• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将运动松动术纳入伴有肩袖相关疼痛患者的标准运动方案中:一项随机、安慰剂对照方案试验。

The inclusion of mobilisation with movement to a standard exercise programme for patients with rotator cuff related pain: a randomised, placebo-controlled protocol trial.

机构信息

Science of Rehabilitation programme at Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Rua Sarmento Leite, 245, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP 90050-170, Brazil.

, São Leopoldo, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 12;21(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03765-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-020-03765-6
PMID:33183274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7663889/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff related pain (RCRP) is one of the most common sources of musculoskeletal shoulder pain affecting the general population. Conservative treatment, in the form of exercise, is considered the first line approach, nonetheless, improvements seem to be modest. One therapeutic modality that might be an adjunct to the treatment of this condition is mobilisation with movement (MWM). MWM is a pain-free manual procedure that targets restricted and painful movements, commonly seen in patients with RCRP. The purpose of clinical trial is to determine whether MWM with exercise has benefits over sham MWM with exercise in RCRP.

METHODS

A randomised, sham-controlled trial of 70 adults complaining of RCRP will compare the effects of MWM combined with exercise over sham MWM with exercise. Participants will be allocated to one of two groups: exercise and MWM (EG) or exercise and sham MWM (CG). Two weekly individual treatment sessions will be conducted over five weeks. All assessments will be performed by a blinded assessor. Primary outcome measures will be the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) and the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), assessed at baseline, discharge and one-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures will be active range of motion, self-efficacy and the global rating of change scale. The analyses will be conducted considering a statistically significant p-value ≤0.05. Normality will be assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and homogeneity with the Levene's test. For the primary outcome measures (SPADI and NPRS) and self-efficacy, a 2 × 3 ANOVA with treatment group (EG versus CG) and time (baseline, end of the treatment and follow-up) factors will be performed. Separate 2 × 2 ANOVA will be used for range of motion (baseline and end of the treatment). Global rating scale of change analysis will be conducted using descriptive statistics. Intention-to-treat analysis will be adopted.

DISCUSSION

As there is a paucity of longitudinal studies investigating the use of MWM in patients with RCRP, this study will help to better understand its role together with a structured exercise programme.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Registry number NCT04175184 . November, 2019.

摘要

背景

肩袖相关疼痛(RCRP)是影响普通人群的最常见肌肉骨骼肩部疼痛源之一。以运动为形式的保守治疗被认为是首选方法,然而,改善效果似乎有限。一种可能是这种疾病治疗辅助手段的治疗方法是松动运动(MWM)。MWM 是一种无疼痛的手动程序,针对 RCRP 患者常见的受限和疼痛运动。临床试验的目的是确定 RCRP 中 MWM 结合运动是否比假 MWM 结合运动更有优势。

方法

一项针对 70 名患有 RCRP 的成年人的随机、假对照试验将比较 MWM 结合运动与假 MWM 结合运动的效果。参与者将被分配到以下两个组之一:运动和 MWM(EG)或运动和假 MWM(CG)。在五周内每周进行两次个体治疗。所有评估都将由一名盲法评估者进行。主要结局指标是肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)和数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS),在基线、出院和一个月随访时进行评估。次要结局指标是主动活动范围、自我效能和整体变化量表评分。分析将考虑到具有统计学意义的 p 值≤0.05。正态性将通过 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验进行评估,同质性将通过 Levene 检验进行评估。对于主要结局指标(SPADI 和 NPRS)和自我效能,将进行 2×3 ANOVA 处理组(EG 与 CG)和时间(基线、治疗结束和随访)因素。单独的 2×2 ANOVA 将用于运动范围(基线和治疗结束时)。整体变化量表分析将采用描述性统计。将采用意向治疗分析。

讨论

由于缺乏对 RCRP 患者使用 MWM 的纵向研究,因此本研究将有助于更好地了解其与结构化运动方案一起的作用。

试验注册

临床试验注册号 NCT04175184。2019 年 11 月。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef5d/7663889/317b8d80efe1/12891_2020_3765_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef5d/7663889/1045b25c41a9/12891_2020_3765_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef5d/7663889/317b8d80efe1/12891_2020_3765_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef5d/7663889/1045b25c41a9/12891_2020_3765_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef5d/7663889/317b8d80efe1/12891_2020_3765_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The inclusion of mobilisation with movement to a standard exercise programme for patients with rotator cuff related pain: a randomised, placebo-controlled protocol trial.将运动松动术纳入伴有肩袖相关疼痛患者的标准运动方案中:一项随机、安慰剂对照方案试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 12;21(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03765-6.
2
In people with shoulder pain, mobilisation with movement and exercise improves function and pain more than sham mobilisation with movement and exercise: a randomised trial.在患有肩部疼痛的人群中,运动性关节松动术联合运动锻炼比假手关节松动术联合运动锻炼更能改善功能和疼痛:一项随机试验。
J Physiother. 2024 Oct;70(4):288-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2024.08.009. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Initial effect of high-volume mobilisation with movement on shoulder range of motion and pain in patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (Evolution Trial).高容量动员与运动对肩袖相关肩痛患者肩部活动度和疼痛的初始影响:一项随机对照试验方案(Evolution 试验)。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e069919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069919.
4
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a physiotherapy program for chronic rotator cuff pathology: a protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.一项针对慢性肩袖损伤病理的物理治疗方案的疗效和成本效益:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Aug 31;8:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-86.
5
Efficacy of standardised manual therapy and home exercise programme for chronic rotator cuff disease: randomised placebo controlled trial.标准化手法治疗和家庭运动方案治疗慢性肩袖疾病的疗效:随机安慰剂对照试验。
BMJ. 2010 Jun 8;340:c2756. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2756.
6
To allow or avoid pain during shoulder rehabilitation exercises for patients with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy-Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (the PASE trial).允许或避免慢性肩袖肌腱病患者肩部康复运动中的疼痛 - 一项随机对照试验(PASE 试验)的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Feb 21;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07973-6.
7
Efficacy of five-step shoulder manipulation for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.五步骤肩部推拿治疗肩袖相关肩痛的疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 7;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07540-5.
8
Rotator cuff unloading versus loading exercise program in the conservative treatment of patients with rotator cuff tear: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.肩袖卸载与加载运动方案在肩袖撕裂保守治疗中的应用:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e040820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040820.
9
Dry needling in a multimodal rehabilitation protocol following rotator cuff repair surgery: study protocol for a double-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial.肩袖修复术后多模式康复方案中的干针疗法:一项双盲随机假对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 26;24(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06269-1.
10
Progressive early passive and active exercise therapy after surgical rotator cuff repair - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (the CUT-N-MOVE trial).肩袖修复术后渐进性早期被动和主动运动疗法——一项随机对照试验的研究方案(CUT-N-MOVE试验)
Trials. 2018 Sep 3;19(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2839-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial effect of high-volume mobilisation with movement on shoulder range of motion and pain in patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (Evolution Trial).高容量动员与运动对肩袖相关肩痛患者肩部活动度和疼痛的初始影响:一项随机对照试验方案(Evolution 试验)。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e069919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069919.

本文引用的文献

1
An Update of Systematic Reviews Examining the Effectiveness of Conservative Physical Therapy Interventions for Subacromial Shoulder Pain.系统评价更新:保守物理治疗干预对肩峰下疼痛的有效性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Mar;50(3):131-141. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.8498. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
2
Patients' experience of shoulder disorders: a systematic review of qualitative studies for the OMERACT Shoulder Core Domain Set.患者肩部疾病的体验:针对OMERACT肩部核心领域集的定性研究的系统评价
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Mar 6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez046.
3
Self-efficacy and risk of persistent shoulder pain: results of a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis.
自我效能感与持续性肩部疼痛风险:分类回归树(CART)分析的结果。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;53(13):825-834. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099450. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
Physical therapy versus natural history in outcomes of rotator cuff tears: the Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup (ROW) cohort study.物理治疗与肩袖撕裂自然转归的比较:肩袖结局工作组(ROW)队列研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):833-838. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Towards an integrated clinical framework for patient with shoulder pain.建立针对肩痛患者的综合临床框架。
Arch Physiother. 2018 May 30;8:7. doi: 10.1186/s40945-018-0050-3. eCollection 2018.
6
Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies.慢性疼痛的最小临床重要差异因基线疼痛和方法学因素而异:系统评价实证研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:87-106.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 21.
7
Shoulder MRI features with clinical correlations in subacromial pain syndrome: a cross-sectional and prognostic study.肩峰下疼痛综合征的肩部MRI特征及其与临床的相关性:一项横断面和预后研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Nov 21;18(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1827-3.
8
Effectiveness of conservative interventions including exercise, manual therapy and medical management in adults with shoulder impingement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.包括运动、手法治疗和药物治疗在内的保守干预措施对成人肩部撞击症的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;51(18):1340-1347. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096515. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
9
Shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review of clinical trial participant selection criteria.肩部撞击综合征:对临床试验参与者选择标准的系统评价
Shoulder Elbow. 2017 Jan;9(1):31-41. doi: 10.1177/1758573216663201. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
10
Specific or general exercise strategy for subacromial impingement syndrome-does it matter? A systematic literature review and meta analysis.针对肩峰下撞击综合征的特定或一般运动策略——这重要吗?一项系统的文献综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 17;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1518-0.