Voříšková Alena, Jansa Jan, Püschel David, Krüger Manuela, Cajthaml Tomáš, Vosátka Miroslav, Janoušková Martina
Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.
Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 5, Prague, 128 44, Czech Republic.
Mycorrhiza. 2017 Aug;27(6):577-585. doi: 10.1007/s00572-017-0777-9. Epub 2017 May 31.
Root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can be quantified by different approaches. We compared two approaches that enable discrimination of specific AMF taxa and are therefore emerging as alternative to most commonly performed microscopic quantification of AMF in roots: quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using markers in nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) and mitochondrial ribosomal DNA (mtDNA). In a greenhouse experiment, Medicago truncatula was inoculated with four isolates belonging to different AMF species (Rhizophagus irregularis, Claroideoglomus claroideum, Gigaspora margarita and Funneliformis mosseae). The AMF were quantified in the root samples by qPCR targeted to both markers, microscopy and contents of AMF-specific phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA). Copy numbers of nrDNA and mtDNA were closely related within all isolates; however, the slopes and intercepts of the linear relationships significantly differed among the isolates. Across all isolates, a large proportion of variance in nrDNA copy numbers was explained by root colonization intensity or contents of AMF-specific PLFA, while variance in mtDNA copy numbers was mainly explained by differences among AMF isolates. We propose that the encountered inter-isolate differences in the ratios of mtDNA and nrDNA copy numbers reflect different physiological states of the isolates. Our results suggest that nrDNA is a more suitable marker region than mtDNA for the quantification of multiple AMF taxa as its copy numbers are better related to fungal biomass across taxa than are copy numbers of mtDNA.
丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)在根部的定殖可以通过不同方法进行量化。我们比较了两种能够区分特定AMF分类群的方法,因此它们正逐渐成为根部AMF最常用的显微镜量化方法的替代方法:使用核糖体DNA(nrDNA)和线粒体核糖体DNA(mtDNA)中的标记进行定量实时PCR(qPCR)。在温室实验中,用属于不同AMF物种的四种分离物(不规则球囊霉、明球囊霉、珠状巨孢囊霉和摩西管柄囊霉)接种蒺藜苜蓿。通过针对这两种标记的qPCR、显微镜检查和AMF特异性磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)含量对根样本中的AMF进行量化。在所有分离物中,nrDNA和mtDNA的拷贝数密切相关;然而,线性关系的斜率和截距在分离物之间存在显著差异。在所有分离物中,nrDNA拷贝数的很大一部分变异可以由根部定殖强度或AMF特异性PLFA含量来解释,而mtDNA拷贝数的变异主要由AMF分离物之间的差异来解释。我们认为,在mtDNA和nrDNA拷贝数比率中遇到的分离物间差异反映了分离物的不同生理状态。我们的结果表明,对于多种AMF分类群的量化,nrDNA是比mtDNA更合适的标记区域,因为其拷贝数与不同分类群的真菌生物量的相关性比mtDNA拷贝数更好。