Lovrenčić Marijana Vučić, Biljak Vanja Radišić, Blaslov Kristina, Božičević Sandra, Duvnjak Lea Smirčić
Marijana Vučić Lovrenčić, Vanja Radišić Biljak, Sandra Božičević, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Merkur University Hospital, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
World J Diabetes. 2017 May 15;8(5):222-229. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i5.222.
To evaluate the influence of creatinine methodology on the performance of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-Epidemiology Collaboration Group-calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI-eGFR) for CKD diagnosis/staging in a large cohort of diabetic patients.
Fasting blood samples were taken from diabetic patients attending our clinic for their regular annual examination, including laboratory measurement of serum creatinine and eGFR.
Our results indicated an overall excellent agreement in CKD staging (kappa = 0.918) between the Jaffé serum creatinine- and enzymatic serum creatinine-based CKD-EPI-eGFR, with 9% of discordant cases. As compared to the enzymatic creatinine, the majority of discordances (8%) were positive, ., associated with the more advanced CKD stage re-classification, whereas only 1% of cases were negatively discordant if Jaffé creatinine was used for eGFR calculation. A minor proportion of the discordant cases (3.5%) were re-classified into clinically relevant CKD stage indicating mildly to moderately decreased kidney function (< 60 mL/min per 1.73 m). Significant acute and chronic hyperglycaemia, assessed as plasma glucose and HbA levels far above the recommended glycaemic goals, was associated with positively discordant cases. Due to a very low frequency, positive discordance is not likely to present a great burden for the health-care providers, while intensified medical care may actually be beneficial for the small number of discordant patients. On the other hand, a very low proportion of negatively discordant cases (1%) at the 60 mL/min per 1.73 m eGFR level indicate a negligible possibility to miss the CKD diagnosis, which could be the most prominent clinical problem affecting patient care, considering high risk of CKD for adverse patient outcomes.
This study indicate that compensated Jaffé creatinine procedure, in spite of the glucose-dependent bias, is not inferior to enzymatic creatinine in CKD diagnosis/staging and therefore may provide a reliable and cost-effective tool for the renal function assessment in diabetic patients.
评估肌酐检测方法对慢性肾脏病(CKD)-流行病学合作组计算的估计肾小球滤过率(CKD-EPI-eGFR)在一大群糖尿病患者中用于CKD诊断/分期的性能的影响。
从到我们诊所进行定期年度检查的糖尿病患者中采集空腹血样,包括血清肌酐和eGFR的实验室检测。
我们的结果表明,基于Jaffé法血清肌酐和酶法血清肌酐的CKD-EPI-eGFR在CKD分期方面总体一致性极佳(kappa = 0.918),不一致病例占9%。与酶法肌酐相比,大多数不一致情况(8%)为阳性,即与更晚期的CKD分期重新分类相关,而如果使用Jaffé法肌酐计算eGFR,只有1%的病例为阴性不一致。一小部分不一致病例(3.5%)被重新分类到临床相关的CKD分期,表明肾功能轻度至中度下降(<60 ml/min/1.73 m²)。显著的急性和慢性高血糖,以血浆葡萄糖和糖化血红蛋白水平远高于推荐的血糖目标来评估,与阳性不一致病例相关。由于频率很低,阳性不一致不太可能给医疗服务提供者带来很大负担,而强化医疗护理实际上可能对少数不一致患者有益。另一方面,在eGFR为60 ml/min/1.73 m²水平时,阴性不一致病例的比例非常低(1%),这表明漏诊CKD的可能性极小,考虑到CKD对患者不良结局的高风险这可能是影响患者护理的最突出临床问题。
本研究表明,尽管存在葡萄糖依赖性偏差,但补偿性Jaffé法肌酐检测程序在CKD诊断/分期方面并不逊于酶法肌酐,因此可为糖尿病患者的肾功能评估提供一种可靠且经济有效的工具。