Suppr超能文献

干预后儿科患者和照护者提出的问题及报告的用药问题。

Questions and reported medication problems from pediatric patients and caregivers after intervention.

机构信息

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 21;76(6):366-373. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy057.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of an asthma question prompt list with video intervention to increase question-asking during pediatric office visits among youth who reported medication problems was evaluated.

METHODS

English- or Spanish-speaking youth age 11-17 years with persistent asthma and their caregivers were enrolled from 4 pediatric clinics in a randomized controlled trial. Youth were randomized to intervention or usual care groups. Youth in the intervention group watched an educational video with their caregivers on an iPad. The youth then received a 1-page asthma question prompt list to complete before their visits. The audio of all baseline medical visits was recorded. Youth were interviewed and caregivers completed questionnaires at baseline and 6 months later.

RESULTS

A total of 40 providers and 359 of their patients participated. Youth who reported at least 1 medication problem who were in the intervention group were significantly more likely to ask 1 or more questions about medications during their visits than youth in the usual care group (odds ratio = 3.1, 95% confidence interval = 2.0, 4.1). Seventy-four percent of youth and 71% caregivers who reported the youth had problems using asthma medications at baseline still reported 1 or more problems 6 months later.

CONCLUSION

Among youth who reported 1 or more problems with using their asthma medications, the intervention significantly increased youth question-asking. Many youth- and caregiver-reported problems with using asthma medications persisted over time.

摘要

目的

评估哮喘问题提示清单与视频干预相结合对增加报告用药问题的青少年在儿科就诊期间提问效果。

方法

从 4 家儿科诊所招募了英语或西班牙语的 11-17 岁持续性哮喘青少年及其照顾者,他们被随机分为干预组或常规护理组。干预组的青少年与照顾者一起在 iPad 上观看教育视频。然后,青少年会收到一张 1 页的哮喘问题提示清单,以便在就诊前完成。所有基线医疗访问的音频都被记录下来。青少年在基线和 6 个月后接受访谈,照顾者填写问卷。

结果

共有 40 名提供者和 359 名患者参与。在报告至少 1 种用药问题的青少年中,干预组在就诊期间询问 1 种或多种药物相关问题的可能性显著高于常规护理组(比值比=3.1,95%置信区间=2.0,4.1)。74%的青少年和 71%报告青少年在使用哮喘药物方面存在问题的照顾者在基线时仍报告了 1 种或多种问题,6 个月后仍存在这些问题。

结论

在报告使用哮喘药物存在 1 种或多种问题的青少年中,干预措施显著增加了青少年的提问。许多青少年和照顾者报告在使用哮喘药物方面存在问题,并且这些问题随着时间的推移而持续存在。

相似文献

1
Questions and reported medication problems from pediatric patients and caregivers after intervention.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 21;76(6):366-373. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy057.
2
Improving youth question-asking and provider education during pediatric asthma visits.
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):1051-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Effect of an Asthma Question Prompt List and Video Intervention on Adolescents' Medication Adherence 12 Months Later.
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Jul;53(7):683-689. doi: 10.1177/1060028019831259. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Provider use of a participatory decision-making style with youth and caregivers and satisfaction with pediatric asthma visits.
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018 May 10;9:147-154. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S152068. eCollection 2018.
6
Provider-adolescent discussion and provider education about asthma triggers during pediatric visits: results of a randomized trial.
J Asthma. 2021 Dec;58(12):1565-1573. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1817936. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Child and caregiver reported problems in using asthma medications and question-asking during paediatric asthma visits.
Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Feb;22(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12043. Epub 2013 May 29.
9
Factors associated with adolescent and caregiver reported problems in using asthma medications.
J Asthma. 2019 Apr;56(4):451-457. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1466312. Epub 2018 May 21.
10
Communication during pediatric asthma visits and self-reported asthma medication adherence.
Pediatrics. 2012 Oct;130(4):627-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0913. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Family-centred care interventions for children with chronic conditions: A scoping review.
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13897. doi: 10.1111/hex.13897.
2
Disseminating a health information website to teens using a three-pronged approach with social media outreach.
PEC Innov. 2024 May 6;4:100288. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100288. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving youth question-asking and provider education during pediatric asthma visits.
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):1051-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Acceptance of a pre-visit intervention to engage teens in pediatric asthma visits.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):2005-2011. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 5.
4
Patients With Limited Health Literacy Ask Fewer Questions During Office Visits With Hand Surgeons.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1291-1297. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5140-5. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
6
Impact of student pharmacist-delivered asthma education on child and caregiver knowledge.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):188. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810188.
7
Effect of a pharmacist intervention on asthma control. A cluster randomised trial.
Respir Med. 2013 Sep;107(9):1346-55. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
8
Child and caregiver reported problems in using asthma medications and question-asking during paediatric asthma visits.
Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Feb;22(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12043. Epub 2013 May 29.
9
Communication during pediatric asthma visits and self-reported asthma medication adherence.
Pediatrics. 2012 Oct;130(4):627-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0913. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
10
Influence of race and socioeconomic status on engagement in pediatric primary care.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jun;87(3):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验