• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

劣质和假冒药品:基于 2007 年至 2016 年发表的数据进行的流行率和风险的系统评估。

Poor-Quality and Counterfeit Drugs: A Systematic Assessment of Prevalence and Risks Based on Data Published From 2007 to 2016.

机构信息

Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany.

Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany.

出版信息

J Pharm Sci. 2017 Oct;106(10):2921-2929. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.xphs.2017.05.018
PMID:28549909
Abstract

Counterfeit drugs can hurt patients and harm the pharmaceutical industry. In 2006, the International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce expressed a need to generate more and better data to calculate a worldwide prevalence of counterfeiting. This review analyzes field test data that were published in the time frame January 2007 to December 2016, were accessible via Pubmed, and which addressed the prevalence of counterfeit drugs. Based on the 41 studies identified, it is still not possible to make a reliable statement about the prevalence of counterfeit drugs due to the heterogeneity of the results. To make further progress in this area, both the quantity and quality of documented field tests should be increased. Without a differentiated analysis considering therapeutic class, source, and country of counterfeit drugs, it will remain difficult to identify the root causes of market infiltration and useful points of attack to combat them. Studies with high sample power and randomized sampling, packaging inspection, and detailed chemical analysis will be necessary to correctly identify (especially professional) counterfeit samples. The classification system presented in this review should help to calculate not only the prevalence of counterfeit drugs but also the risks to the patient associated with different types of counterfeited medicines.

摘要

假药会伤害患者并损害制药行业。2006 年,国际医药产品打假专题组表示需要生成更多更好的数据来计算全球假药的流行率。本综述分析了 2007 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间发表的、可通过 Pubmed 获取的、涉及假药流行率的现场测试数据。基于确定的 41 项研究,由于结果的异质性,仍然无法就假药的流行率做出可靠的陈述。为了在这一领域取得进一步进展,应增加记录现场测试的数量和质量。如果不考虑假药的治疗类别、来源和国家进行差异化分析,就很难确定市场渗透的根本原因以及打击这些假药的有效切入点。具有高样本量和随机抽样、包装检查和详细化学分析的研究对于正确识别(特别是专业)假冒样品是必要的。本综述中提出的分类系统不仅有助于计算假药的流行率,还有助于计算与不同类型假药相关的患者风险。

相似文献

1
Poor-Quality and Counterfeit Drugs: A Systematic Assessment of Prevalence and Risks Based on Data Published From 2007 to 2016.劣质和假冒药品:基于 2007 年至 2016 年发表的数据进行的流行率和风险的系统评估。
J Pharm Sci. 2017 Oct;106(10):2921-2929. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 23.
2
Update on counterfeit antibiotics worldwide; public health risks.全球假冒抗生素最新动态;公共卫生风险。
Med Mal Infect. 2012 Jun;42(6):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 22.
3
[Anti-counterfeit activities of pharmaceutical companies in Japan: for patient safety].[日本制药公司的防伪活动:为了患者安全]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2014;134(2):203-11. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.13-00230-2.
4
Forensic intelligence for medicine anti-counterfeiting.医学防伪的法医学情报。
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Mar;248:15-32. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
5
The Challenge of Counterfeit Drugs: A Comprehensive Review on Prevalence, Detection and Preventive Measures.假药的挑战:关于流行情况、检测及预防措施的全面综述
Curr Drug Saf. 2016;11(2):112-20. doi: 10.2174/1574886310666151014114633.
6
Substandard and counterfeit medicines: a systematic review of the literature.不合格药品和假药:文献系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 17;3(8):e002923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002923.
7
Drug Quality in South Africa: A Field Test.南非的药品质量:实地测试。
J Pharm Sci. 2018 Oct;107(10):2720-2730. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
8
A survey on illegal and counterfeit medicines for the treatment of erectile dysfunctions in Italy.意大利关于治疗勃起功能障碍的非法和假冒药品的调查。
J Sex Med. 2012 Aug;9(8):2130-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02770.x. Epub 2012 May 21.
9
Global scenario of counterfeit antimalarials: A potential threat.假冒抗疟药物的全球形势:潜在威胁。
J Vector Borne Dis. 2019 Oct-Dec;56(4):288-294. doi: 10.4103/0972-9062.302030.
10
The silent development of counterfeit medications in developing countries - A systematic review of detection technologies.发展中国家假药的悄然发展——检测技术的系统评价。
Int J Pharm. 2020 Sep 25;587:119702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119702. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving access to medicines to reduce marketing and use of substandard and falsified medicines in Africa: Scoping review.改善非洲药品可及性以减少不合格和伪造药品的销售与使用:范围综述
J Med Access. 2024 Mar 11;8:27550834241236598. doi: 10.1177/27550834241236598. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Health, Economic, and Social Impacts of Substandard and Falsified Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Methodological Approaches.中低收入国家劣药和假药的健康、经济和社会影响:方法学方法的系统评价。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Jun 20;109(2):228-240. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0525. Print 2023 Aug 2.
3
Contribution to the Detection of Poor Quality Sildenafil Drugs in Burkina Faso Using High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography.
利用高效薄层色谱法检测布基纳法索低质量西地那非药物的贡献
J Anal Methods Chem. 2021 Oct 13;2021:4093859. doi: 10.1155/2021/4093859. eCollection 2021.
4
A systematic review of substandard, falsified, unlicensed and unregistered medicine sampling studies: a focus on context, prevalence, and quality.劣药、假药、无许可证和未经注册药品抽样研究的系统评价:关注背景、流行程度和质量。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002393.
5
Quality Testing of Difficult-to-Make Prescription Pharmaceutical Products Marketed in the US.美国市场上难制备处方药产品的质量检测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2013920. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13920.
6
How Do We Combat Bogus Medicines in the Age of the COVID-19 Pandemic?在新冠疫情时代,我们如何打击假冒药品?
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1360-1363. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0903.
7
Importance of medicine quality in achieving universal health coverage.重视药品质量,实现全民健康覆盖。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0232966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232966. eCollection 2020.
8
The ghost in the data: Evidence gaps and the problem of fake drugs in global health research.数据中的幽灵:全球卫生研究中的证据空白和假药问题。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Aug;15(8):1103-1118. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1744678. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
9
Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations.巴基斯坦的监管框架:药品质量状况分析及未来建议
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019 Sep 11;12:23. doi: 10.1186/s40545-019-0184-z. eCollection 2019.
10
Evaluating the quality of antihypertensive drugs in Lagos State, Nigeria.评估尼日利亚拉各斯州的降压药质量。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211567. eCollection 2019.