• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

源自同胞群体的孟德尔群体中的利他主义:对干草堆模型的重新审视

ALTRUISM IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS DERIVED FROM SIBLING GROUPS: THE HAYSTACK MODEL REVISITED.

作者信息

Wilson David Sloan

机构信息

Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 49060.

出版信息

Evolution. 1987 Sep;41(5):1059-1070. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05876.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05876.x
PMID:28563418
Abstract

A group-selection model is presented in which each group is initiated by a single fertilized female and persists for several generations before dispersal. Maynard Smith (1964) concluded that altruism could not plausibly evolve under these circumstances. I show that his conclusion is an artifact of a simplifying assumption that amounts to a worst-case scenario for group selection. When the standard donor-recipient equations for altruistic behavior are used in Maynard Smith's model, Mendelian populations derived from sibling groups are often more favorable for the evolution of altruism than are the sibling groups themselves. In general, long-term and large-scale aspects of population structure may at times be important in the evolution of altruistic and other group-advantageous behaviors.

摘要

本文提出了一种群体选择模型,其中每个群体由一只受精雌虫创建,并在扩散前持续几代。梅纳德·史密斯(1964年)得出结论,在这种情况下利他行为不太可能进化。我表明,他的结论是一个简化假设的产物,该假设相当于群体选择的最坏情况。当将利他行为的标准 donor-recipient 方程用于梅纳德·史密斯的模型时,源自同胞群体的孟德尔群体通常比对同胞群体本身更有利于利他行为的进化。一般来说,种群结构的长期和大规模方面有时可能在利他行为和其他群体优势行为的进化中很重要。

相似文献

1
ALTRUISM IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS DERIVED FROM SIBLING GROUPS: THE HAYSTACK MODEL REVISITED.源自同胞群体的孟德尔群体中的利他主义:对干草堆模型的重新审视
Evolution. 1987 Sep;41(5):1059-1070. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05876.x.
2
Strong altruism can evolve in randomly formed groups.强烈的利他主义能够在随机形成的群体中进化。
J Theor Biol. 2004 Jun 7;228(3):303-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.01.004.
3
The evolution of altruism between siblings: Hamilton's rule revisited.兄弟姐妹间利他行为的演化:重新审视汉密尔顿法则
J Theor Biol. 2006 Aug 21;241(4):774-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
4
Joint evolution of altruistic cooperation and dispersal in a metapopulation of small local populations.小局部种群集合种群中利他合作与扩散的联合进化
Theor Popul Biol. 2013 May;85:12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
5
Positive effects of multiple gene control on the spread of altruism by group selection.群体选择通过多个基因控制对利他主义传播的积极影响。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Sep 7;284(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 May 23.
6
The co-evolution of culturally inherited altruistic helping and cultural transmission under random group formation.随机群体形成下文化传承的利他性帮助与文化传播的共同进化。
Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Jun;73(4):506-16. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
7
Evolution of altruism in stepping-stone populations with overlapping generations.具有世代重叠的跳板种群中利他行为的进化。
Theor Popul Biol. 2001 Dec;60(4):315-25. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1533.
8
The evolution of group dispersal with leaders and followers.有领导者和跟随者的群体扩散的演变。
J Theor Biol. 2015 Apr 21;371:117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
9
Evolutionary stability for large populations.大种群的进化稳定性。
J Theor Biol. 2004 Apr 7;227(3):397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.11.017.
10
Complicating the Story of Popular Science: John Maynard Smith's "Little Penguin" on The Theory of Evolution.科普故事的复杂性:约翰·梅纳德·史密斯关于进化论的“小企鹅”
J Hist Biol. 2019 Sep;52(3):371-390. doi: 10.1007/s10739-019-9566-y. Epub 2019 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The future of evolutionary medicine: sparking innovation in biomedicine and public health.进化医学的未来:激发生物医学与公共卫生领域的创新。
Front Sci. 2023;1. doi: 10.3389/fsci.2023.997136. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Directional selection coupled with kin selection favors the establishment of senescence.定向选择和亲属选择有利于衰老的建立。
BMC Biol. 2023 Oct 23;21(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01716-w.
3
Choice of cooperation strategy under demand updating and altruistic behavior.
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 7;9(9):e19844. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19844. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Transient commensal clonal interactions can drive tumor metastasis.短暂的共生克隆相互作用可驱动肿瘤转移。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 16;11(1):5799. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19584-1.
5
Kin and multilevel selection in social evolution: a never-ending controversy?社会进化中的亲属选择和多层次选择:一场永无休止的争论?
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 28;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8018.1. eCollection 2016.
6
The evolution of adhesiveness as a social adaptation.作为一种社会适应性的黏附性的演变。
Elife. 2015 Nov 27;4:e08595. doi: 10.7554/eLife.08595.
7
Cancer across the tree of life: cooperation and cheating in multicellularity.生命之树上的癌症:多细胞生物中的合作与欺骗
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 19;370(1673). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0219.
8
Individuals and groups in evolution: Darwinian pluralism and the multilevel selection debate.进化中的个体与群体:达尔文多元论与多层次选择辩论
J Biosci. 2014 Apr;39(2):319-25. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9345-4.
9
Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple Walk Away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups.在移动生物中合作是否可行?简单的“走开”规则有利于群体中合作行为的进化。
Evol Hum Behav. 2011 Jul;32(4):263-276. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.01.002.
10
Analytical results for individual and group selection of any intensity.任何强度的个体选择和群体选择的分析结果。
Bull Math Biol. 2008 Jul;70(5):1410-24. doi: 10.1007/s11538-008-9305-6. Epub 2008 Apr 2.