Cuttler Carrie, Spradlin Alexander, Nusbaum Amy T, Whitney Paul, Hinson John M, McLaughlin Ryan J
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.
Translational Addiction Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Aug;234(15):2299-2309. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4648-z. Epub 2017 May 31.
One of the most commonly cited reasons for chronic cannabis use is to cope with stress. Consistent with this, cannabis users have shown reduced emotional arousal and dampened stress reactivity in response to negative imagery.
To our knowledge, the present study represents the first to examine the effects of an acute stress manipulation on subjective stress and salivary cortisol in chronic cannabis users compared to non-users.
Forty cannabis users and 42 non-users were randomly assigned to complete either the stress or no stress conditions of the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST). The stress condition of the MAST manipulates both physiological (placing hand in ice bath) and psychosocial stress (performing math under conditions of social evaluation). Participants gave baseline subjective stress ratings before, during, and after the stress manipulation. Cortisol was measured from saliva samples obtained before and after the stress manipulation. Further, cannabis cravings and symptoms of withdrawal were measured.
Subjective stress ratings and cortisol levels were significantly higher in non-users in the stress condition relative to non-users in the no stress condition. In contrast, cannabis users demonstrated blunted stress reactivity; specifically, they showed no increase in cortisol and a significantly smaller increase in subjective stress ratings. The stress manipulation had no impact on cannabis users' self-reported cravings or withdrawal symptoms.
Chronic cannabis use is associated with blunted stress reactivity. Future research is needed to determine whether this helps to confer resiliency or vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology as well as the mechanisms underlying this effect.
长期使用大麻最常被提及的原因之一是应对压力。与此一致的是,大麻使用者在面对负面意象时表现出情绪唤醒降低和应激反应减弱。
据我们所知,本研究是首例比较长期大麻使用者与非使用者在急性应激操作下主观应激和唾液皮质醇水平的研究。
40名大麻使用者和42名非使用者被随机分配,以完成马斯特里赫特急性应激测试(MAST)的应激或无应激条件。MAST的应激条件同时操纵生理应激(将手放入冰浴)和心理社会应激(在社会评价条件下进行数学运算)。参与者在应激操作前、期间和之后给出基线主观应激评分。从应激操作前后采集的唾液样本中测量皮质醇。此外,测量大麻渴望和戒断症状。
与无应激条件下的非使用者相比,应激条件下的非使用者主观应激评分和皮质醇水平显著更高。相比之下,大麻使用者表现出应激反应迟钝;具体而言,他们的皮质醇没有增加,主观应激评分的增加也显著更小。应激操作对大麻使用者自我报告渴望或戒断症状没有影响。
长期使用大麻与应激反应迟钝有关。需要进一步研究以确定这是否有助于赋予对与应激相关精神病理学的恢复力或易感性,以及这种效应背后的机制。