Pandey Chandra K, Saluja Vandana, Gaurav Kumar, Tandon Manish, Pandey Vijay K, Bhadoria Ajeet S
Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Jan;145(1):84-89. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_749_14.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Coagulation and haemostasis are dynamic processes. The haemostatic changes in liver disease affect all aspects of coagulation. The prothrombin time (PT)/ international normalized ratio (INR) was developed to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy and the activated partial thromboplastin time to investigate inheritable single factor deficiencies. Viscoelastic tests such as thromboelastogram (TEG) give information about dynamics of clot formation (coagulation factor and anticoagulant activity), clot strength (platelets and fibrinogen) and clot stability (finbrinolysis and factor XIII). Administration of blood products before invasive procedures is still guided by INR and platelet count in patients of liver disease. This study was aimed to evaluate the validity of TEG to predict post-procedural bleed after central venous cannulation in patients with cirrhosis.
Ninety patients aged 20-70 yr diagnosed with liver cirrhosis requiring elective central venous catheter (CVC) insertion were studied. Platelet count, INR, serum creatinine, TEG and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score were recorded before the procedure. Right-sided internal jugular vein was cannulated. On the basis of presence or absence of post-procedural bleed, patients were divided into bleeding and non-bleeding groups. The CTP score, component of TEG (R - reaction time, K - coagulation time, MA - maximum amplitude and α - angle) and laboratory parameters of both the groups were compared.
Bleeding was seen more when CTP scores were ≥10 (P=0.05). The K time of 3.05 min or more on thromboelastograph was a significant predictor of bleeding [area under the curve (AUC) 0.694, P=0.047]. MA of 48.8 mm or more was a significant predictor of non-bleeding. INR ≥2.6 was a significant predictor of bleeding (AUC 0.765, P=0.005). K time had a low-positive predictive value of 20 per cent and the positive and negative likelihood ratios of 1.87 and 0.48, respectively.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the cut-off value for INR ≥2.6 and K time ≥3.05 min predict bleeding and MA ≥48.8 mm predicts non-bleeding in patients with cirrhosis undergoing central venous pressure catheter cannulation.
凝血和止血是动态过程。肝脏疾病中的止血变化会影响凝血的各个方面。凝血酶原时间(PT)/国际标准化比值(INR)用于监测口服抗凝治疗,活化部分凝血活酶时间用于调查遗传性单因子缺乏症。诸如血栓弹力图(TEG)等黏弹性检测可提供有关血凝块形成动态(凝血因子和抗凝活性)、血凝块强度(血小板和纤维蛋白原)以及血凝块稳定性(纤维蛋白溶解和因子 XIII)的信息。在侵入性操作前给予血制品仍以肝病患者的 INR 和血小板计数为指导。本研究旨在评估 TEG 在预测肝硬化患者中心静脉置管术后出血方面的有效性。
研究了 90 例年龄在 20 - 70 岁、诊断为肝硬化且需要择期插入中心静脉导管(CVC)的患者。在操作前记录血小板计数、INR、血清肌酐、TEG 和Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分。经右侧颈内静脉进行置管。根据术后是否出血,将患者分为出血组和非出血组。比较两组的 CTP 评分、TEG 各参数(R - 反应时间、K - 凝血时间、MA - 最大振幅和α - 角)以及实验室参数。
CTP 评分≥10 分时出血更为常见(P = 0.05)。血栓弹力图上 K 时间≥3.05 分钟是出血的显著预测指标[曲线下面积(AUC)0.694,P = 0.047]。MA≥48.8 毫米是无出血的显著预测指标。INR≥2.6 是出血的显著预测指标(AUC 0.765,P = 0.005)。K 时间的阳性预测值较低,为 20%,阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为 1.87 和 0.48。
我们的结果表明,INR≥2.6 和 K 时间≥3.05 分钟的临界值可预测肝硬化患者在进行中心静脉压导管置管时的出血情况,而 MA≥48.8 毫米可预测无出血。