Taylor Lauren J, Rathouz Paul J, Berlin Ana, Brasel Karen J, Mosenthal Anne C, Finlayson Emily, Cooper Zara, Steffens Nicole M, Jacobson Nora, Buffington Anne, Tucholka Jennifer L, Zhao Qianqian, Schwarze Margaret L
Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e014002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014002.
Older patients frequently undergo operations that carry high risk for postoperative complications and death. Poor preoperative communication between patients and surgeons can lead to uninformed decisions and result in unexpected outcomes, conflict between surgeons and patients, and treatment inconsistent with patient preferences. This article describes the protocol for a multisite, cluster-randomised trial that uses a stepped wedge design to test a patient-driven question prompt list (QPL) intervention aimed to improve preoperative decision making and inform postoperative expectations.
This Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded trial will be conducted at five academic medical centres in the USA. Study participants include surgeons who routinely perform vascular or oncological surgery, their patients and families. We aim to enrol 40 surgeons and 480 patients over 24 months. Patients age 65 or older who see a study-enrolled surgeon to discuss a vascular or oncological problem that could be treated with high-risk surgery will be enrolled at their clinic visit. Together with stakeholders, we developed a QPL intervention addressing preoperative communication needs of patients considering major surgery. Guided by the theories of self-determination and relational autonomy, this intervention is designed to increase patient activation. Patients will receive the QPL brochure and a letter from their surgeon encouraging its use. Using audio recordings of the outpatient surgical consultation, patient and family member questionnaires administered at three time points and retrospective chart review, we will compare the effectiveness of the QPL intervention to usual care with respect to the following primary outcomes: patient engagement in decision making, psychological well-being and post-treatment regret for patients and families, and interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict relating to treatment decisions and treatments received.
Approvals have been granted by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin and at each participating site, and a Certificate of Confidentiality has been obtained. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national meetings.
NCT02623335.
老年患者经常接受术后并发症和死亡风险较高的手术。患者与外科医生术前沟通不畅可能导致决策失误,进而引发意外后果、医患冲突以及不符合患者偏好的治疗。本文介绍了一项多中心、整群随机试验的方案,该试验采用阶梯楔形设计,旨在测试一种以患者为导向的问题提示清单(QPL)干预措施,以改善术前决策并使术后期望更加明确。
这项由患者为中心的结果研究机构资助的试验将在美国的五个学术医疗中心进行。研究参与者包括经常进行血管或肿瘤手术的外科医生及其患者和家属。我们的目标是在24个月内招募40名外科医生和480名患者。65岁及以上的患者,若就诊于参与研究的外科医生处,讨论可能通过高风险手术治疗的血管或肿瘤问题,将在其门诊就诊时被纳入研究。我们与利益相关者共同制定了一项QPL干预措施,以满足考虑进行大手术的患者的术前沟通需求。在自我决定和关系自主性理论的指导下,该干预措施旨在提高患者的积极性。患者将收到QPL手册以及外科医生鼓励使用该手册的信件。通过门诊手术咨询的录音、在三个时间点发放给患者和家属的问卷以及回顾性病历审查,我们将比较QPL干预措施与常规护理在以下主要结局方面的有效性:患者参与决策的程度、患者及其家属的心理健康和治疗后遗憾,以及与治疗决策和接受的治疗相关的人际和个人内部冲突。
威斯康星大学及各参与站点的机构审查委员会已批准该研究,并已获得保密证书。研究结果将在同行评审的出版物上发表,并在全国性会议上展示。
NCT02623335。