Boes Lena, Boedeker Birte, Schmich Patrick, Wetzstein Matthias, Wichmann Ole, Remschmidt Cornelius
Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Postgraduate Training for Applied Epidemiology (PAE), Robert Koch Institute, Germany(1).
Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Vaccine. 2017 Jun 27;35(30):3789-3796. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 27.
Influenza vaccination of children with underlying chronic diseases is currently recommended in Germany, but targeting all children constitutes an alternative approach to control seasonal influenza. To inform the modelling of vaccination impact and possible communication activities, we aimed to assess among parents the acceptance of universal childhood vaccination against seasonal influenza and possible modifiers.
We conducted a telephone survey in households in Germany using random digit dialing. We interviewed parents with children aged <18 years by constructing three hypothetical scenarios in subsequent order: (1) hearing about the influenza vaccination recommendation through the media, (2) the vaccine being recommended by a physician, and (3) being informed about the availability of the vaccine as a nasal spray. We calculated the proportion of parents who would immunize their child and used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with influenza vaccination intention.
Response was between 22 and 46%. Of 518 participants, 74% were female, mean age was 41.3 years. Participants had on average 1.6 children with a mean age of 8.9 years. In scenario 1, 52% of parents would immunize their child, compared to 64% in scenario 2 (p<0.01) and to 45% in scenario 3 (p=0.20). Factors independently associated with vaccination acceptance in scenario 1 were previous influenza vaccination of the child or parent (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.5 and 8.6, respectively), perceived severity of influenza (aOR=5.1) and living in eastern Germany (aOR=2.4).
If seasonal influenza vaccination was recommended for all children, more than half of the parents would potentially agree to immunize their child. Involving physicians in future information campaigns is essential to achieve high uptake. As intranasal vaccine administration is non-invasive and easily done, it remains unclear why scenario 3 was associated with low acceptance among parents, and the underlying reasons should be further explored.
目前德国建议对患有潜在慢性病的儿童接种流感疫苗,但针对所有儿童进行接种是控制季节性流感的另一种方法。为了为疫苗接种影响模型和可能的宣传活动提供信息,我们旨在评估父母对普遍的儿童季节性流感疫苗接种的接受程度以及可能的影响因素。
我们在德国的家庭中使用随机数字拨号进行了电话调查。我们通过依次构建三种假设情景来采访有18岁以下子女的父母:(1)通过媒体听说流感疫苗接种建议,(2)医生推荐该疫苗,(3)被告知有鼻喷式疫苗可用。我们计算了愿意为孩子接种疫苗的父母比例,并使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归来确定与流感疫苗接种意愿相关的因素。
回复率在22%至46%之间。在518名参与者中,74%为女性,平均年龄为41.3岁。参与者平均有1.6个孩子,平均年龄为8.9岁。在情景1中,52%的父母愿意为孩子接种疫苗,情景2中这一比例为64%(p<0.01),情景3中为45%(p=0.20)。情景1中与疫苗接种接受度独立相关的因素是孩子或父母之前接种过流感疫苗(调整后的优势比[aOR]分别为4.5和8.6)、感知到的流感严重程度(aOR=5.1)以及居住在德国东部(aOR=2.4)。
如果建议所有儿童接种季节性流感疫苗,超过一半的父母可能会同意为孩子接种。让医生参与未来的宣传活动对于实现高接种率至关重要。由于鼻内接种疫苗是非侵入性的且操作简便,目前尚不清楚为何情景3与父母的低接受度相关,其潜在原因应进一步探究。