• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么我们不想让每个人都安全呢?苏格兰吸毒者家属对吸毒室实施的看法。

'Why would we not want to keep everybody safe?' The views of family members of people who use drugs on the implementation of drug consumption rooms in Scotland.

机构信息

Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.

School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2022 Aug 29;19(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00679-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12954-022-00679-5
PMID:36038919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9421633/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People who use drugs in Scotland are currently experiencing disproportionately high rates of drug-related deaths. Drug consumption rooms (DCRs) are harm reduction services that offer a safe, hygienic environment where pre-obtained drugs can be consumed under supervision. The aim of this research was to explore family member perspectives on DCR implementation in Scotland in order to inform national policy.

METHODS

Scotland-based family members of people who were currently or formerly using drugs were invited to take part in semi-structured interviews to share views on DCRs. An inclusive approach to 'family' was taken, and family members were recruited via local and national networks. A convenience sample of 13 family members were recruited and interviews conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically using the Structured Framework Technique.

RESULTS

Family members demonstrated varying levels of understanding regarding the existence, role, and function of DCRs. While some expressed concern that DCRs would not prevent continued drug use, all participants were in favour of DCR implementation due to a belief that DCRs could reduce harm, including saving lives, and facilitate future recovery from drug use. Participants highlighted challenges faced by people who use drugs in accessing treatment/services that could meet their needs. They identified that accessible and welcoming DCRs led by trusting and non-judgemental staff could help to meet unmet needs, including signposting to other services. Family members viewed DCRs as safe environments and highlighted how the existence of DCRs could reduce the constant worry that they had of risk of harm to their loved ones. Finally, family members emphasised the challenge of stigma associated with drug use. They believed that introduction of DCRs would help to reduce stigma and provide a signal that people who use drugs deserve safety and care.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting the experience and views of family members makes a novel and valuable contribution to ongoing public debates surrounding DCRs. Their views can be used to inform the implementation of DCRs in Scotland but also relate well to the development of wider responses to drug-related harm and reduction of stigma experienced by people who use drugs in Scotland and beyond.

摘要

背景

苏格兰的吸毒者目前正经历着不成比例的高毒品相关死亡率。毒品注射室(DCR)是一种减少伤害的服务,它提供了一个安全、卫生的环境,让预先获得的毒品可以在监督下使用。这项研究的目的是探索苏格兰吸毒者家属对 DCR 实施的看法,以便为国家政策提供信息。

方法

苏格兰的吸毒者目前或曾经的家属被邀请参加半结构化访谈,分享他们对 DCR 的看法。采取了对“家庭”包容性的方法,通过当地和国家网络招募家属。通过方便抽样招募了 13 名家属,并进行了访谈,录音,转录,并使用结构化框架技术进行主题分析。

结果

家属对 DCR 的存在、角色和功能有不同程度的了解。虽然有些人担心 DCR 不会阻止继续吸毒,但所有参与者都赞成实施 DCR,因为他们相信 DCR 可以减少伤害,包括拯救生命,并促进未来的戒毒康复。参与者强调了吸毒者在获得满足其需求的治疗/服务方面面临的挑战。他们认为,由值得信赖和非评判性的工作人员领导的、可及和受欢迎的 DCR 可以帮助满足未满足的需求,包括转介到其他服务。家属认为 DCR 是安全的环境,并强调了 DCR 的存在如何减少他们对亲人受到伤害的持续担忧。最后,家属强调了与吸毒相关的耻辱感带来的挑战。他们认为,引入 DCR 将有助于减少耻辱感,并发出一个信号,表明吸毒者应该得到安全和关怀。

结论

报告家属的经验和观点是对围绕 DCR 的持续公共辩论的新颖而有价值的贡献。他们的观点可以用来为苏格兰 DCR 的实施提供信息,但也与苏格兰乃至更广泛的减少与毒品相关的伤害和减少吸毒者所经历的耻辱感的反应有关。

相似文献

1
'Why would we not want to keep everybody safe?' The views of family members of people who use drugs on the implementation of drug consumption rooms in Scotland.为什么我们不想让每个人都安全呢?苏格兰吸毒者家属对吸毒室实施的看法。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Aug 29;19(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00679-5.
2
A qualitative study of how Danish drug consumption rooms influence health and well-being among people who use drugs.一项关于丹麦吸毒室如何影响吸毒者健康与幸福的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2016 Jun 16;13(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12954-016-0109-y.
3
Mobilizing Drug Consumption Rooms: inter-place networks and harm reduction drug policy.推动设立药物消费室:跨地区网络与减少伤害的药物政策
Health Place. 2015 Jan;31:216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
4
Drug Consumption Rooms and Public Health Policy: Perspectives of Scottish Strategic Decision-Makers.药物使用室与公共卫生政策:苏格兰战略决策制定者的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):6575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116575.
5
'We are still obsessed by this idea of abstinence': A critical analysis of UK news media representations of proposals to introduce drug consumption rooms in Glasgow, UK.“我们仍然痴迷于这种禁欲的想法”:对英国格拉斯哥提议设立毒品注射室的英国新闻媒体报道的批判性分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Jun;68:62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
A cross-sectional national survey assessing self-reported drug intake behavior, contact with the primary sector and drug treatment among service users of Danish drug consumption rooms.一项全国性横断面调查,评估丹麦毒品消费室服务使用者自我报告的药物摄入行为、与初级部门的接触情况以及药物治疗情况。
Harm Reduct J. 2016 Oct 7;13(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12954-016-0115-0.
7
Effects of messaging on public support for drug consumption rooms in scotland, UK.信息传播对英国苏格兰药物消费室公众支持率的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Sep;83:102855. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102855. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
8
High willingness to use drug consumption rooms among people who inject drugs in Scotland: findings from a national bio-behavioural survey among people who inject drugs.苏格兰注射毒品者对使用吸毒室的高度意愿:一项针对注射毒品者的全国生物行为调查的结果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Apr;90:102731. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102731. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
9
'It's not going to be a one size fits all': a qualitative exploration of the potential utility of three drug checking service models in Scotland.“一刀切”的方法不适用:对苏格兰三种药物检测服务模式潜在效用的定性探索。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Jul 27;20(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00830-w.
10
"You know, we can change the services to suit the circumstances of what is happening in the world": a rapid case study of the COVID-19 response across city centre homelessness and health services in Edinburgh, Scotland.“你知道,我们可以根据世界上正在发生的情况来改变服务”:苏格兰爱丁堡市中心无家可归和健康服务应对 COVID-19 的快速案例研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Jun 12;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00508-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of safer drug consumption facilities in Scotland: a mixed methods needs assessment and feasibility study for the city of Edinburgh.苏格兰更安全药物消费设施的实施:爱丁堡市的混合方法需求评估与可行性研究
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jan 13;22(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01144-1.
2
What features of drug treatment programs help, or not, with access? a qualitative study of the perspectives of family members and community-based organization staff in Atlantic Canada.药物治疗项目的哪些特点有助于(或无助于)获得治疗?对加拿大大西洋地区家庭成员和社区组织工作人员观点的定性研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024 Mar 22;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13011-024-00602-0.
3
Understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing and sustaining Mobile Overdose Response Services from the perspective of Canadian key interest groups: a qualitative study.从加拿大主要利益相关者的角度理解实施和维持移动药物过量反应服务的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 2;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00946-7.
4
Record linkage studies of drug-related deaths among adults who were released from prison to the community: a scoping review.监狱释放成年人药物相关死亡的记录链接研究:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 5;23(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15673-0.
5
The acceptability of overdose alert and response technologies: introducing the TPOM-ODART framework.过量用药警报和响应技术的可接受性:引入 TPOM-ODART 框架。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Mar 26;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00763-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug Consumption Rooms and Public Health Policy: Perspectives of Scottish Strategic Decision-Makers.药物使用室与公共卫生政策:苏格兰战略决策制定者的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):6575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116575.
2
Overdose prevention centres in the UK.英国的过量用药预防中心。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e196-e197. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00038-X.
3
Reduced Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalisation with Use of an Unsanctioned Safe Consumption Site for Injection Drug Use in the United States.在美国,使用未经批准的安全注射点可减少急诊就诊和住院治疗。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3853-3860. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07312-4. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Peer Support and Overdose Prevention Responses: A Systematic 'State-of-the-Art' Review.同伴支持和过量预防反应:系统的“最新技术”综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;18(22):12073. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212073.
5
Assessing Drug Consumption Rooms and Longer Term (5 Year) Impacts on Community and Clients.评估药物消费室及其对社区和服务对象的长期(5年)影响。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Nov 15;14:4639-4647. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S244720. eCollection 2021.
6
Impact of an unsanctioned safe consumption site on criminal activity, 2010-2019.2010-2019 年,未批准的安全注射点对犯罪活动的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Mar 1;220:108521. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108521. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
"It's not just injecting drugs": Supervised consumption sites and the social determinants of health.“这不仅仅是注射毒品的问题”:监督下的消费场所与健康的社会决定因素
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Aug 1;213:108078. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108078. Epub 2020 May 23.
8
Communicating the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of government policies and their impact on public support: a systematic review with meta-analysis.传达政府政策的有效性与无效性及其对公众支持的影响:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Jan 15;7(1):190522. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190522. eCollection 2020 Jan.
9
Supervised injection facility use and all-cause mortality among people who inject drugs in Vancouver, Canada: A cohort study.在加拿大温哥华,监管注射设施的使用与注射吸毒者的全因死亡率:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 26;16(11):e1002964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002964. eCollection 2019 Nov.
10
Supervised consumption sites: a nuanced assessment of the causal evidence.监督消费场所:因果证据的细致评估。
Addiction. 2019 Dec;114(12):2109-2115. doi: 10.1111/add.14747. Epub 2019 Aug 1.