Hiby Elly, Atema Kate Nattrass, Brimley Rebecca, Hammond-Seaman Alexandra, Jones Mark, Rowan Andrew, Fogelberg Emelie, Kennedy Mark, Balaram Deepashree, Nel Louis, Cleaveland Sarah, Hampson Katie, Townsend Sunny, Lembo Tiziana, Rooney Nicola, Whay Helen Rebecca, Pritchard Joy, Murray Jane, van Dijk Lisa, Waran Natalie, Bacon Heather, Knobel Darryn, Tasker Lou, Baker Chris, Hiby Lex
ICAM Coalition, c/o IFAW International HQ, Yarmouth Port, MA, USA.
RSPCA International, Horsham, West Sussex, UK.
BMC Vet Res. 2017 May 30;13(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1051-2.
Dogs are ubiquitous in human society and attempts to manage their populations are common to most countries. Managing dog populations is achieved through a range of interventions to suit the dog population dynamics and dog ownership characteristics of the location, with a number of potential impacts or goals in mind. Impact assessment provides the opportunity for interventions to identify areas of inefficiencies for improvement and build evidence of positive change.
This scoping review collates 26 studies that have assessed the impacts of dog population management interventions.
It reports the use of 29 indicators of change under 8 categories of impact and describes variation in the methods used to measure these indicators.
The relatively few published examples of impact assessment in dog population management suggest this field is in its infancy; however this review highlights those notable exceptions. By describing those indicators and methods of measurement that have been reported thus far, and apparent barriers to efficient assessment, this review aims to support and direct future impact assessment.
狗在人类社会中无处不在,大多数国家都普遍尝试对其数量进行管理。通过一系列干预措施来管理狗的数量,这些措施要适合当地的狗数量动态和养狗特征,并考虑到一些潜在影响或目标。影响评估为干预措施提供了机会,以确定需要改进的低效领域,并积累积极变化的证据。
本综述性研究整理了26项评估狗数量管理干预措施影响的研究。
报告了8类影响下29个变化指标的使用情况,并描述了用于衡量这些指标的方法的差异。
在狗数量管理方面,已发表的影响评估实例相对较少,这表明该领域尚处于起步阶段;然而,本综述突出了那些显著的例外情况。通过描述迄今为止所报告的那些指标和测量方法,以及有效评估的明显障碍,本综述旨在支持和指导未来的影响评估。