• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying "Hitting Bottom" Among Individuals with Alcohol Problems: Development and Evaluation of the Noteworthy Aspects of Drinking Important to Recovery (NADIR).识别有酒精问题个体的“谷底”:值得注意的恢复相关饮酒方面(NADIR)的发展和评估。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Oct 15;52(12):1602-1615. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1293104. Epub 2017 May 30.
2
Hangover in Post-College-Aged Drinkers: Psychometric Properties of the Hangover Symptom Scale (HSS) and the Hangover Symptom Scale-Short Form (HSS-5).宿醉在刚毕业的大学生群体中的表现:宿醉症状量表(HSS)和宿醉症状量表-短式版(HSS-5)的心理计量学特性。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jun;42(6):1122-1131. doi: 10.1111/acer.13634. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Development and psychometric analysis of the Brief DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnostic Assessment: Towards effective diagnosis in college students.DSM-5 酒精使用障碍诊断评估简表的编制与心理测量学分析:为大学生的有效诊断。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Nov;31(7):797-806. doi: 10.1037/adb0000320.
4
Concurrent use of alcohol with other drugs and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder comorbid with other drug use disorders: Sociodemographic characteristics, severity, and psychopathology.同时使用酒精与其他药物以及 DSM-5 酒精使用障碍与其他药物使用障碍共病:社会人口统计学特征、严重程度和精神病理学。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jun 1;187:261-269. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Revisiting the Drinker Inventory of Consequences: An extensive evaluation of psychometric properties in two alcohol clinical trials.重新审视《饮酒者后果问卷》:在两项酒精临床研究中对心理测量特性的广泛评估。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Feb;32(1):52-63. doi: 10.1037/adb0000344.
6
Defining Recovery From Alcohol Use Disorder: Development of an NIAAA Research Definition.定义酒精使用障碍的康复:NIAAA 研究定义的发展。
Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 1;179(11):807-813. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21090963. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
7
The harmful dysfunction model of alcohol use disorder: revised criteria to improve the validity of diagnosis and prevalence estimates.酒精使用障碍的有害功能障碍模型:修订标准以提高诊断的有效性和患病率估计值。
Addiction. 2015 Jun;110(6):931-42. doi: 10.1111/add.12859. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
8
Reliability and validity of the Brief DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnostic Assessment: A systematic replication in a crowdsourced sample.DSM-5 酒精使用障碍诊断评估简表的信度和效度:在众包样本中的系统复制。
Addict Behav. 2019 May;92:194-198. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
9
Subthreshold problem drinkers in DSM-5 alcohol use disorder classification.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版酒精使用障碍分类中的阈下问题饮酒者
Am J Addict. 2016 Aug;25(5):408-15. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12404. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Reward and relief dimensions of temptation to drink: construct validity and role in predicting differential benefit from acamprosate and naltrexone.奖赏和缓解维度的饮酒诱惑:结构有效性及其在预测坎格雷酸酯和纳曲酮不同获益中的作用。
Addict Biol. 2017 Nov;22(6):1528-1539. doi: 10.1111/adb.12427. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the reasons for quitting and/or reducing alcohol among those who have received alcohol use disorder treatment.对接受酒精使用障碍治疗的人群中戒酒和/或减少饮酒原因的系统评价。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Nov 19;13:100300. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100300. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
'Ageing with an alcohol problem is not what I envision': reclaiming agency in shaping personal ageing trajectory and recovery from alcohol problems.“带着酒精问题老去不是我所设想的”:在塑造个人衰老轨迹和从酒精问题中恢复的过程中重新获得代理权。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 16;23(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04573-y.
3
'Why would we not want to keep everybody safe?' The views of family members of people who use drugs on the implementation of drug consumption rooms in Scotland.为什么我们不想让每个人都安全呢?苏格兰吸毒者家属对吸毒室实施的看法。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Aug 29;19(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00679-5.
4
Recovery from alcohol among urban Alaska Native and American Indian people.城市中阿拉斯加原住民和美洲印第安人中的酒精戒断恢复。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2023 Jan-Mar;22(1):154-170. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2021.1918599. Epub 2021 May 25.
5
Profiles of recovery from alcohol use disorder at three years following treatment: can the definition of recovery be extended to include high functioning heavy drinkers?治疗后 3 年酒精使用障碍康复情况分析:能否将康复定义扩展到包括高功能重度饮酒者?
Addiction. 2019 Jan;114(1):69-80. doi: 10.1111/add.14403. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Validation of Reduced Alcohol Consumption After Treatment for Alcohol Dependence Using the World Health Organization Risk Drinking Levels.使用世界卫生组织风险饮酒水平对酒精依赖治疗后减少酒精消费进行临床验证。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jan;41(1):179-186. doi: 10.1111/acer.13272. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
2
Five Facets of Mindfulness and Psychological Health: Evaluating a Psychological Model of the Mechanisms of Mindfulness.正念与心理健康的五个方面:评估正念机制的心理学模型
Mindfulness (N Y). 2015 Oct 1;6(5):1021-1032. doi: 10.1007/s12671-014-0349-4. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
4
Treatment of Alcohol Addiction.酒精成瘾的治疗
Br Med J. 1965 Jul 24;2(5455):184-5.
5
Editorial: an author's checklist for measure development and validation manuscripts.社论:作者关于测量工具开发与验证稿件的核对清单
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Aug;34(7):691-6. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp046. Epub 2009 May 31.
6
Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial.酒精依赖的联合药物治疗与行为干预:综合疗法研究:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2006 May 3;295(17):2003-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.17.2003.
7
Beliefs about drinking problems: results from a general population telephone survey.关于饮酒问题的看法:一项普通人群电话调查的结果
Addict Behav. 2007 Jan;32(1):166-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
8
Does stage-of-change predict dropout in a culturally diverse sample of adolescents admitted to inpatient substance-abuse treatment? A test of the Transtheoretical Model.行为改变阶段能否预测接受住院药物滥用治疗的文化多元化青少年样本中的退出情况?对跨理论模型的一项检验。
Addict Behav. 2005 Oct;30(9):1834-47. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.07.015. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
9
Current heavy drinkers' reasons for considering change: results from a natural history general population survey.当前重度饮酒者考虑改变的原因:一项自然史一般人群调查的结果。
Addict Behav. 2005 Mar;30(3):581-4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.05.028.
10
Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes.使酒精成瘾治疗方法与个体差异相匹配:匹配项目(Project MATCH)的三年饮酒结果。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Sep;22(6):1300-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03912.x.

识别有酒精问题个体的“谷底”:值得注意的恢复相关饮酒方面(NADIR)的发展和评估。

Identifying "Hitting Bottom" Among Individuals with Alcohol Problems: Development and Evaluation of the Noteworthy Aspects of Drinking Important to Recovery (NADIR).

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of New Mexico , Albuquerque , New Mexico , USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Oct 15;52(12):1602-1615. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1293104. Epub 2017 May 30.

DOI:10.1080/10826084.2017.1293104
PMID:28557550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6107067/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a costly public health concern; yet, many individuals with AUD never receive formal treatment. Prior studies have identified that "hitting bottom" may be an important factor in seeking treatment for AUD) and the notion that "hitting bottom" is necessary for recovery is commonly portrayed in the popular media. Yet, "hitting bottom" has never been formally operationalized.

OBJECTIVES

The present article aimed to operationalize "hitting bottom."

METHODS

A multiphase process was used to develop a measure of hitting bottom among individuals experiencing alcohol problems: The Noteworthy Aspects of Drinking Important to Recovery (NADIR). Psychometric evaluation of the measure was conducted using online data collected from individuals who identified as moderate to heavy drinkers (N = 597).

RESULTS

The NADIR included five lower-order dimensions and one higher-order dimension ("hitting bottom"), had strong concurrent validity with measures of alcohol use severity and alcohol-related problems, and was found to have excellent internal consistency reliability (α > 0.90). An overall summary score on the NADIR of 50+ (factor scores>0) differentiated individuals who had previously sought treatment for AUD and reported more excessive alcohol use compared to those with no treatment history and lower levels of alcohol use. Thus, the NADIR with a cutoff of 50 may be a good starting point for future researchers to test as a method to identify individuals who have hit bottom. Conclusions/Importance: The NADIR provides a viable operational definition of hitting bottom. Future research should evaluate the predictive validity of the NADIR.

摘要

背景

酒精使用障碍(AUD)是一个代价高昂的公共卫生问题;然而,许多 AUD 患者从未接受过正规治疗。先前的研究已经确定“触底”可能是寻求 AUD 治疗的一个重要因素,而“触底”是恢复的必要条件的观点在大众媒体中经常被描绘。然而,“触底”从未被正式操作化。

目的

本文旨在对“触底”进行操作化。

方法

采用多阶段过程来开发一种衡量有酒精问题的个体“触底”的方法:值得注意的恢复方面的饮酒(NADIR)。使用从自认为是中度至重度饮酒者(N=597)中收集的在线数据对该测量方法进行了心理测量评估。

结果

NADIR 包括五个较低阶维度和一个较高阶维度(“触底”),与酒精使用严重程度和与酒精相关问题的测量具有很强的同时效度,并且具有极好的内部一致性信度(α>0.90)。NADIR 的总分在 50 分以上(因子得分>0)可区分那些曾寻求 AUD 治疗且报告的酒精使用更过度的个体,与无治疗史和较低酒精使用水平的个体相比。因此,NADIR 的 50 分可能是未来研究人员测试作为识别触底个体的一种方法的一个良好起点。结论/意义:NADIR 为“触底”提供了一个可行的操作定义。未来的研究应该评估 NADIR 的预测有效性。