• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病足溃疡的细菌学特征,特别提及生物膜形成

Bacteriological Profile of Diabetic Foot Ulcer With Special Reference to Biofilm Formation.

作者信息

Tirumala Nitya, K Leela Rani

机构信息

Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, IND.

Microbiology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Mar 21;17(3):e80974. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80974. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.80974
PMID:40260359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12010084/
Abstract

Introduction Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder characterized by abnormally high sugar levels in the blood for prolonged periods of time. The world's largest number of diabetics resides in India, making it the world's diabetic capital, with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) incidence of around 8-17%. Due to the polymicrobial and multidrug resistant (MDR) nature of DFUs, antimicrobial susceptibility testing is of high importance to help treat patients effectively and prevent the development of MDR bacteria. The ability to form biofilms is a significant additive to virulence of an organism that causes an able strain to be resistant to more antibiotics as compared to a free-living strain, thereby further delaying the healing of DFUs. Materials and methods This study included 74 samples collected from patients with DFUs, out of which 69 (93.24%) yielded growth on culture. Gram staining was done for the direct microscopy, isolation, and determination of organism, and the detection of biofilm formers using Congo Red Agar plates. Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed. Results Out of 74 samples collected, 69 (93.24%) yielded growth on culturing, with 5 (6.76%) cultures coming back negative. On Gram staining, 42 (56.8%) samples showed Gram-positive cocci and 53 (71.6%) showed Gram-negative bacilli. On isolating organisms from the samples, 16 (21.7%) samples had , followed by at 13 (17.6%) and and at 11 each (14.9%), indicating a Gram-negative bacteria predominance. Of the Gram-positive bacteria isolated, stands at two (2.7%) and at one (1.4%). The prevailing monomicrobiality could be attributed to antibiotic administration prior to sample collection. On antibiotic sensitivity of organisms tested against each antibiotic, more than 75% of tested samples were resistant to ampicillin, cefuroxime, and erythromycin, and around 70% and more of tested samples were sensitive to ertapenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, benzylpenicillin, vancomycin, and clindamycin. Out of the 69 positive cultures, 29 (42.03%) yielded biofilm formers. was the predominant biofilm former with 10 (34.48%) of 29 of total biofilm-forming isolates, followed by and with five each (17.24%) and with three samples (10.34%). Regarding strains forming biofilms according to bacterium species, was predominant, with 100% (two out of two samples) of isolates forming biofilms. was followed by with 62.5% (10 out of 16 samples), (two out of four samples) and (one out of two samples) with 50% each, with 45.45% (5 out of 11 samples), and with 38.46% (5 out of 13 samples) of isolates forming biofilms. It should be noted that only two , four and two samples were isolated in comparison to a larger number of Gram-negative bacteria. This study has found that 100% of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are biofilm formers. Conclusion The ability to form biofilms adds immensely to the virulence and antibiotic resistance. Detection of biofilm formers is non-invasive and convenient to measure and would help provide insight into antibiotics to be administered to the patient, thereby reducing development of MDROs and reducing healing time.

摘要

引言

糖尿病是一种代谢紊乱疾病,其特征是血液中的糖分水平长时间异常升高。世界上糖尿病患者人数最多的国家是印度,使其成为世界糖尿病之都,糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的发病率约为8%-17%。由于DFU具有多种微生物和多重耐药(MDR)的特性,抗菌药物敏感性测试对于有效治疗患者和预防MDR细菌的产生至关重要。形成生物膜的能力是一种生物毒力的重要增强因素,与游离生存菌株相比,能使致病菌株对更多抗生素产生耐药性,从而进一步延迟DFU的愈合。

材料与方法

本研究收集了74份来自DFU患者的样本,其中69份(93.24%)在培养中生长。进行革兰氏染色以用于直接显微镜检查、微生物分离和鉴定,以及使用刚果红琼脂平板检测生物膜形成菌。数据制成表格并进行统计分析。

结果

在收集的74份样本中,69份(93.24%)在培养中生长,5份(6.76%)培养结果为阴性。革兰氏染色显示,42份(56.8%)样本为革兰氏阳性球菌,53份(71.6%)为革兰氏阴性杆菌。从样本中分离微生物时,16份(21.7%)样本含有[具体细菌名称1],其次是13份(17.6%)含有[具体细菌名称2],11份(14.9%)样本分别含有[具体细菌名称3]和[具体细菌名称4],表明革兰氏阴性菌占优势。在分离出的革兰氏阳性菌中,[具体细菌名称5]有2份(2.7%),[具体细菌名称6]有1份(1.4%)。普遍存在的单一微生物感染可能归因于样本采集前使用了抗生素。在针对每种抗生素测试的微生物的药敏试验中,超过75%的测试样本对氨苄西林、头孢呋辛和红霉素耐药,约70%及以上的测试样本对厄他培南、美罗培南、阿米卡星、庆大霉素、苄星青霉素、万古霉素和克林霉素敏感。在69份阳性培养物中,29份(42.03%)产生了生物膜形成菌。[具体细菌名称A]是主要的生物膜形成菌,占29份生物膜形成菌分离株总数的10份(34.48%),其次是[具体细菌名称B]和[具体细菌名称C]各有5份(17.24%),[具体细菌名称D]有3份(10.34%)。关于按细菌种类形成生物膜的菌株,[具体细菌名称E]占主导,其分离株中有100%(两份样本中的两份)形成生物膜。其次是[具体细菌名称F],有62.5%(16份样本中的10份),[具体细菌名称G](四份样本中的两份)和[具体细菌名称H](两份样本中的一份)各有50%,[具体细菌名称I]有45.45%(11份样本中的5份),[具体细菌名称J]有38.46%(13份样本中的5份)的分离株形成生物膜。需要注意的是,与大量革兰氏阴性菌相比,仅分离出两份[具体细菌名称K]、四份[具体细菌名称L]和两份[具体细菌名称M]样本。本研究发现100%的多重耐药菌(MDROs)是生物膜形成菌。

结论

形成生物膜的能力极大地增加了毒力和抗生素耐药性。检测生物膜形成菌是非侵入性的,测量方便,有助于深入了解应给予患者的抗生素,从而减少MDROs的产生并缩短愈合时间。

相似文献

1
Bacteriological Profile of Diabetic Foot Ulcer With Special Reference to Biofilm Formation.糖尿病足溃疡的细菌学特征,特别提及生物膜形成
Cureus. 2025 Mar 21;17(3):e80974. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80974. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Infection Characteristics and Drug Susceptibility of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡患者的多重耐药菌感染特征及药敏分析。
Clin Lab. 2023 Sep 1;69(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230309.
3
Spectrum of bacteria associated with diabetic foot ulcer and biofilm formation: A prospective study.与糖尿病足溃疡相关的细菌谱及生物膜形成:一项前瞻性研究。
Australas Med J. 2015 Sep 30;8(9):280-5. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2015.2422. eCollection 2015.
4
The antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of gentamicin, imipenem, and fucoidan combinations against dual-species biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from diabetic foot ulcers.庆大霉素、亚胺培南和褐藻糖胶组合对糖尿病足溃疡分离的金黄色葡萄球菌和鲍曼不动杆菌双物种生物膜的抗菌和抗生物膜作用。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Nov 15;23(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00760-w.
5
In vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftazidime-avibactam, and comparators against Gram-positive and -negative organisms in China: the 2018 results from the ATLAS program.中国革兰阳性和革兰阴性菌中头孢洛林、头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和对照药物的体外活性:2018 年 ATLAS 项目的结果。
BMC Microbiol. 2022 Oct 1;22(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02644-5.
6
[Microbiological profiles of pathogens causing nosocomial bacteremia in 2011, 2013 and 2016].[2011年、2013年和2016年医院获得性菌血症病原菌的微生物学特征]
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2018 Aug 25;34(8):1205-1217. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.180192.
7
A Study on Isolation, Characterization, and Exploration of Multiantibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in the Wound Site of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients.糖尿病足溃疡患者伤口部位多重耐药菌的分离、鉴定及探索研究
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2021 Mar;20(1):6-14. doi: 10.1177/1534734619884430. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
8
Bacteriological Profile of Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Producers in a Tertiary Care Hospital.三级护理医院中糖尿病足溃疡的细菌学特征以及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和产超广谱β-内酰胺酶菌株的检测
Cureus. 2021 Dec 22;13(12):e20596. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20596. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
[Analysis of the pathogenic characteristics of 162 severely burned patients with bloodstream infection].162例严重烧伤合并血流感染患者的致病特征分析
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 20;32(9):529-35. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.09.004.
10
Multidrug-Resistant and Virulent Organisms Trauma Infections: Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study Initiative.多药耐药和毒力生物体创伤感染:创伤感染性疾病结局研究倡议。
Mil Med. 2022 May 4;187(Suppl 2):42-51. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab131.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidrug resistance, biofilm formation, and genetic determinants in diabetic foot infections from Uttar Pradesh, India: a clinical-microbiological insight from a prospective study.印度北方邦糖尿病足感染中的多重耐药性、生物膜形成及遗传决定因素:一项前瞻性研究的临床微生物学见解
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04284-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review.糖尿病足溃疡:综述。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 3;330(1):62-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10578.
2
Bacteriological Profile of Diabetic Foot Ulcer with Special Reference to Drug-resistant Strains in a Tertiary Care Center in North-East India.印度东北部一家三级护理中心糖尿病足溃疡的细菌学特征,特别提及耐药菌株
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):688-694. doi: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_546_16.
3
Isolation of bacteria from diabetic foot ulcers with special reference to anaerobe isolation by simple two-step combustion technique in candle jar.从糖尿病足溃疡中分离细菌,特别提及通过烛缸中简单的两步燃烧技术分离厌氧菌。
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Jan;145(1):97-101. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1436_14.
4
Prevention and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡的预防与治疗。
J R Soc Med. 2017 Mar;110(3):104-109. doi: 10.1177/0141076816688346. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
5
Neuropathy and Diabetic Foot Syndrome.神经病变与糖尿病足综合征
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jun 10;17(6):917. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060917.
6
Spectrum of bacteria associated with diabetic foot ulcer and biofilm formation: A prospective study.与糖尿病足溃疡相关的细菌谱及生物膜形成:一项前瞻性研究。
Australas Med J. 2015 Sep 30;8(9):280-5. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2015.2422. eCollection 2015.
7
Risk factors for foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus - a short report from vellore, South India.糖尿病患者足部溃疡的危险因素——来自印度南部韦洛尔的一份简短报告。
Indian J Community Med. 2010 Jan;35(1):183-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.62582.
8
Spectrum of microbial flora in diabetic foot ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡中的微生物菌群谱
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008 Apr-Jun;51(2):204-8. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.41685.
9
Biofilms--a microbial life perspective: a critical review.生物膜——微生物生命视角:批判性综述
Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2007;24(5):393-443. doi: 10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v24.i5.10.
10
Foot ulcers in the diabetic patient, prevention and treatment.糖尿病患者足部溃疡的预防与治疗
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(1):65-76.