Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Dec;73(12):2817-2831. doi: 10.1111/jan.13351. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
This systematic quantitative review identifies and summarizes the current knowledge and effects of training interventions for managing patients' challenging behaviour.
Challenging behaviour is an acknowledged worldwide healthcare problem and its management can have a huge impact on quality of care. Evidence-based training interventions that focus on managing challenging behaviour are needed, but few tools for the systematic evaluation of these interventions are currently offered.
A quantitative systematic review following the 2008 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines.
CINAHL, Scopus, PsycInfo, PubMed and Cochrane were searched using the same terms for papers published in English from 2005-2015.
Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias, according to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group criteria. A narrative summary was conducted.
We included 17 studies and evaluated 16 training interventions. Interventions were classified into four key themes: disengagements, communication, controlling behavioural symptoms and restrictive measures. Our review showed that interventions were more likely to decrease violent incident rates and increase staff confidence than change staff attitudes or increase knowledge. The elements of competence used to manage challenging behaviour were measured unilaterally. The evidence provided by studies was largely weak.
The variety of measurements used in the studies made comparing the effectiveness of the training interventions difficult. An individual's competence to manage challenging behaviour needs to be defined and a comprehensive scale for evaluating competence is also needed. Patient safety should be included in future evaluations.
本系统定量综述旨在识别和总结目前管理患者挑战性行为的培训干预措施的知识和效果。
挑战性行为是一个被广泛认可的全球医疗保健问题,其管理对护理质量有重大影响。需要有针对挑战性行为管理的循证培训干预措施,但目前很少有工具可以对这些干预措施进行系统评估。
遵循 2008 年 Cochrane 中心的评价和传播指南进行的定量系统评价。
使用相同的术语在 2005 年至 2015 年期间,对 CINAHL、Scopus、PsycInfo、PubMed 和 Cochrane 中的英文文献进行了检索。
根据 Cochrane 有效实践和组织护理组的标准,对研究进行质量和偏倚风险评估。进行了叙述性总结。
我们纳入了 17 项研究并评价了 16 项培训干预措施。干预措施分为四个关键主题:解除、沟通、控制行为症状和限制措施。我们的综述表明,干预措施更有可能降低暴力事件发生率,增强员工信心,而不是改变员工态度或增加知识。用于管理挑战性行为的能力要素是单方面衡量的。研究提供的证据在很大程度上是薄弱的。
研究中使用的各种测量方法使得比较培训干预措施的有效性变得困难。需要定义个体管理挑战性行为的能力,并需要一个全面的评估能力的量表。未来的评估应该包括患者安全。