Kuoch Kenley L J, Meyer Denny, Austin David W, Knowles Simon R
Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Statistics, Data Science and Epidemiology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Jul;98:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 20.
Paruresis refers to the inability to initiate or sustain urination where individuals are present due to the fear of perceived scrutiny from others. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate four key questions: (1) What is the prevalence of paruresis and its associated demographic features; (2) What is the prevalence of psychopathology in paruresis cohorts, how does it compare to other chronic-health conditions, and what percentage of paruresis patients also have social anxiety disorder? (3) How does quality of life, and levels of anxiety and depression compare between those with and without paruresis; and (4) do psychological interventions for paruresis patients reduce paruresis symptoms, or, anxiety, or depression, or improve quality of life?
A review was conducted using PRISMA protocol for search strategy, selection criteria, and data extraction. Searched databases included PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO. Over the 1418 studies screened, ten were found relating to at least one review question.
The prevalence of paruresis ranged between 2.8 and 16.4%, and around 5.1-22.2% of individuals with paruresis also had Social Anxiety Disorder. Paruresis symptoms were shown to reduce in one intervention study. Paruresis was also associated with poorer quality of life. A key limitation of the research to date has been the notable methodological problems and lack of standardisation relating to the measurement of paruresis.
Little is known about the prevalence of paruresis and more rigorous studies of paruresis are required. Recommendations in terms of clinical implications, diagnostic criteria and future research relating to paruresis are discussed.
境遇性排尿困难是指由于担心被他人审视而无法开始或维持排尿。本系统评价的目的是评估四个关键问题:(1)境遇性排尿困难的患病率及其相关人口统计学特征;(2)境遇性排尿困难队列中心理病理学的患病率如何,与其他慢性健康状况相比如何,以及境遇性排尿困难患者中同时患有社交焦虑障碍的比例是多少?(3)有和没有境遇性排尿困难的人群在生活质量、焦虑和抑郁水平上有何比较?(4)针对境遇性排尿困难患者的心理干预是否能减轻境遇性排尿困难症状、焦虑或抑郁,或改善生活质量?
使用PRISMA方案进行综述,包括搜索策略、选择标准和数据提取。搜索的数据库包括PubMed、CINAHL和PsychINFO。在筛选的1418项研究中,发现有10项与至少一个综述问题相关。
境遇性排尿困难的患病率在2.8%至16.4%之间,约5.1%-22.2%的境遇性排尿困难个体也患有社交焦虑障碍。一项干预研究显示境遇性排尿困难症状有所减轻。境遇性排尿困难还与较差的生活质量相关。迄今为止,该研究的一个关键局限性是在境遇性排尿困难测量方面存在显著的方法学问题和缺乏标准化。
关于境遇性排尿困难的患病率知之甚少,需要对境遇性排尿困难进行更严格的研究。讨论了有关境遇性排尿困难的临床意义、诊断标准和未来研究的建议。