Suppr超能文献

一项比较亚胺培南/西司他丁加雷巴他韦与亚胺培南/西司他丁单药治疗复杂性尿路感染患者的疗效和安全性的前瞻性、随机、双盲、2 期剂量范围研究。

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 dose-ranging study comparing efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin plus relebactam with imipenem/cilastatin alone in patients with complicated urinary tract infections.

机构信息

William Beaumont Hospital, 3555 W. Thirteen Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.

University Hospital N. I. Pirogov, Boulevard Totleben 21, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Sep 1;72(9):2616-2626. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx139.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam can restore imipenem activity against imipenem non-susceptible pathogens.

METHODS

To explore relebactam's safety, tolerability and efficacy, we conducted a randomized (1:1:1), controlled, Phase 2 trial comparing imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam 250 mg, imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam 125 mg and imipenem/cilastatin alone in adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) or acute pyelonephritis, regardless of baseline pathogen susceptibility. Treatment was administered intravenously every 6 h for 4-14 days, with optional step-down to oral ciprofloxacin. The primary endpoint was favourable microbiological response rate (pathogen eradication) at discontinuation of intravenous therapy (DCIV) in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population. Non-inferiority of imipenem/cilastatin+relebactam over imipenem/cilastatin alone was defined as lower bounds of the 95% CI for treatment differences being above -15%.

RESULTS

At DCIV, 71 patients in the imipenem/cilastatin + 250 mg relebactam, 79 in the imipenem/cilastatin + 125 mg relebactam and 80 in the imipenem/cilastatin-only group were ME; 51.7% had cUTI and 48.3% acute pyelonephritis. Microbiological response rates were 95.5%, 98.6% and 98.7%, respectively, confirming non-inferiority of both imipenem/cilastatin + relebactam doses to imipenem/cilastatin alone. Clinical response rates were 97.1%, 98.7% and 98.8%, respectively. All 23 ME patients with imipenem non-susceptible pathogens had favourable DCIV microbiological responses (100% in each group). Among all 298 patients treated, 28.3%, 29.3% and 30.0% of patients, respectively, had treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common treatment-related adverse events across groups (1.0%-4.0%) were diarrhoea, nausea and headache.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem/cilastatin + relebactam (250 or 125 mg) was as effective as imipenem/cilastatin alone for treatment of cUTI. Both relebactam-containing regimens were well tolerated. (NCT01505634).

摘要

目的

β-内酰胺酶抑制剂雷利巴坦可恢复亚胺培南对亚胺培南不敏感病原体的活性。

方法

为了探索雷利巴坦的安全性、耐受性和疗效,我们进行了一项随机(1:1:1)、对照、2 期试验,比较了亚胺培南/西司他丁+雷利巴坦 250mg、亚胺培南/西司他丁+雷利巴坦 125mg 和亚胺培南/西司他丁单独用于治疗复杂性尿路感染(cUTI)或急性肾盂肾炎的成人患者,无论基线病原体敏感性如何。治疗方案为每 6 小时静脉输注一次,持续 4-14 天,可选择转为口服环丙沙星。主要终点为微生物学可评估(ME)人群中静脉治疗停药(DCIV)时的有利微生物学反应率(病原体清除率)。亚胺培南/西司他丁+雷利巴坦优于亚胺培南/西司他丁的非劣效性定义为治疗差异的 95%CI 下限高于-15%。

结果

在 DCIV 时,亚胺培南/西司他丁+250mg 雷利巴坦组 71 例、亚胺培南/西司他丁+125mg 雷利巴坦组 79 例和亚胺培南/西司他丁组 80 例为 ME;51.7%患有 cUTI,48.3%患有急性肾盂肾炎。微生物学反应率分别为 95.5%、98.6%和 98.7%,证实了亚胺培南/西司他丁+雷利巴坦的两种剂量均不劣于亚胺培南/西司他丁。临床反应率分别为 97.1%、98.7%和 98.8%。所有 23 例 ME 对亚胺培南不敏感的病原体患者均有良好的 DCIV 微生物学反应(每组 100%)。在所有 298 例接受治疗的患者中,分别有 28.3%、29.3%和 30.0%的患者发生治疗后不良事件。最常见的与治疗相关的不良事件(1.0%-4.0%)是腹泻、恶心和头痛。

结论

亚胺培南/西司他丁+雷利巴坦(250 或 125mg)与亚胺培南/西司他丁单独治疗 cUTI 的疗效相当。两种含有雷利巴坦的方案均具有良好的耐受性。(NCT01505634)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验