Nerlekar Nitesh, Ko Brian S, Nasis Arthur, Cameron James D, Leung Michael, Brown Adam J, Wong Dennis T L, Ngu Philip J, Troupis John M, Seneviratne Sujith K
Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, 3168 VIC, Australia.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, MMC, Southern Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Jun;7(3):296-304. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.05.
To assess the impact of elevated heart rate (HR) on the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of second-generation 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography (320-CTCA).
Consecutive patients with suspected coronary disease referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were prospectively recruited and underwent 320-CTCA. Pre-scan beta-blockers were administered if native HR>80 bpm and post-scan cohorts stratified by traditional (HR ≤60 bpm) and elevated HR (61-80 bpm). A wider phase window was used for the elevated HR group (30-80%). 320-CTCA and ICA were analyzed by independent readers blinded to other data. Significant disease was defined as ≥50% visual stenosis on ICA. Uninterpretable segments by 320-CTCA were considered to be significant on an intention-to-diagnose principle. Image quality was assessed by 5-point Likert score.
Of 107 patients studied (1,662 segments), there was no significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value between patients with HR ≤60 bpm (n=55) . HR 61-80 bpm (n=52): 97%, 88%, 95%, 94% . 100%, 88%, 95%, 100%; Receiver operator characteristic-area under the curve 0.93 . 0.94, P=0.82). Overall per-patient diagnostic accuracy was 96% in both groups with no significant difference in interpretable segments (Likert ≥2) or median radiation dose (2.4 mSv . 2.7 mSv, P=0.35). Only 4/1,662 (0.2%) segments were uninterpretable by motion artefact in the whole cohort.
In patients with HR >60 and up to 80bpm, second generation 320-CTCA provides comparably adequate diagnostic accuracy to HR ≤60 without significantly impacting upon overall segmental evaluability.
评估心率(HR)升高对第二代320排螺旋CT冠状动脉造影(320-CTCA)诊断准确性和图像质量的影响。
前瞻性招募因疑似冠心病而接受有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)的连续患者,并进行320-CTCA检查。如果静息心率>80次/分钟,则在扫描前给予β受体阻滞剂,并根据传统标准(HR≤60次/分钟)和心率升高(61-80次/分钟)对扫描后队列进行分层。心率升高组使用更宽的相位窗(30-80%)。由对其他数据不知情的独立阅片者分析320-CTCA和ICA。显著病变定义为ICA上视觉狭窄≥50%。根据意向性诊断原则,320-CTCA无法解读的节段被视为显著病变。图像质量采用5分李克特量表评分。
在研究的107例患者(1662个节段)中,HR≤60次/分钟的患者(n=55)与HR 61-80次/分钟的患者(n=52)在敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值方面无显著差异:分别为97%、88%、95%、94%和100%、88%、95%、100%;受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.93和0.94,P=0.82)。两组患者的总体诊断准确性均为96%,可解读节段(李克特量表≥2)或中位辐射剂量(2.4 mSv和2.7 mSv,P=0.35)无显著差异。在整个队列中,仅4/1662(0.2%)个节段因运动伪影无法解读。
在心率>60至80次/分钟的患者中,第二代320-CTCA提供的诊断准确性与心率≤60次/分钟的患者相当,且对整体节段可评估性无显著影响。