• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I期肾细胞癌部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术的治疗趋势、决定因素及生存率:来自国家癌症数据库的结果,2004 - 2013年

Treatment trends, determinants, and survival of partial and radical nephrectomy for stage I renal cell carcinoma: results from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2013.

作者信息

Plante Kyle, Stewart Telisa M, Wang Dongliang, Bratslavsky Gennady, Formica Margaret

机构信息

State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Aug;49(8):1375-1381. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1612-0. Epub 2017 May 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-017-1612-0
PMID:28550475
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide updated treatment trends, determinants, and survival of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) across the USA.

DATA SOURCES

Secondary data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) participant user file from 2004 to 2013. The NCDB captures approximately 70% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases each year.

STUDY DESIGN

Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for RN overall. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox regression, and log-rank test were used to characterize patient survival.

DATA COLLECTION

Patients diagnosed with clinical stage I RCC who received either RN or PN as the primary surgical treatment were included.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

The study consisted of 121,386 cases (PN = 57,016; RN = 64,370). The overall use of PN for stage I RCC increased by 24.2% over 9 years. An overall 5- and 10-year survival advantage was estimated following PN compared to RN; estimated overall risk of death was higher with RN.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PN for stage I RCC has continued to increase and is associated with an overall survival advantage. Multivariable analysis showed that disparities exist among sociodemographic groups that are also associated with treatment type and survival.

摘要

目的

提供美国各地部分肾切除术(PN)和根治性肾切除术(RN)的最新治疗趋势、决定因素和生存率。

数据来源

2004年至2013年国家癌症数据库(NCDB)参与者用户文件中的二手数据。NCDB每年收集约70%的新诊断癌症病例。

研究设计

采用多变量逻辑回归估计RN的总体优势比。采用Kaplan-Meier法、多变量Cox回归和对数秩检验来描述患者生存率。

数据收集

纳入诊断为临床I期肾细胞癌且接受RN或PN作为主要手术治疗的患者。

主要发现

该研究包括121386例病例(PN = 57016例;RN = 64370例)。9年间I期肾细胞癌PN的总体使用率增加了24.2%。与RN相比,PN术后估计有5年和10年的总体生存优势;RN的总体死亡风险估计更高。

结论

I期肾细胞癌PN的使用持续增加,且与总体生存优势相关。多变量分析表明,社会人口学群体之间存在差异,这些差异也与治疗类型和生存率相关。

相似文献

1
Treatment trends, determinants, and survival of partial and radical nephrectomy for stage I renal cell carcinoma: results from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2013.I期肾细胞癌部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术的治疗趋势、决定因素及生存率:来自国家癌症数据库的结果,2004 - 2013年
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Aug;49(8):1375-1381. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1612-0. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Partial nephrectomy is not associated with an overall survival advantage over radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage Ib-II renal masses: An analysis of the national cancer data base.部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术相比,在老年 Ib-II 期肾肿块患者中并不具有总体生存优势:国家癌症数据库分析。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;124(19):3839-3848. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31582. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Oncological outcomes of minimally invasive partial versus minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for cT1-2/N0/M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.cT1-2/N0/M0期透明细胞肾细胞癌行微创部分肾切除术与微创根治性肾切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):789-794. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1923-2. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
4
Comparison of survival for partial vs. radical nephrectomy in young patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma treated at commission on cancer-accredited facilities and influence of comorbidities on treatment choice.在癌症委员会认可的机构接受治疗的 T1a 期肾细胞癌年轻患者中,部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的生存率比较以及合并症对治疗选择的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Nov;35(11):660.e9-660.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.056. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Overall survival and development of stage IV chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing partial and radical nephrectomy for benign renal tumors.部分和根治性肾切除术治疗良性肾肿瘤患者的 IV 期慢性肾脏病的总生存和发展。
Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.12.023. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
6
Does the Unexpected Presence of Non-organ-confined Disease at Final Pathology Undermine Cancer Control in Patients with Clinical T1N0M0 Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Partial Nephrectomy?临床 T1N0M0 期肾细胞癌行部分肾切除术的患者,最终病理出现非器官局限性疾病是否会破坏其肿瘤控制?
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):972-977. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
Toward greater adoption of minimally invasive and nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal cell cancer in the United States.在美国,推动肾细胞癌微创和保留肾单位手术技术的更广泛应用。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Oct;34(10):433.e9-433.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach.美国 T1bN0M0 期肾细胞癌(RCC)采用部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术治疗后的生存:倾向评分法。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1457-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10597.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
9
A population-based comparison of cancer-control rates between radical and partial nephrectomy for T1A renal cell carcinoma.基于人群的 T1A 期肾细胞癌行根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术的肿瘤控制率比较。
Urology. 2010 Oct;76(4):883-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.028.
10
Cancer control of partial nephrectomy for high-risk localized renal cell carcinoma: population-based and single-institutional analysis.高危局限性肾细胞癌部分肾切除术的癌症控制:基于人群和单机构分析
World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1538-z. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalized survival predictions in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: development of a machine learning-based web tool.肾嫌色细胞癌的个性化生存预测:基于机器学习的网络工具的开发
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04718-5.
2
Surgical Trends and Complications in Partial and Radical Nephrectomy: Results from the GRAND Study.部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术的手术趋势及并发症:GRAND研究结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 24;16(1):97. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010097.
3
Factors Associated With Receipt of Partial Nephrectomy or Minimally Invasive Surgery for Patients With Clinical T1a and T1b Renal Masses: Implications for Regionalization of Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
2
Evaluation of national trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy in relation to the publication of the American Urologic Association guidelines for the management of clinical T1 renal masses.评估与美国泌尿外科学会临床T1期肾肿块管理指南发布相关的部分肾切除术使用的全国趋势。
BMC Urol. 2014 Dec 17;14:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-101.
3
Compared with radical nephrectomy, nephron-sparing surgery offers a long-term survival advantage in patients between the ages of 20 and 44 years with renal cell carcinomas (≤4 cm): an analysis of the SEER database.
与临床 T1a 和 T1b 肾脏肿块患者接受部分肾切除术或微创手术相关的因素:对医疗区域化的影响。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Dec;18(6):e643-e650. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
4
Survival benefit of nephron-sparing surgery for patients with pT1b renal cell carcinoma: A population-based study.保留肾单位手术对pT1b期肾细胞癌患者的生存获益:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncol Lett. 2020 Jan;19(1):498-504. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11065. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Is there a benefit to additional neuroaxial anesthesia in open nephrectomy? A prospective NSQIP propensity score analysis.开放性肾切除术中增加神经轴麻醉是否有益?一项前瞻性 NSQIP 倾向评分分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Sep;51(9):1481-1489. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02208-z. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
Treatment and Survival Disparities in the National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care Study (1987-2017).美国国立癌症研究所照护模式研究(1987 - 2017年)中的治疗与生存差异
Cancer Invest. 2018;36(6):319-329. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2018.1474894. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
与根治性肾切除术相比,保留肾单位手术为年龄在20至44岁之间、患有肾细胞癌(≤4厘米)的患者提供了长期生存优势:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jul;32(5):549-54. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
4
Comparing national cancer registries: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.国家癌症登记系统比较:国家癌症数据库(NCDB)与监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划。
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;109(7):629-30. doi: 10.1002/jso.23568. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
5
Trends in surgical management of T1 renal cell carcinoma.T1 期肾细胞癌的手术治疗趋势。
Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Feb;15(2):383. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0383-0.
6
The impact of comorbidity on cancer survival: a review.合并症对癌症生存的影响:综述
Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Nov 1;5(Suppl 1):3-29. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S47150.
7
Practice-setting and surgeon characteristics heavily influence the decision to perform partial nephrectomy among American Urologic Association surgeons.手术环境和外科医生的特征极大地影响了美国泌尿科协会外科医生施行部分肾切除术的决策。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):731-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11112.x. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
8
Treatment trends for stage I renal cell carcinoma.I 期肾细胞癌的治疗趋势。
J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.130. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
9
If a partial nephrectomy could be done safely for a renal tumor, would radical nephrectomy be considered malpractice?如果对于肾肿瘤能够安全地实施部分肾切除术,那么实施根治性肾切除术会被认定为医疗事故吗?
Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):465-6; discussion 466-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.040. Epub 2011 May 25.
10
A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma.一项前瞻性、随机、EORTC 多组间 3 期研究比较了选择性保留肾单位手术和根治性肾切除术治疗低分期肾细胞癌的肿瘤学结局。
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):543-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013. Epub 2010 Dec 22.