCA and PN patients was -3.1 and -1.1 mL/min/1.73 m , respectively (P = 0.038), with percentage changes of -4.5% and 0% respectively (P = 0.006). From baseline to the 3-month follow-up, the absolute change in eGFR for PCA and PN patients was -4.3 and -2.1 mL/min/1.73 m , respectively (P = 0.008), and the percentage change was -6.1% and -2.4% respectively (P = 0.005). Similar results were obtained after adjusting for PS quintiles and in the IPW analysis. Importantly, the rate of chronic kidney disease stage progression at the 3-month follow-up was similar between the groups (21% vs 18%).
Our results confirm that both PCA and PN have a minor impact on renal function. While we observed a statistically greater decline in eGFR after PCA compared with PN, both approaches result in excellent preservation of renal function.
比较经皮冷冻消融术(PCA)或肾部分切除术(PN)后肾功能的变化。
确定在单一机构因孤立性肾肿块接受PCA或PN治疗的患者(2003 - 2013年)。使用慢性肾脏病流行病学合作组方程在基线、出院时和3个月随访时计算估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。采用1:1倾向评分(PS)匹配、PS五分位数调整和逆概率加权(IPW)比较两组间肾功能的变化。
有2040例手术可用于PS分析,包括448例PCA和1592例PN。PS调整后,PCA和PN患者的基线临床特征无显著差异。在PS匹配分析中,PCA和PN患者从基线到出院时eGFR的变化分别为-3.1和-1.1 mL/min/1.73 m²(P = 0.038),百分比变化分别为-4.5%和0%(P = 0.006)。从基线到3个月随访时,PCA和PN患者eGFR的绝对变化分别为-4.3和-2.1 mL/min/1.73 m²(P = 0.008),百分比变化分别为-6.1%和-2.4%(P = 0.005)。在调整PS五分位数后及IPW分析中获得了相似结果。重要的是,两组在3个月随访时慢性肾脏病分期进展率相似(21%对18%)。
我们的结果证实PCA和PN对肾功能均有轻微影响。虽然我们观察到与PN相比,PCA后eGFR在统计学上下降幅度更大,但两种方法均能很好地保留肾功能。