• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Acceptance of a pre-visit intervention to engage teens in pediatric asthma visits.接受预先访视干预以促使青少年参与儿科哮喘访视。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):2005-2011. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 5.
2
Acceptance of a Pre-visit Intervention to Engage African American Glaucoma Patients during Visits.接受预访干预,以在就诊期间让非裔美国青光眼患者参与进来。
Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Dec 1;99(12):838-843. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001959. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
3
A pre-visit video/question prompt list intervention to increase youth question-asking about attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during pediatric visits.一种就诊前视频/问题提示清单干预措施,以增加青少年在儿科就诊期间对注意力缺陷多动障碍提出问题的情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Oct;127:108320. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108320. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Improving youth question-asking and provider education during pediatric asthma visits.改善儿科哮喘就诊期间青少年的提问和医务人员教育。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):1051-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
The development of an educational video to motivate teens with asthma to be more involved during medical visits and to improve medication adherence.制作一部教育视频,以激励患有哮喘的青少年在就医过程中更多地参与,并提高药物依从性。
J Asthma. 2016 Sep;53(7):714-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1135945. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
The impact of a question prompt list and video intervention on teen asthma control and quality-of-life one year later: results of a randomized trial.问题提示清单和视频干预对青少年哮喘控制和一年后生活质量的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
J Asthma. 2020 Sep;57(9):1029-1038. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1633542. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
7
Questions and reported medication problems from pediatric patients and caregivers after intervention.干预后儿科患者和照护者提出的问题及报告的用药问题。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 21;76(6):366-373. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy057.
8
Provider-adolescent discussion and provider education about asthma triggers during pediatric visits: results of a randomized trial.提供者-青少年讨论和提供者教育关于哮喘触发因素在儿科就诊期间:一项随机试验的结果。
J Asthma. 2021 Dec;58(12):1565-1573. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1817936. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
9
Improving Black Patient Question-Asking and Provider Education During Glaucoma Visits.改善青光眼就诊期间黑人患者的提问和医生教育。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023 Mar-Apr;6(2):206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
10
Effect of an Asthma Question Prompt List and Video Intervention on Adolescents' Medication Adherence 12 Months Later.哮喘问题提示清单和视频干预对青少年 12 个月后药物依从性的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Jul;53(7):683-689. doi: 10.1177/1060028019831259. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Family-centred care interventions for children with chronic conditions: A scoping review.以家庭为中心的照护干预措施在儿童慢性病管理中的应用:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13897. doi: 10.1111/hex.13897.
2
Challenges and Opportunities in the Elective Management of Diverticulitis: Perspectives From a National Sample of Colorectal Surgeons.憩室炎择期治疗管理中的挑战与机遇:来自全国结直肠外科医师样本的观点。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Feb 1;67(2):264-272. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002941. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
3
Co-designing a website with and for youth, so they can better manage their health.与年轻人共同设计一个面向他们的网站,以便他们能更好地管理自己的健康。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 9;2:100164. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100164. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Trends in Adolescent Asthma Responsibility Over a 12-Month Study Period.青少年哮喘责任的趋势在 12 个月的研究期间。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Mar;70(3):478-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion.应用技术将预访规划付诸临床实践,以在大流行时代赋予以患者为中心的护理:系统评价和框架建议。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 13;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06456-7.
6
Improving Diabetes Management in Emerging Adulthood: An Intervention Development Study Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy.改善成年早期的糖尿病管理:一项采用多阶段优化策略的干预开发研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(10):e20191. doi: 10.2196/20191.
7
Provider-adolescent discussion and provider education about asthma triggers during pediatric visits: results of a randomized trial.提供者-青少年讨论和提供者教育关于哮喘触发因素在儿科就诊期间:一项随机试验的结果。
J Asthma. 2021 Dec;58(12):1565-1573. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1817936. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
8
Questions and reported medication problems from pediatric patients and caregivers after intervention.干预后儿科患者和照护者提出的问题及报告的用药问题。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 21;76(6):366-373. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy057.
9
Neurodevelopmental Risk: A Tool to Enhance Conversations With Families of Infants.神经发育风险:增进与婴儿家庭沟通的工具
J Child Neurol. 2019 Oct;34(11):653-659. doi: 10.1177/0883073819844927. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Do youth ask asthma providers the questions they want to ask?青少年是否会向哮喘病治疗人员提出他们想问的问题?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jul-Aug;7(6):2062-2064. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of an educational video to motivate teens with asthma to be more involved during medical visits and to improve medication adherence.制作一部教育视频,以激励患有哮喘的青少年在就医过程中更多地参与,并提高药物依从性。
J Asthma. 2016 Sep;53(7):714-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1135945. Epub 2016 May 4.
2
Child and caregiver reported problems in using asthma medications and question-asking during paediatric asthma visits.儿童和照顾者报告了在儿科哮喘就诊期间使用哮喘药物和提问方面存在的问题。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Feb;22(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12043. Epub 2013 May 29.
3
Communication during pediatric asthma visits and child asthma medication device technique 1 month later.小儿哮喘就诊期间的沟通情况以及1个月后儿童哮喘药物吸入装置使用技巧。
J Asthma. 2012 Nov;49(9):918-25. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.719250. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
4
Communication during pediatric asthma visits and self-reported asthma medication adherence.儿科哮喘就诊期间的沟通和自我报告的哮喘药物依从性。
Pediatrics. 2012 Oct;130(4):627-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0913. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
5
Development and piloting of a brain tumour-specific question prompt list.脑肿瘤特异性问题提示清单的制定和试点。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Jul;21(4):517-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01328.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
6
Addressing patients' information needs: a first evaluation of a question prompt sheet in the pretreatment consultation for patients with esophageal cancer.满足患者的信息需求:食管癌患者术前咨询中问题提示表的初步评估。
Dis Esophagus. 2012 Aug;25(6):512-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01274.x. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
7
Child and caregiver involvement and shared decision-making during asthma pediatric visits.儿童及照料者在小儿哮喘就诊过程中的参与及共同决策。
J Asthma. 2011 Dec;48(10):1022-31. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.626482. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
8
Provider Discussion, Education, and Question-Asking about Control Medications during Pediatric Asthma Visits.在儿科哮喘就诊期间,医护人员关于控制药物的讨论、教育及问题询问
Int J Pediatr. 2011;2011:212160. doi: 10.1155/2011/212160. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
9
Implementing patient question-prompt lists into routine cancer care.将患者问题清单纳入常规癌症护理。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):252-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
Vital signs: asthma prevalence, disease characteristics, and self-management education: United States, 2001--2009.生命体征:哮喘流行率、疾病特征和自我管理教育:美国,2001-2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 May 6;60(17):547-52.

接受预先访视干预以促使青少年参与儿科哮喘访视。

Acceptance of a pre-visit intervention to engage teens in pediatric asthma visits.

机构信息

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 7573, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7573, USA; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB # 7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, USA.

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 7573, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7573, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):2005-2011. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.013
PMID:28550963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5600669/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to: (a) describe teen feedback on an asthma question prompt list/video intervention designed to motivate teens to be more engaged during visits and (b) examine teen demographics associated with teen acceptance of the intervention.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-nine teens ages 11 to 17 with persistent asthma were enrolled into a randomized, controlled trial and assigned to either a standard care or an intervention group where they watched an educational video with their parents and received a prompt list to complete before visits. Teens were interviewed after visits.

RESULTS

Of the 185 teens randomized to the intervention group: 93% said teens should complete the prompt lists before visits; 95% recommended teens should watch the video before visits; teens with moderate/severe persistent asthma were significantly more likely to find the prompt list useful; non-White teens were significantly more likely to find the prompt list and video more useful.

CONCLUSIONS

Teens exposed to the question prompt list/video had very positive feedback about the intervention.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Providers/practices should consider having teens complete question prompt lists during pre-visit wait time for use during visits and watch the video with their parents before visits.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:(a)描述青少年对哮喘问题提示清单/视频干预措施的反馈,该措施旨在激励青少年在就诊期间更加积极参与;(b)探讨与青少年接受干预措施相关的人口统计学特征。

方法

将 259 名年龄在 11 至 17 岁之间、持续患有哮喘的青少年随机分为标准护理组或干预组,他们与父母一起观看教育视频,并在就诊前收到一份提示清单以完成。青少年在就诊后接受了访谈。

结果

在被随机分配到干预组的 185 名青少年中:93%的青少年表示在就诊前应该完成提示清单;95%的青少年建议在就诊前观看视频;中重度持续性哮喘的青少年认为提示清单非常有用;非白种人青少年认为提示清单和视频更有用。

结论

接受问题提示清单/视频干预的青少年对干预措施给予了非常积极的反馈。

实践意义

提供者/实践应该考虑让青少年在就诊前的等待时间内完成问题提示清单,以便在就诊期间使用,并与父母一起观看视频。