Petković Hrvoje, Lukežič Tadeja, Šušković Jagoda
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Department of Microbial Natural Products, Helmholtz-Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI) and Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Saarland University, Campus E 8.1, DE-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Food Technol Biotechnol. 2017 Mar;55(1):3-13. doi: 10.17113/ftb.55.01.17.4617.
Natural tetracycline (TC) antibiotics were the first major class of therapeutics to earn the distinction of 'broad-spectrum antibiotics' and they have been used since the 1940s against a wide range of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, mycoplasmas, intracellular chlamydiae, rickettsiae and protozoan parasites. The second generation of semisynthetic tetracyclines, such as minocycline and doxycycline, with improved antimicrobial potency, were introduced during the 1960s. Despite emerging resistance to TCs erupting during the 1980s, it was not until 2006, more than four decades later, that a third--generation TC, named tigecycline, was launched. In addition, two TC analogues, omadacycline and eravacycline, developed (semi)synthetic and fully synthetic routes, respectively, are at present under clinical evaluation. Interestingly, despite very productive early work on the isolation of a mutant strain that produced 6-demethyl-7-chlortetracycline, the key intermediate in the production of second- and third-generation TCs, biosynthetic approaches in TC development have not been productive for more than 50 years. Relatively slow and tedious molecular biology approaches for the genetic manipulation of TC-producing actinobacteria, as well as an insufficient understanding of the enzymatic mechanisms involved in TC biosynthesis have significantly contributed to the low success of such biosynthetic engineering efforts. However, new opportunities in TC drug development have arisen thanks to a significant progress in the development of affordable and versatile biosynthetic engineering and synthetic biology approaches, and, importantly, to a much deeper understanding of TC biosynthesis, mostly gained over the last two decades.
天然四环素(TC)抗生素是首批获得“广谱抗生素”殊荣的主要治疗药物类别,自20世纪40年代以来,它们就被用于对抗多种革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体、支原体、细胞内衣原体、立克次氏体和原生动物寄生虫。20世纪60年代引入了第二代半合成四环素,如米诺环素和多西环素,其抗菌效力有所提高。尽管在20世纪80年代出现了对四环素的耐药性,但直到40多年后的2006年,第三代四环素替加环素才上市。此外,两种分别通过(半)合成和全合成路线开发的四环素类似物奥马环素和依拉环素目前正在进行临床评估。有趣的是,尽管早期在分离产生6-去甲基-7-氯四环素(第二代和第三代四环素生产中的关键中间体)的突变菌株方面开展了卓有成效的工作,但在四环素开发中,生物合成方法在50多年里一直没有取得成效。用于对产生四环素的放线菌进行基因操作的分子生物学方法相对缓慢且繁琐,以及对四环素生物合成所涉及的酶促机制了解不足,这些都显著导致了此类生物合成工程努力的成功率较低。然而,由于在经济实惠且通用的生物合成工程和合成生物学方法的开发方面取得了重大进展,更重要的是,由于对四环素生物合成有了更深入的了解(主要是在过去二十年中获得的),四环素药物开发出现了新的机遇。