Beshears John, Choi James J, Laibson David, Madrian Brigitte C
Harvard University and NBER.
Yale University and NBER.
Rev Financ Stud. 2017 Jun;30(6):1971-2005. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhw086. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
Many experiments have found that participants take more investment risk if they see returns less frequently, see portfolio-level returns (rather than each individual asset's returns), or see long-horizon (rather than one-year) historical return distributions. In contrast, we find that such information aggregation treatments do not affect total equity investment when we make the investment environment more realistic than in prior experiments. Previously documented aggregation effects are not robust to changes in the risky asset's return distribution or the introduction of a multi-day delay between portfolio choice and return realizations.
许多实验发现,如果参与者较少频繁地看到回报、看到投资组合层面的回报(而非每项个别资产的回报),或者看到长期(而非一年期)历史回报分布,他们就会承担更多投资风险。相比之下,我们发现,当我们使投资环境比之前的实验更贴近现实时,此类信息汇总处理并不会影响股票投资总额。先前记录的汇总效应对于风险资产回报分布的变化或在投资组合选择与回报实现之间引入多日延迟并不具有稳健性。