Grassetti Andrew V, Hards Rufus, Gerber Scott A
Departments of Molecular & Systems Biology, and Biochemistry & Cell Biology, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Norris Cotton Cancer Center, One Medical Center Drive HB-7937, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Jul;409(19):4615-4625. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0407-6. Epub 2017 May 29.
Technological advances in liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) have enabled comprehensive analyses of proteins and their post-translational modifications from cell culture and tissue samples. However, sample complexity necessitates offline prefractionation via a chromatographic method that is orthogonal to online reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). This additional fractionation step improves target identification rates by reducing the complexity of the sample as it is introduced to the instrument. A commonly employed offline prefractionation method is high pH reversed-phase (Hi-pH RP) chromatography. Though highly orthogonal to online RP-HPLC, Hi-pH RP relies on buffers that interfere with electrospray ionization. Thus, samples that are prefractionated using Hi-pH RP are typically desalted prior to LC-MS/MS. In the present work, we evaluate an alternative offline prefractionation method, pentafluorophenyl (PFP)-based reversed-phase chromatography. Importantly, PFP prefractionation results in samples that are dried prior to analysis by LC-MS/MS. This reduction in sample handling relative to Hi-pH RP results in time savings and could facilitate higher target identification rates. Here, we have compared the performances of PFP and Hi-pH RP in offline prefractionation of peptides and phosphopeptides that have been isolated from human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells. Given the prevalence of isobaric mass tags for peptide quantification, we evaluated PFP chromatography of peptides labeled with tandem mass tags. Our results suggest that PFP is a viable alternative to Hi-pH RP for both peptide and phosphopeptide offline prefractionation.
液相色谱和串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)技术的进步使得能够对细胞培养物和组织样品中的蛋白质及其翻译后修饰进行全面分析。然而,样品的复杂性使得有必要通过一种与在线反相高效液相色谱(RP-HPLC)正交的色谱方法进行离线预分级分离。这一额外的分级分离步骤通过降低引入仪器时样品的复杂性来提高目标物的鉴定率。一种常用的离线预分级分离方法是高pH反相(Hi-pH RP)色谱法。尽管Hi-pH RP与在线RP-HPLC高度正交,但它依赖于会干扰电喷雾电离的缓冲液。因此,使用Hi-pH RP进行预分级分离的样品通常在LC-MS/MS分析之前进行脱盐处理。在本研究中,我们评估了另一种离线预分级分离方法,即基于五氟苯基(PFP)的反相色谱法。重要的是,PFP预分级分离得到的样品在通过LC-MS/MS分析之前是干燥的。相对于Hi-pH RP,样品处理的这种减少节省了时间,并可能有助于提高目标物的鉴定率。在这里,我们比较了PFP和Hi-pH RP在从人宫颈癌(HeLa)细胞中分离的肽段和磷酸肽段的离线预分级分离中的性能。鉴于用于肽段定量的等压质量标签的普遍性,我们评估了用串联质量标签标记的肽段的PFP色谱法。我们的结果表明,对于肽段和磷酸肽段的离线预分级分离,PFP是Hi-pH RP的一种可行替代方法。