Suppr超能文献

局限性成人尤文肉瘤:依托泊苷(VDC/IE)为基础的多模态治疗方案中的交替应用长春新碱、多柔比星、环磷酰胺和异环磷酰胺具有良好的疗效。

Localized Adult Ewing Sarcoma: Favorable Outcomes with Alternating Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Ifosfamide, Etoposide (VDC/IE)-Based Multimodality Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1265-1270. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0463. Epub 2017 May 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In children with localized Ewing sarcoma (ES), addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (VDC/IE) improved 5-year overall survival (OS) to 70%-80%. Prior to delivery of VDC/IE in adults, 5-year OS was <50%. We reviewed our institutional outcomes for adults with ES who received VDC/IE-based treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1997-2013, 67 adults with localized ES were treated with curative intent. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were determined using Kaplan-Meier method; comparisons were assessed with log-rank. Proportional hazard models were used to determine predictive factors.

RESULTS

All patients received VDC/IE (median 14 cycles.) Local therapy was surgery for 33, radiation therapy for 17, or both for 17. Median follow-up for living patients was 5.2 years. Six patients had disease progression on therapy. Site of first failure was local for three, local and distant for two, and distant for ten. Five-year LRFS was 91%; 5-year LRFS was 96% for nonpelvic disease and 64% for pelvic disease ( = .003). Five-year PFS was 66%, and 5-year OS was 79%. On multivariate analysis, pelvic site had a 3.3 times increased risk of progression ( = .01).

CONCLUSION

Survival for adults with localized ES treated with VDC/IE-based multimodality therapy appears to be better than historical data and similar to excellent outcomes in children. Pelvic site of disease remains a predictor of worse outcome. Given the paucity of literature for adult ES, these data help validate VDC/IE-based therapy as an appropriate treatment approach for this rare disease in adults.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is rare in adults. Treatment approaches for adults have been extrapolated from the pediatric experience, and there is a sense that adults fare less well than children. We reviewed treatment outcomes in adults with localized ES treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine in alternation with ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC/IE) as part of multimodality therapy. Survival outcomes appear to be better than historical data for adults and similar to the excellent outcomes for children. These data help validate VDC/IE-based therapy as an appropriate treatment approach for this rare disease in adults.

摘要

背景

在局部尤文肉瘤(ES)患儿中,在环磷酰胺、多柔比星和长春新碱(VDC/IE)中加入异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷可将 5 年总生存率(OS)提高至 70%-80%。在成人中应用 VDC/IE 前,5 年 OS <50%。我们回顾了本机构接受 VDC/IE 为基础治疗的成人 ES 患者的结局。

材料与方法

1997 年至 2013 年,67 例局部 ES 成人患者接受了根治性治疗。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算局部无复发生存率(LRFS)、无进展生存率(PFS)和 OS;采用对数秩检验进行比较。采用比例风险模型确定预测因素。

结果

所有患者均接受 VDC/IE 治疗(中位数 14 个周期)。33 例患者接受手术治疗,17 例患者接受放疗,17 例患者接受手术联合放疗。存活患者的中位随访时间为 5.2 年。6 例患者在治疗期间发生疾病进展。3 例患者的首发失败部位为局部,2 例患者的首发失败部位为局部和远处,10 例患者的首发失败部位为远处。5 年 LRFS 为 91%;非骨盆疾病的 5 年 LRFS 为 96%,而骨盆疾病的 5 年 LRFS 为 64%(=0.003)。5 年 PFS 为 66%,5 年 OS 为 79%。多因素分析显示,骨盆部位疾病进展的风险增加 3.3 倍(=0.01)。

结论

接受 VDC/IE 为基础的多模式治疗的局部尤文肉瘤成人患者的生存情况似乎优于历史数据,与儿童患者的优异结局相似。疾病的骨盆部位仍是预后不良的预测因素。鉴于成人尤文肉瘤文献较少,这些数据有助于验证 VDC/IE 为基础的治疗方案作为治疗成人罕见疾病的合适方法。

临床意义

尤文肉瘤(ES)在成人中罕见。成人的治疗方法是从儿科经验中推断出来的,而且有一种观点认为,成人的预后不如儿童。我们回顾了接受环磷酰胺、多柔比星和长春新碱交替应用异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷(VDC/IE)作为多模式治疗一部分的局部尤文肉瘤成人患者的治疗结局。生存结果似乎优于成人的历史数据,与儿童的优异结果相似。这些数据有助于验证 VDC/IE 为基础的治疗方案作为治疗成人罕见疾病的合适方法。

相似文献

2
Vincristine, Ifosfamide, and Doxorubicin for Initial Treatment of Ewing Sarcoma in Adults.
Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1271-1277. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0464. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
Outcomes of extraskeletal vs. skeletal Ewing sarcoma patients treated with standard chemotherapy protocol.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Jun;22(6):878-883. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02202-y. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
Adult Ewing sarcoma: survival and local control outcomes in 36 patients with metastatic disease.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;37(5):423-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31827de65e.

引用本文的文献

2
Identification of ENO-1 positive extracellular vesicles as a circulating biomarker for monitoring of Ewing sarcoma.
Cancer Sci. 2024 Nov;115(11):3660-3671. doi: 10.1111/cas.16343. Epub 2024 Sep 22.
3
Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of Ewing sarcoma (Spanish Sarcoma Research Group-GEIS).
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Mar;27(3):824-836. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03602-5. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
5
Non-chemotherapy adjuvant agents in TP53 mutant Ewing sarcoma.
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 1;13(1):14360. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40751-z.
6
Association of chemotherapy dose intensity and age with outcomes in patients with Ewing's family sarcoma.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb;21(1):87-94. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13998. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
7
Optimal Delivery of Follow-Up Care Following Treatment for Adults Treated for Ewing Sarcoma.
Cancer Manag Res. 2023 Jun 17;15:537-545. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S362693. eCollection 2023.
10
Bioinformatics Analysis of ZBTB16 as a Prognostic Marker for Ewing's Sarcoma.
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 6;2021:1989917. doi: 10.1155/2021/1989917. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Vincristine, Ifosfamide, and Doxorubicin for Initial Treatment of Ewing Sarcoma in Adults.
Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1271-1277. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0464. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
2
Ewing Sarcoma: Current Management and Future Approaches Through Collaboration.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 20;33(27):3036-46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.5256. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Adult ewing sarcoma: survival and local control outcomes in 102 patients with localized disease.
Sarcoma. 2013;2013:681425. doi: 10.1155/2013/681425. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
7
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with Ewing sarcoma over 40 years of age at diagnosis.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;37(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
9
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验