Jenkins Cheryl D, Kirkpatrick Mark
Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 78712.
Evolution. 1995 Jun;49(3):512-520. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02283.x.
It is often proposed that the ability of diploids to mask deleterious mutations leads to an evolutionary advantage over haploidy. In this paper, we studied the evolution of the relative duration of haploid and diploid phases using a model of recurrent deleterious mutations across the entire genome. We found that a completely diploid life cycle is favored under biologically reasonable conditions, even when prolonging the diploid phase reduces a population's mean fitness. A haploid cycle is favored when there is complete linkage throughout the genome or when mutations are either highly deleterious or partially dominant. These results hold when loci interact multiplicatively and for synergistic epistasis. The strength of selection generated on the life cycle can be substantial because of the cumulative effect of selection against mutations across many loci. We did not find conditions that support cycles that retain both phases, such as those found in some plants and algae. Thus, selection against deleterious mutations may be an important force in the evolution of life cycles but may not be sufficient to explain all the patterns of life cycles seen in nature.
人们常认为,二倍体掩盖有害突变的能力使其相对于单倍体具有进化优势。在本文中,我们使用一个关于全基因组反复出现有害突变的模型,研究了单倍体和二倍体阶段相对持续时间的进化。我们发现,在生物学上合理的条件下,完全二倍体的生命周期是有利的,即使延长二倍体阶段会降低种群的平均适合度。当整个基因组存在完全连锁,或者突变要么高度有害要么部分显性时,单倍体周期是有利的。当基因座以乘积方式相互作用以及存在协同上位性时,这些结果依然成立。由于针对许多基因座上的突变进行选择的累积效应,在生命周期上产生的选择强度可能很大。我们没有找到支持同时保留两个阶段的周期(如在一些植物和藻类中发现的那样)的条件。因此,针对有害突变的选择可能是生命周期进化中的一个重要力量,但可能不足以解释自然界中观察到的所有生命周期模式。