• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Frequency of Preoperative Advance Care Planning for Older Adults Undergoing High-risk Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.高龄高危手术患者术前预先医疗照护计划的实施频率:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):e211521. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1521. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
2
Effectiveness of a Question Prompt List Intervention for Older Patients Considering Major Surgery: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial.针对考虑接受重大手术的老年患者的问题提示清单干预措施的有效性:一项多中心随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):6-13. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3778.
3
Surgeon Use of Shared Decision-making for Older Adults Considering Major Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.外科医生对考虑接受重大手术的老年人使用共享决策:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2022 May 1;157(5):406-413. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0290.
4
Navigating high-risk surgery: protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions.应对高风险手术:一项多中心、阶梯式楔形、整群随机试验的方案,该试验采用问题提示列表干预措施,以促使老年人提出有助于治疗决策的问题。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e014002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014002.
5
Preoperative Advance Care Planning for Older Adults Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery.老年人接受大腹部手术的术前预先医疗照护计划。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Apr;39(4):406-412. doi: 10.1177/10499091211020276. Epub 2021 May 28.
6
Empowering Older Adults to Discuss Advance Care Planning During Clinical Visits: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.赋权老年人在临床就诊期间讨论预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16405. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
Missed Opportunities and Health Disparities for Advance Care Planning Before Elective Surgery in Older Adults.老年人择期手术前的预先医疗照护计划错失机会与健康差异。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):e223687. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3687. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
8
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
9
Association of an Advance Care Planning Video and Communication Intervention With Documentation of Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.一项关于预立医疗照护计划视频和沟通干预措施与老年患者预立医疗照护计划记录之间关联的非随机对照试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220354. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0354.
10
Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Multidisciplinary Intervention vs Usual Care on Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adults in an Accountable Care Organization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.护士主导的多学科干预与常规护理对问责制医疗组织中脆弱老年人的预先护理计划的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):361-369. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5950.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance care planning in the perioperative setting: a mixed methods study of anaesthetists' knowledge, attitudes and practice.围手术期的预先护理计划:一项关于麻醉医生的知识、态度和实践的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 28;15(8):e101642. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101642.
2
Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Trauma and Intensive Care (ERATIC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and International Association for Trauma Surgery and Intensive Care (IATSIC) Society Recommendations: Part 3: Trauma Ethics and Systems Aspects.创伤与重症监护强化康复指南(ERATIC):外科手术强化康复(ERAS)与国际创伤外科与重症监护协会(IATSIC)学会建议:第3部分:创伤伦理与系统方面
World J Surg. 2025 Aug;49(8):2055-2065. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70003. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
3
Palliative prognostic tools in surgical patients at the end of life: a systematic review.终末期手术患者的姑息性预后工具:一项系统综述
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;134(6):1648-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.03.008. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
4
Patient-Reported Goals of Care in the Preoperative Clinic: Barriers to and Facilitators of Patient Values Elicitation and Documentation.术前门诊患者报告的护理目标:患者价值观引出与记录的障碍和促进因素
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;131(4):607-613. doi: 10.1002/jso.27974. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
5
Explainable Machine Learning Model to Preoperatively Predict Postoperative Complications in Inpatients With Cancer Undergoing Major Operations.可解释机器学习模型用于预测接受重大手术的癌症住院患者术后并发症。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Apr;8:e2300247. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00247.
6
Development and perception of surgery-specific goals of care discussions in the preoperative setting: A learning pilot.术前手术相关照护目标讨论的制定和感知:一项学习性试点研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;129(7):1384-1389. doi: 10.1002/jso.27632. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
7
"It Gives Me Peace of Mind So I Can Focus on Healing": Views on Advance Care Planning for Older Surgical Patients.“这让我安心,所以我能专注于康复”:老年外科患者的预先护理计划观
J Palliat Med. 2024 May;27(5):667-674. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0589. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
8
Disparities in Preoperative Goals of Care Documentation in Veterans. Veterans 术前照护目标记录中的差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48235.
9
Early Integrated Palliative Care Within a Surgical Oncology Clinic.早期综合姑息治疗纳入外科肿瘤诊所。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.41928.
10
Clinician Review of Advanced Care Planning for Older Surgical Patients Requiring Intensive Care.老年外科重症患者高级护理计划的临床医生回顾
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Feb;50(2):154-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.09.008. Epub 2023 Oct 11.

高龄高危手术患者术前预先医疗照护计划的实施频率:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。

Frequency of Preoperative Advance Care Planning for Older Adults Undergoing High-risk Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Department of Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):e211521. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1521. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1521
PMID:33978693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8117055/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

For patients facing major surgery, surgeons believe preoperative advance care planning (ACP) is valuable and routinely performed. How often preoperative ACP occurs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the frequency of preoperative ACP discussion and documentation for older adults undergoing major surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis of data from a multisite randomized clinical trial testing the effects of a question prompt list intervention on preoperative communication for older adults considering major surgery was performed at 5 US academic medical centers. Participants included surgeons who routinely perform high-risk surgery and patients 60 years or older with at least 1 comorbidity and an oncological or vascular (cardiac, peripheral, or neurovascular) problem. Data were collected from June 1, 2016, to November 30, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received a question prompt list brochure with 11 questions that they might ask their surgeon.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

For patients who had major surgery, any statement related to ACP from the surgeon, patient, or family member during the audiorecorded preoperative consultation was counted. The presence of a written advance directive (AD) in the medical record at the time of the initial consultation or added preoperatively was recorded. Open-ended interviews with patients who experienced postoperative complications and family members were conducted.

RESULTS

Among preoperative consultations with 213 patients (122 men [57%]; mean [SD] age, 72 [7] years), only 13 conversations had any discussion of ACP. In this cohort of older patients with at least 1 comorbid condition, 141 (66%) did not have an AD on file before major surgery; there was no significant association between the presence of an AD and patient age (60-69 years, 26 [31%]; 70-79 years, 31 [33%]; ≥80 years, 15 [42%]; P = .55), number of comorbidities (1, 35 [32%]; 2, 18 [33%]; ≥3, 19 [40%]; P = .62), or type of procedure (oncological, 53 [32%]; vascular, 19 [42%]; P = .22). There was no difference in preoperative communication about ACP or documentation of an AD for patients who were mailed a question prompt list brochure (intervention, 38 [35%]; usual care, 34 [33%]; P = .77). Patients with complications were enthusiastic about ACP but did not think it was important to discuss their preferences for life-sustaining treatments with their surgeon preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although surgeons believe that preoperative discussion of patient preferences for postoperative life-sustaining treatments is important, these preferences are infrequently explored, addressed, or documented preoperatively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02623335.

摘要

重要性

对于面临重大手术的患者,外科医生认为术前预先护理计划(ACP)是有价值的,并且通常会进行。目前尚不清楚术前 ACP 发生的频率。

目的

量化老年患者接受重大手术后进行术前 ACP 讨论和记录的频率。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国 5 家学术医疗中心进行的多地点随机临床试验的二次分析,该试验测试了问题提示清单干预对考虑接受重大手术的老年患者术前沟通的影响。参与者包括经常进行高风险手术的外科医生和至少有 1 种合并症且有肿瘤或血管(心脏、外周或神经血管)问题的 60 岁或以上的患者。数据于 2016 年 6 月 1 日至 2018 年 11 月 30 日收集。

干预措施

患者收到了一份问题提示清单小册子,其中包含 11 个他们可能会向外科医生提出的问题。

主要结果和测量指标

对于接受重大手术的患者,在录音术前咨询期间,外科医生、患者或家属与 ACP 相关的任何陈述都被记录下来。在最初咨询时或术前记录了医疗记录中预先存在的书面预先指示(AD)。对经历术后并发症的患者和家属进行了开放式访谈。

结果

在对 213 名患者(122 名男性[57%];平均[标准差]年龄,72[7]岁)的术前咨询中,只有 13 次对话讨论了 ACP。在这组患有至少 1 种合并症的老年患者中,141 名(66%)在接受重大手术前没有存档的 AD;AD 的存在与患者年龄之间没有显著关联(60-69 岁,26[31%];70-79 岁,31[33%];≥80 岁,15[42%];P=0.55),与合并症数量(1,35[32%];2,18[33%];≥3,19[40%];P=0.62)或手术类型(肿瘤学,53[32%];血管,19[42%];P=0.22)无关。对于接受邮寄问题提示清单小册子的患者,术前关于 ACP 的沟通或 AD 的记录没有差异(干预组,38[35%];常规护理组,34[33%];P=0.77)。有并发症的患者对 ACP 很感兴趣,但他们认为在术前与外科医生讨论维持生命治疗的偏好并不重要。

结论和相关性

尽管外科医生认为术前讨论患者对术后维持生命治疗的偏好很重要,但这些偏好很少被探讨、解决或记录在术前。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02623335。