Simms Ellen L, Triplett Jim
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60637.
Department of Biology, Box 7325 Reynolda Station, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27109.
Evolution. 1994 Dec;48(6):1973-1985. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02227.x.
A major assumption of models of the evolution of plant resistance to disease is that plant resistance involves fitness costs. To test this assumption, a field experiment was performed so that a quantitative-genetic analysis could be used to detect fitness costs to Ipomoea purpurea of resistance to different fungal isolates of Colletotrichum dematium, a pathogenic fungus causing the disease anthracnose. This experiment yielded no evidence that resistance to anthracnose involves direct fitness costs. Nevertheless, trade-offs in plant fitness that were unrelated to resistance were detected between different disease environments. Tolerance, defined as the ability to compensate in part for fitness decrements caused by disease, was found to involve fitness costs. Halfsib families that were more tolerant of disease had lower fitness in the absence of disease. The possibility that the cost of tolerance could obscure fitness costs of resistance is explored.
植物抗病性进化模型的一个主要假设是植物抗性涉及适合度代价。为了检验这一假设,进行了一项田间试验,以便利用数量遗传学分析来检测紫牵牛对引起炭疽病的病原真菌——胶孢炭疽菌不同真菌分离株的抗性所带来的适合度代价。该实验没有提供证据表明对炭疽病的抗性涉及直接的适合度代价。然而,在不同的病害环境之间检测到了与抗性无关的植物适合度权衡。耐受性被定义为部分补偿由病害导致的适合度下降的能力,结果发现它涉及适合度代价。对病害耐受性更强的半同胞家系在无病害情况下适合度较低。本文探讨了耐受性代价可能掩盖抗性适合度代价的可能性。