Suppr超能文献

电子健康记录停机的影响:对患者安全事件报告的分析。

Implications of electronic health record downtime: an analysis of patient safety event reports.

机构信息

Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):187-191. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx057.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to understand the types of clinical processes, such as image and medication ordering, that are disrupted during electronic health record (EHR) downtime periods by analyzing the narratives of patient safety event report data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a database of 80 381 event reports, 76 reports were identified as explicitly describing a safety event associated with an EHR downtime period. These reports were analyzed and categorized based on a developed code book to identify the clinical processes that were impacted by downtime. We also examined whether downtime procedures were in place and followed.

RESULTS

The reports were coded into categories related to their reported clinical process: Laboratory, Medication, Imaging, Registration, Patient Handoff, Documentation, History Viewing, Delay of Procedure, and General. A majority of reports (48.7%, n = 37) were associated with lab orders and results, followed by medication ordering and administration (14.5%, n = 11). Incidents commonly involved patient identification and communication of clinical information. A majority of reports (46%, n = 35) indicated that downtime procedures either were not followed or were not in place. Only 27.6% of incidents (n = 21) indicated that downtime procedures were successfully executed.

DISCUSSION

Patient safety report data offer a lens into EHR downtime-related safety hazards. Important areas of risk during EHR downtime periods were patient identification and communication of clinical information; these should be a focus of downtime procedure planning to reduce safety hazards.

CONCLUSION

EHR downtime events pose patient safety hazards, and we highlight critical areas for downtime procedure improvement.

摘要

目的

通过分析患者安全事件报告数据的叙述,了解电子病历 (EHR) 停机期间中断的临床流程类型,如影像和医嘱下达。

材料和方法

从一个包含 80381 份事件报告的数据库中,确定了 76 份明确描述与 EHR 停机期间相关的安全事件的报告。这些报告根据开发的代码手册进行了分析和分类,以确定受停机影响的临床流程。我们还检查了停机程序是否已到位并得到遵循。

结果

报告被编码为与其报告的临床流程相关的类别:实验室、医嘱、影像、登记、患者交接、文档、病史查看、手术延迟和一般。大多数报告(48.7%,n=37)与实验室医嘱和结果有关,其次是医嘱下达和管理(14.5%,n=11)。事件通常涉及患者身份识别和临床信息的沟通。大多数报告(46%,n=35)表明停机程序未得到遵循或未设置。只有 27.6%的事件(n=21)表明停机程序已成功执行。

讨论

患者安全报告数据提供了一个了解 EHR 停机相关安全风险的视角。EHR 停机期间的重要风险领域是患者身份识别和临床信息的沟通;这些应该是停机程序规划的重点,以减少安全风险。

结论

EHR 停机事件会带来患者安全风险,我们强调停机程序改进的关键领域。

相似文献

1
Implications of electronic health record downtime: an analysis of patient safety event reports.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):187-191. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx057.
2
Continuing Patient Care during Electronic Health Record Downtime.
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):495-504. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692678. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
An Analysis of Patient Safety Incident Reports Associated with Electronic Health Record Interoperability.
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Feb 1;8(2):593-602. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-01-RA-0014.
6
A Resilience Model for Moderating Outcomes Related to Electronic Medical Record Downtime.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jan 14;289:434-438. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210951.
8
An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1053-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002578. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
9
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.
J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec;9(4):177-89. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a8c2b2.
10
Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey.
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014;34(1):14-26. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21146.

引用本文的文献

2
Patient Care Technology Disruptions Associated With the CrowdStrike Outage.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2530226. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30226.
3
Strategy for scheduled downtime of hospital information system utilizing third-party applications.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02710-0.
5
IT risk management for medical devices in hospital IT networks: a catalogue of measures and indicators.
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Jan;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100639.
6
Evaluation of Electronic Medical Record Downtime in a Busy Emergency Department.
Qatar Med J. 2020 Jul 29;2020(1):20. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2020.20. eCollection 2020.
7
Data breach remediation efforts and their implications for hospital quality.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):971-980. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13203.
8
Continuing Patient Care during Electronic Health Record Downtime.
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):495-504. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692678. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
9
Clinical impact of intraoperative electronic health record downtime on surgical patients.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):928-933. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz029.
10
Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety.
Health Informatics J. 2020 Mar;26(1):181-189. doi: 10.1177/1460458218814893. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

2
Measuring the effects of computer downtime on hospital pathology processes.
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Feb;59:308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.016. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
3
Contingency planning for electronic health record-based care continuity: a survey of recommended practices.
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov;83(11):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
5
Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey.
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014;34(1):14-26. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21146.
6
A red-flag-based approach to risk management of EHR-related safety concerns.
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;33(2):21-6. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21123.
7
Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER): study protocol.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 12;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-46.
8
Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1854-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1205420.
9
'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验